Isaac, I tried some of your changes. Looks good.
Regards,
Saksham
-Original Message-
From: Isaac Chiang [mailto:isaacchi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 3:12 PM
To: Pranav Saxena
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Git Push Summary
Hi all,
I've been working
---
On July 27, 2013, 6:58 p.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12968/
---
(Updated July 27, 2013, 6
(TemplateProfile) method, you will see that
there is a for-loop to download the template to each image store for each
zone. For each image store, this createTemplateAsyncCallback will be
invoked. So in this callback, you should just generate usage event for this
zone.
Saksham Srivastava wrote
processed: 0
virtual_size: NULL
Build passed.
Patch applies cleanly.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
://reviews.apache.org/r/12993/diff/
Testing
---
Build is successful.
Patch applies cleanly.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12968/
---
(Updated July 26, 2013, 12:42 p.m
://reviews.apache.org/r/12968/#comment47832
Min, I have created a new patch addressing all the concerns, also removed
extra checks.
- Saksham Srivastava
On July 27, 2013, 6:58 p.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote
|
++-++-+-+-+---+-+-+--+---+---+--+
Build passed.
Patch applies cleanly.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
|
++-++-+-+-+---+-+-+--+---+---+--+
Build passed.
Patch applies cleanly.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
/StorageUsageParser.java 337e8e2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12852/diff/
Testing
---
Usage event generated for creating template with virtual size.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
Not there in 4.2?
-Original Message-
From: Isaac Chiang [mailto:isaacchi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 3:12 PM
To: Pranav Saxena
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Git Push Summary
Hi all,
I've been working on re-factoring the dedication UI code in these
/schema-410to420.sql f9417a0
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12811/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
for creating template with virtual size.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
are generated.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
implicitly dedicated hosts and alerts are generated.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
---
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
implicitly dedicated hosts and alerts are generated.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
/#review23372
---
On July 19, 2013, 11:52 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12720
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java 9968690
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12720/diff/
Testing
---
Migrated VMs across explicitly dedicated hosts and alerts are generated.
Migrated VMs across implicitly dedicated hosts and alerts are generated.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
The fix should qualify for 4.1.1
Thanks,
Saksham
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 6:41 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena Prokharchyk; Devdeep Singh
Cc: Saksham Srivastava; cloudstack
Subject: RE: Review Request 12510
://reviews.apache.org/r/12510/diff/
Testing
---
If domain has dedicated resources, cleanup=true will release dedication and
delete the domain.
cleanup=false will not release dedication and will not delete the domain.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
---
On July 12, 2013, 2:01 p.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12510/
---
(Updated July 12
://reviews.apache.org/r/12326/diff/
Testing
---
Created a shared network.
Added the NIC to a vm with error state, causing a NIC entry in db but removed
as not null.
Added the same network again without error state, the network gets added.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
---
Tested on local setup.
Build successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
://reviews.apache.org/r/11627/diff/
Testing
---
Tested on local setup.
Build successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
/DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java 4ef2152
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12028/diff/
Testing
---
Tested dedicating zone, then deploying vms from other accounts, it fails now.
Also if no affinity group is chosen for the same account, vm deployment fails.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
vlan480-504;910-914;916-918;920-923;925-934;936-940/vlan
isolationmethodsVLAN/isolationmethods
/physicalnetwork
/listphysicalnetworksresponse
Build passes successfully.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
/listphysicalnetworksresponse
Build passes successfully.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 12:40 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chiradeep Vittal
Cc: Kishan Kavala; Saksham Srivastava; cloudstack
Subject: Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1012:Encrypt system.vm.password for 4.0
to 4.1 upgrades
Also
= Existing Reservation is not affected.
Added UnitTest testIsSameIpRange()
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
|
| 28 | NETWORK.OFFERING.ASSIGN | 2 | 2013-05-29 12:31:58 | 1 |
3 | 8 | 8 |NULL | 0 | NULL
| 0 |
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
unit tests under :
plugins/dedicated-resources/test/org/apache/cloudstack/dedicated/DedicatedApiUnitTest.java
Marvin Test: To dedicate host, create affinity group, deploy-vm, check if vm is
deployed on the dedicated host.
Rat Build Successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
is
deployed on the dedicated host.
Rat Build Successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
/cloudstack/dedicated/DedicatedApiUnitTest.java
Marvin Test: To dedicate host, create affinity group, deploy-vm, check if vm is
deployed on the dedicated host.
Rat Build Successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
Successful.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
: For the new APIs and Service, added unit tests under :
plugins/dedicated-resources/test/org/apache/cloudstack/dedicated/DedicatedApiUnitTest.java
Marvin Test: To dedicate host, create affinity group, deploy-vm, check if vm is
deployed on the dedicated host.
Rat Build Successful.
Thanks,
Saksham
generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11379/#review21000
---
On May 24, 2013, 7:30 p.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e
Congrats Swamy.
On Friday 24 May 2013 02:51 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Venkata Swamy to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that they have accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11156/diff/
Testing
---
Tested manually.
Rat build passed.
Rebased to latest master.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
Hi,
I did a fresh setup of CloudStack master,
Both the system vms are running fine and the secondary storage is also
shown enabled.
But the built-in template is not getting downloaded.
ISO Registration happens but the ISO download is not initiated.
I keep on getting this message in the logs:
? It could be related
to CLOUDSTACK-2064
On 10-May-2013, at 7:20 PM, Saksham Srivastava
saksham.srivast...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I did a fresh setup of CloudStack master,
Both the system vms are running fine and the secondary storage is also
shown enabled.
But the built-in template is not getting
Hi Mice ,
I just saw your commit for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2277
So I recently picked this bug, marked it as in progress as I was
working on it and was about to submit the patch for the same, but then I
saw that you already fixed it :)
A quick comment :
The fix
(10.1.1.255) for the entire network.
Am I missing something?
Regards,
Saksham
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 3:55 PM
To: Saksham Srivastava; Murali Reddy
Cc: cloudstack
Subject: RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1748: IP Reservation results
., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10078/
---
(Updated March 22, 2013, 10:04 a.m.)
Review
://reviews.apache.org/r/10005/diff/
Testing
---
CIDR : 10.0.144.0/20, Network CIDR : null, guestVmCidr : 10.0.151.0/20 =
Reservation is not applied.
CIDR : 10.0.144.0/21, Network CIDR : 10.0.144.0/20, guestVmCidr : 10.0.151.0/20
= Existing Reservation is not affected.
Thanks,
Saksham Srivastava
. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10005/#review19396
---
On April 19, 2013, 9:45 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply
FS is available at :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Add+Remove+Networks+to+VMs+%28Enhanced%29
Thanks,
Saksham
On Monday 15 April 2013 11:11 PM, Saksham Srivastava wrote:
Following the discussion on bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-645 , there needs
).
Should we allow only one of them, as they both tend to serve the same purpose,
or am I missing something?
Thanks,
Saksham
From: Marcus Sorensen [shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 9:03 PM
To: Saksham Srivastava
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re
Following the discussion on bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-645 , there needs to be some
work done for enhancing VMware support for the feature Add/Remove Network on
VM.
I will be updating the FS soon and will send out for review.
Thanks,
Saksham
Changing the subject and reposting.
-Original Message-
From: Abhinav Roy [mailto:abhinav@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 10:36 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [IP Reservation] Is VM creation using the reserved IPs on
cloudstack managed hosts supported?
Hi,
101 - 151 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
