What is the hypervisor you are using?
On 03/10/13 6:14 PM, David Ortiz dpor...@outlook.com wrote:
If you manually change the vm status in the database would it let you
destroy it then?
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 20:22:33 +0800
Subject: Re: [URGENT] Unable to stop/start system VMs after upgrade to
Congrats Rajesh!
On 25/09/13 10:00 AM, Abhinav Roy abhinav@citrix.com wrote:
Congrats Rajesh :)
-Original Message-
From: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:58 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New
Hi Gaurav,
The VLAN parameter is not mandatory. Depending on your environment you can
either pass a VLAN tag / untagged one.
We have updated our documents about the issue with adding same ip range
across portable and public VLANs. This is punted for 4.2.1.
Thanks,
SWAMY
On 04/09/13 8:26 PM,
not work)
Regards,
Girish
On 05-Sep-2013, at 9:41 AM, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru
venkataswamybabu.budum...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Gaurav,
The VLAN parameter is not mandatory. Depending on your environment you
can
either pass a VLAN tag / untagged one.
We have updated our documents about
4.2 RC1 is planned for today. Please see the link
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-42-release.html
On 19/08/13 6:14 AM, Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.com wrote:
Any ETA when this version will be released?
On Aug 17, 2013, at 11:43 PM, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru
Hi Maurice,
This piece is now automatically done by CloudStack 4.2 release. There is a
feature called secondary Ips / multiple Ips per NIC. You can have a look
at the code to see what you need to exactly configure.
On 17/08/13 12:05 AM, Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.com wrote:
Greetings,
It is available for both advanced and basic.
On 18/08/13 12:55 AM, Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.com wrote:
Oh, in 4.2 -- will this only be available in advanced networking? Or both
basic advanced?
- Maurice
On Aug 17, 2013, at 3:56 AM, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru
venkataswamybabu.budum
Gaurav,
Test execution results are updated in a different location for all the
features. The one which you are referring here is TestPlan section. Yes you are
right that I didn't update all tests with steps. I will be adding all the
details soon.
Thanks,
SWAMY
From: Gaurav Aradhye
+1
-SWAMY
On 04/06/13 3:03 PM, Sailaja Mada sailaja.m...@citrix.com wrote:
I would vote +1 only if A) No new features B) Existing features should
continue to work and not cause for regression failures .
Thanks,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers
Congrats all!
On 28/05/13 12:53 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am pleased to report that the following projects have been accepted by
the 2013 Google Summer of Code:
CloudStack: LDAP user provisioning, Ian Duffy
Improving CloudStack support in Apache Whirr and Apache
Hi,
Here is the link to TestPlan :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/TestPlan+for+PortableIP+feature
Please review and let me know your review comments.
FS Link : https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/portable-public-ip.html
Earlier, I used to see a category for each
Congratulations Sangeetha.
On 24/05/13 12:05 PM, Abhinandan Prateek cloudst...@aprateek.com wrote:
Congrats Sangeetha !
On 24/05/13 11:56 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:18:52AM +, Alex Huang wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache
Hi,
Currently XcpServerDiscoverer.java is coded to support each individual version
of XenSever based on XenSever version. In fact, CS is only talking to XAPI
hence, can we just rely on XAPI version rather the XenServer version. This
approach will avoid changing XcpSserverDiscoverer.java for
Hi,
I didn't find the old mail thread about this FS. Hence posting my review
comments in a new thread.
I have few queries/ comments after reviewing the FS [1]
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/eip-enhancements.html
[2] Prior discussion thread : http://sy.pe/6bNG
1. Are we providing
Hi Sanjeev,
I had a quick look at the test plan. here is my little feedback / queries about
the test plan/functionality. please ignore if any of them are already covered.
* Multiple image stores of same provider type :
Can we add some cases specific to this like adding templates, taking
Hi Parth,
It would be good if we cover the following tests.
1. Verify if associate a UCS profile to UCS blade takes more than the default
timeout I.e 10 mins
2. Test if there was already a profile with same name as CS cloned profile.
3. Test to verify UCS profile sync is working (update from
Sure prasanna. Will submit the patch.
Thanks
Sent from Samsung tablet
prasanna t...@apache.org wrote:
On 19 April 2013 16:29, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru
venkataswamybabu.budum...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I am seeing the following issue on the MASTER build. Currently I filled
Currently I see that we allow VM to have multiple nics one in VPC n/w another
in isolate network. Is there any use case for this?
Thanks,
SWAMY
Hi Murali,
Please review the test plan [1] for feature GSLB (Global Server Load
Balancing) and let me know the review comments. The test cases are mentioned
in an excel sheet attached to the page.
[1] Test Plan :
Im also not able to access cwiki. Can someone look into it?
Thanks
Sent from Samsung tablet
Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
It's taking very long time for the https://cwiki.apache.org/ to respond. Saving
wiki pages is taking long time and sometimes showing blank page as
20 matches
Mail list logo
