In the cloudstack UI we do have certain parameters defined at Zone and Cluster
level which can be used to override the global values. Say for zone level
parameters browse to Infrastructure > Zones > Settings tab. You
will see bunch of settings defined. Similarly the case with cluster. I am su
Congrats Saksham.
Thanks,
RamG
> -Original Message-
> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 03 June 2014 11:06
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
>
> Great work Saksham! Congratulations.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014
Same here. I had permissions to assign tickets earlier. I no longer can. Not
sure if it is intended.
Thanks,
RamG
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Hitchins [mailto:a...@alexhitchins.com]
> Sent: 14 May 2014 17:21
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Jira Permissions
>
> Hi all,
>
Changing the subject line to reflect what's broken. Not sure who owns the
Jenkins infra. Can someone help here? HyperV agent build is broken since April
5th.
Thanks,
RamG
> -Original Message-
> From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 24 April 2014 11:4
> > Thanks for your reply, Sanjay. I understand that it's only K1 and K2 cards
> > at the moment, but when they add more, do we really want to have
> > to edit the code to match? What is the notification process by which we
> > know there are new types? Does the user have to upgrade CloudStack
>
elease, which
> > is still a few months away. For significant issues, it's not uncommon
> > for us to allow them in late.
> >
> > What we have a stronger need for than shifting a date, by several
> > orders of magnitude, is understanding why the RC process took so
the record I'm +0 on moving the feature freeze date.
>
> John
>
> On Feb 26, 2014, at 7:10 PM, Ram Ganesh wrote:
>
> > I share it too. Many developers in the community went out of their way
> > to get a cleaner RC and thereby impacting their feature dev
I share it too. Many developers in the community went out of their way to get a
cleaner RC and thereby impacting their feature development efforts. We
shouldn't be penalizing them with this 2 week's feature freeze schedule
Thanks,
RamG
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [ma
Gaurav,
I have updated the ticket with my comments. Essentially it is a network
property , persistent vs non-persistent and VM should not dictate it. Let me
know
Thanks,
RamG
> -Original Message-
> From: Gaurav Aradhye [mailto:gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com]
> Sent: 28 January 2014 16:25
Are we looking good with the donation code and can we make progress to get this
code into a private branch?
Thanks,
RamG
> -Original Message-
> From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 21 October 2013 18:37
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Discuss]
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 26 September 2013 22:52
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Managers for future ACS releases -
> enhacement
>
> Agreed. If you look at what a release manager has to do today
>
> -
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13641/#review25291
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Ram Ganesh
On Aug. 19, 2013, 6:26 a.m
f my bugs missed this information and the UI team
> didn't notice it.
>
> On 05/08/13 12:57 PM, "Ram Ganesh" wrote:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> >> Sent: 02 August 2013 23:36
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: 02 August 2013 23:36
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.
>
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 11:06:53AM +, Ram
Hi,
While triaging bugs I noticed that many bugs had affectedVersion field as
empty. This makes it difficult to guess the version/release the reporter was
on while filing the bug. Can we make the affectedVersion field a mandatory
field instead?
Thanks,
RamG
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: 24 July 2013 10:02
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Components on JIRA
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 05:23:03PM +, Ram Ganesh wrote:
> > > -Original Mes
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: 23 July 2013 22:36
> To: CloudStack Dev
> Subject: New Components on JIRA
>
> The following new components have been added to JIRA to narrow down
> issues into the right buckets.
>
> (name, description)
> ---
Association of DC to a Zone was introduced as part of [1]. With this change
VCenter details at the "Add Cluster" page should be optional to take care of
legacy zones(zones created prior to [1] support). This could be a bug in UI
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Mapping
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11858/#review22950
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Ram Ganesh
On June 30, 2013, 6:08 a.m
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 04 July 2013 17:10
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: aemne...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic
>
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:21:55AM +, Ra
This could happen if there is a stickiness policy configured on the LB rule.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 04 July 2013 15:39
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Verifying Load Balancer logic
>
> why would we remove these cases a
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: 03 July 2013 20:13
> To:
> Cc: fgaudrea...@cloudops.com
> Subject: Re: Auto-scaling won't scale down
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Ram Ganesh
> wrote:
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: 03 July 2013 19:58
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com
> Subject: Re: Auto-scaling won't scale down
>
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:14:38AM -0400, Francois Gaudreault wrote:
> > I am
> -Original Message-
> From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com]
> Sent: 03 July 2013 19:46
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Auto-scaling won't scale down
>
> I did some more tests around this, and the NetScaler does trigger the scale
> down, but it looks li
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: 04 June 2013 10:44
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: netscaler jars hosted in maven central
>
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 02:13:19PM +, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Apache lice
Congrats Devdeep.
- Reply message -
From: "Chip Childers"
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
Date: Tue, May 14, 2013 8:47 pm
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Devdeep Singh to become a committer and we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10570/#review19619
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Ram Ganesh
On April 17, 2013, 11:59 a.m
Congrats Prasanna.
Regards,
RamG
> -Original Message-
> From: L Radhakrishna Rao [mailto:satishsaga...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 23 April 2013 12:42
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam
>
> Congratulations!!!
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:17 AM,
> -Original Message-
> From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Rohit Yadav
> Sent: 01 April 2013 13:31
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Unassigned Critical Upgrade defects
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti <
Nitin,
Can you please review the patch and apply it if the changes are ok?
Thanks,
RamG
-Original Message-
From: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Sanjay
Tripathi
Sent: 21 March 2013 12:47
To: Sateesh Chodapuneedi; mice xia; Min Chen; Nitin Mehta; Devdeep
Great news!
Thanks,
RamG
-Original Message-
From: Gavin Lee [mailto:gavin@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 March 2013 12:23
To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Graduation
Very pleased to hear this!
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Rajesh Battala
wrote:
> Great News... :)
>
>>
31 matches
Mail list logo
