Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #5015

When I commit a few minutes ago, I received notification e-mail of "cloudstack-rat-master" job. It seems jenkins job or jenkins slave "ubuntu-1" was not configured properly. Could anyone look into the issue? -- Forwarded message -- From: Apache Jenkins Server Date: 2014-07-13 0:42

Re: Live migration failed on 4.4 branch with KVM hypervisor

It seems I faced this issue, which is not related to CloudStack. https://pthree.org/2012/06/15/libvirt-tyan-motherboards-and-uuid/ I will close the ticket. Regards, Noji 2014-07-09 14:12 GMT-06:00 Yoshikazu Nojima : > Hi, > > I made a new blocker ticket for 4.4 branch. > "Live

Live migration failed on 4.4 branch with KVM hypervisor

Hi, I made a new blocker ticket for 4.4 branch. "Live migration failed on 4.4 branch with KVM hypervisor". https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7086 Since this is a regression, I filed as a blocker. Regards, Noji

Re: [ACS4.5] Can't access volumes on storage tab in GUI

Hi all, I pushed a commit to fix this issue. I confirmed listVolumes doesn't throw an error now in my environment. Commit 890e71cb5c2f80b09cd4db7947d94e325d7bd182 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from Yoshikazu Nojima [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git

Re: [ACS4.5] Can't access volumes on storage tab in GUI

Hi Mike, I suppose "iso" is an alias for "vm_template". See the left join syntax you refered. >left join >`cloud`.`vm_template` iso ON iso.id = volumes.iso_id Regards, Noji 2014-07-01 12:19 GMT-06:00 Mike Tutkowski : > This diff shows some of the problem: > > http://i.imgur.

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

cally generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/#review47114 --- On April 9, 2014, 10:58 p.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: > > --- > This is an automa

Re: [ACS4.4, 4.4-forward] Please revert commit

Hi Dann, Thank you for organizing issue. > Is this a blocker? Yes, it is. At least Mike's latest commit in master should be picked into 4.4 to utilize SolidFire's storage. If possible, I would like to make additional change I proposed. I regard this part is better to have, but not a blocker for 4.

Re: Review Request 22717: refactor StoragePoolAllocator#filter logic

o iSCSI storage being filtered out for ROOT volumes, > > which is a legitimate use case in my scenario. > > > > As such, I had to return the filter method to the > > ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator class. > > > > I left in the other modification to the AbstractS

Re: Review Request 22717: refactor StoragePoolAllocator#filter logic

iltering logic not because storage is zone wide, but because storage is SolidFire's. - Yoshikazu --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/#review46838 -----

Re: Is VM snapshot supported in KVM ?

In my understanding, the setting you mentioned is applied for KVM's volume snapshot. Even if it is enabled, VM snapshot is not enabled for KVM deployment. Regards, Noji 2014-06-20 15:14 GMT-06:00 Angeline Shen : > Rayees: > > Please ensure in MS Global setting kvm.snapshot.enabled

Re: IOPS throttling setting isn't applied to a dinamically attached volume

ore we > mark it as such. This also ensures that enough devs are aware that we > have such an issue. > > hope you understand, > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: >> Daan, >> >> Could you let me know the definitions of each priorities in ACS &g

Re: [ACS 4.4] cherry-pick request for CLOUDSTACK-6935

Daan, Could you cherry-pick 45f0c7367680f4bfbcee470139b708d69322be78 instead of cd414a0f56798ae801fc464be127e37daabef809? Regards, Noji 2014-06-18 11:59 GMT-06:00 Yoshikazu Nojima : > Daan, > > Could you cherry-pick the commit > "cd414a0f56798ae801fc464be127e37daabef809"

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #985

Sorry for this mess. I'll fix. 2014-06-18 12:58 GMT-06:00 : > See > > Changes: > > [brian.federle] List view: Pass ID to action pre-filters > > -- > [...truncated 1540 lines...] > [INFO] --- mave

[ACS 4.4] cherry-pick request for CLOUDSTACK-6935

Daan, Could you cherry-pick the commit "cd414a0f56798ae801fc464be127e37daabef809" into 4.4? This is a fix to the bug CLOUDSTACK-6935. Bug description: Some storage pool filtering logic like hypervisor type check, storage type check for root volume and avoid list check is not enabled in ZoneWideSt

Re: IOPS throttling setting isn't applied to a dinamically attached volume

Daan, Could you let me know the definitions of each priorities in ACS project (or a document that describe the definition)? Sometimes I'm confused which priority to use. Thanks, Noji 2014-06-18 6:09 GMT-06:00 Daan Hoogland : > H, > > Yoshikazu Nojima created an issue as

Re: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me

: > >> Yeah, storagePoolHasEnoughIops returns true in the traditional case (i.e. >> non-managed storage) so we won't skip a storage pool when IOPS are not >> really being taken into consideration. >> >> Feel free to make enhancements and I can review your patch. >

Re: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me

st question seems like a bug to me. >> >> I am not sure about the IOPS >> >> Prachi >> >> -Original Message- >> From: ynoj...@ynojima.net [mailto:ynoj...@ynojima.net] On Behalf Of >> Yoshikazu Nojima >> Sent: Tuesday, June 17,

Review Request 22717: refactor StoragePoolAllocator#filter logic

/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/allocator/AbstractStoragePoolAllocator.java ddbb5a4 engine/storage/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/allocator/ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator.java 8fb9c8d Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me

Hi, ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me. ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator and ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator are allocator classes to select storage pool. They extends AbstractStoragePoolAllocator class, which provides "filter" method to exclude unavailable storage pools. Why Zo

Re: Question about guaranteed IOPS feature

that). This minimum number of IOPS is >> guaranteed even during failure scenarios. >> >> 3) Punith is referring to dynamically changing the number of IOPS available >> of the SAN volume and making those new IOPS available to the CloudStack >> volume or volumes that levera

Re: Why does cloudstack-setup-management make /root writable?

of any reason why /root must be 777. > Big security hole in my opinion. > I'd say to give it a try in your env first, if your tests pass, commit. > On 5/31/14, 12:06 AM, Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: > Hi, > Does anyone know the reason why cloudstack-setup-management make /root > d

Question about guaranteed IOPS feature

Punith, Mike, Allow me to ask questions regarding guaranteed IOPS feature. (Since it may be off-topic to Hieu's original question, I changed the subject.) Q1) Does your plugins(Solidfire, CloudBytes) support KVM? From which version? In my understanding, Current CloudStack's implementation guaran

[ACS4.4] Cherry-pick request for CLOUDSTACK-6816

Daan, Could you cherry-pick the commit 1f7167555d92bc2d5eb964e6de88a052db1388a7 to 4.4 branch? This commit is to fix the bug CLOUDSTACK-6816 . https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6816 http://apache.markmail.org/message/xtk2tcpc4nscukhn Thanks, Noji

Why does cloudstack-setup-management make /root writable?

Hi, Does anyone know the reason why cloudstack-setup-management make /root directory mode 777 in ubuntu? https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/python/lib/cloudutils/serviceConfig.py#L767 If no one have objection, I will remove this code. Regards, Noji

[ACS4.4] Cherry pick request : 12e552b06dfac5f19737f79aa0a8424b01b3197e

Hi Daan, Could you cherry-pick the commit 12e552b06dfac5f19737f79aa0a8424b01b3197e to 4.4? This commit fix the bug that make systemvm build stall. Regards, Noji

Question about Marvin's zone deployment feature

Hi all, Does Marvin support creating storage network IP range while deploying a zone? I couldn't find the place to configure it. Thanks, Noji

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.4-forward to b4457d9

Sateesh, Sorry for skipping ticket creation. Here it is: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6746 Regards, Noji 2014-05-21 22:44 GMT-06:00 Sateesh Chodapuneedi : > Hi Yoshi, > > Can you please let me know the JIRA bug ID addressed by this commit? > > Regards, > Sateesh > >> -Orig

[ACS4.4] Cherry-pick request : b4457d92f4ceec83f09b4514a0164c7ec3775e4d

Daan, Could you cherry-pick the commit b4457d92f4ceec83f09b4514a0164c7ec3775e4d ? It fix the bug that makes systemvm template build failed since newer vboxmanage generates $appliance-$branch-vmware-disk3.vmdk. Regards, Noji

Re: Review Request 21682: Removing tests related to sparse and fat volume provisioning from 4.4-forward. This feature is not part of 4.4 release.

> On May 20, 2014, 4:16 p.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: > > Ship It! Oh, it's already shipped. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=f278c537d527aa0a9cf0e20cf80dd48e1d85ec82 - Yoshikazu

Re: Review Request 21682: Removing tests related to sparse and fat volume provisioning from 4.4-forward. This feature is not part of 4.4 release.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21682/#review43488 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Yoshikazu Nojima On May 20, 2014, 5:15 a.m

Re: [ACS44] critical issue assesment

All, I bring up one more blocker bug. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6616 I tried to resolve it, but I couldn't. Is there anyone good at debian preseeding? 2014-05-19 10:33 GMT-06:00 Animesh Chaturvedi : > I will put a slot in my calendar for triaging bugs daily from now on.

Re: Patch missing in 4.4-forward

Gaurav, This patch is intended to be released in 4.5 release, because when I wrote up it, 4.4 feature freeze date was already passed. I'm not sure which unit test are you talking about? Regards, Noji 2014-05-19 8:20 GMT-06:00 Gaurav Aradhye : > Hi, > > The patch related to feature "Volume Prov

RHEL7(CentOS7?) Support

Hi all, I had a quick look at RHEL7 RC to check KVM improvement introduced in RHEL7. I found some dependency of cloudstack 4.5 snapshot rpm are broken (it is not surprise). I'm not familiar with RHEL, but it seems some of essential packages for CloudStack like tomcat6 are no longer provided in RH

Re: Cannot assign bugs on ASF Cloudstack Jira

Hi I experienced same issue. Does anyone have any idea? Regards, Noji 2014-05-07 0:01 GMT-06:00 Saksham Srivastava : > Hi, > > I tried assigning 4.4 bug to myself on https://issues.apache.org/jira > But the UI option to change the assignee seems disabled. > > Anyone else having the same issue ?

Re: [ACS4.4] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-6614

oji 2014-05-08 17:03 GMT-06:00 Yoshikazu Nojima : > Daan, > > Could you cherry-pick the commit > "3187411f9f6d61d50aa73614f991c4866f5f0375" to 4.4 branch? > It resolve the issue that systemvm template build fails. > > > Thanks, > Noji

Re: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

Ian, I experienced same issue, and I tried your solution, but it doesn't work for me. Any thoughts on this? https://github.com/verio-cloudstack/cloudstack/commit/8961c30e34afb34e4697e3ec3c25928e4d585a86 [cloudstack-pullreq-systemvm64] $ /bin/sh -xe /tmp/hudson9072932445266075170.sh + sudo apt-g

[ACS4.4] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-6614

Daan, Could you cherry-pick the commit "3187411f9f6d61d50aa73614f991c4866f5f0375" to 4.4 branch? It resolve the issue that systemvm template build fails. Thanks, Noji

Re: [PROPOSAL] Using continuous integration to maintain our code quality...

Alex, Thank you for interesting proposal. I suppose pre check-in test is long-awaited for everyone. I'm looking forward to see your Jenkins made public. If possible, can you share jenkins job's settings.xml for future reference when it is ready? Regards, Noji 2014-05-13 2:04 GMT-06:00 Daan Hoog

Re: [API][CLOUDMONKEY] - looking for example on creating entire zone with everything else

This is a CloudMonkey script to deploy a VXLAN enabled zone with KVM hypervisor. https://gist.github.com/c30e1d5d08e500e49e64.git This is a marvin config to deploy a VXLAN enabled zone with KVM hypervisor. https://gist.github.com/ynojima/e104189410649f3a9c91 Since this scripts use VXLAN and KVM,

[ACS4.4] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-6571

Hi Daan or Hugo, Could you cherry pick 03156ecd6f52bfa0c73f1408ac4baca5332d1cad to 4.4? It contains fix for the bug that prevents cloudstack-agent stop. Thanks, Noji

[ACS44] Cherry-pick request for CLOUDSTACK-6351

Hi Daan or Hugo, Could you please cherry-pick fa4e7fc7f75c7cf6065b2e97e1d27c942c9a73af into the 4.4 branch? This patch fixes CLOUDSTACK-6351 java6 is installed instead of java7 when CloudStack rpm is installed. I confirmed it successfully resolves dependency and installs java-1.7.0-openjdk. Th

Re: Review Request 20184: CLOUDSTACK-6369: Qcow2's cluster_size option support

master in a few days. - Yoshikazu Nojima On April 9, 2014, 11:21 p.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache

Re: Review Request 20184: CLOUDSTACK-6369: Qcow2's cluster_size option support

master in a few days. - Yoshikazu Nojima On April 9, 2014, 11:21 p.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache

[ACS44][cherry-pick request]Bugfix: Retired maven repo breaking awsapi build and RPM packaging

Daan or Hugo, Could you cherry-pick following commit to 4.4 branch? 756f48f9105b5b95277268fc3ab554ee182e1f47 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=756f48f9105b5b95277268fc3ab554ee182e1f47 This commit will fix the mvn package resolution trouble. https://issues.apach

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Yoshikazu Nojima as committer

Thank you, Marcus, Daan. Noji 2014-04-18 16:21 GMT-06:00 Daan Hoogland : > go Yoshi go > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Marcus wrote: >> We are pleased to announce that Yoshikazu Nojima has accepted the role >> of committer for the Apache CloudStack project

Re: java6 is installed instead of java7 when CloudStack rpm which build from master branch is installed with yum command.

=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=098ad53c23dae75e11e2877d775ed1b93035a12d 2014-04-18 18:21 GMT-06:00 David Nalley : > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: >> David, >> Thank you for your information. >> >> It works! >> I will send a patch for 4.4 and for master. &g

Review Request 20497: CLOUDSTACK-6457: java6 is installed instead of java7 by yum dependancy resolution

at java-1.7.0-openjdk was installed and cloudstack-agent works. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: java6 is installed instead of java7 when CloudStack rpm which build from master branch is installed with yum command.

centos_updates_6.5_x86_64147 k usbredir x86_64 0.5.1-1.el6 centos_os_6.5_x86_64 40 k vgabios noarch 0.6b-3.7.el6 centos_os_6.5_x86_64

java6 is installed instead of java7 when CloudStack rpm which build from master branch is installed with yum command.

Hi, I found java6 is installed instead of java7 when CloudStack rpm which build from master branch is installed with yum command. Rpm spec file specifies java 1.7.0 or later, but it doesn't work. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/49a29 I confirmed my rpm has a requirement for java 1.7

Re: Review Request 20357: [CS-5907] [CS-6396] Fix for RBD (and potentially CLVM) volumes w/ KVM incorrectly identified as OVM volumes (not able to snapshot)

> On April 16, 2014, 4:02 a.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: > > It seems getHypervisorTypeFromFormat method is only called from > > VolumeJoinDaoImpl#newVolumeResponse. > > It should be fixed, but does it affect snapshot feature? > > Tanner Danzey wrote: > Ye

Re: Review Request 20357: [CS-5907] [CS-6396] Fix for RBD (and potentially CLVM) volumes w/ KVM incorrectly identified as OVM volumes (not able to snapshot)

VolumeJoinDaoImpl#newVolumeResponse. It should be fixed, but does it affect snapshot feature? - Yoshikazu Nojima On April 16, 2014, 3:23 a.m., Tanner Danzey wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit

Review Request 20184: CLOUDSTACK-6369: Qcow2's cluster_size option support

ed volume is provisioned with cluster_size=2097152. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

New data disk creation and attachment - create and attach "thin" type volume to a VM, and check the data volume is provisioned as s thin disk - create and attach "sparse" type volume to a VM, and check the data volume is provisioned as s sparse disk - create and attach "fat" type volume to a VM, and check the data volume is provisioned as s fat disk Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: [Announce] New Committer: Lucian Paul (Nux)

Congratulation Nux! 2014-04-07 13:32 GMT-06:00 Giles Sirett : > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has > asked Lucian Paul (Nux) to become a committer and we are pleased to announce > that he has accepted. > > Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

ed e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/#review38862 ------- On March 26, 2014, 11:24 p.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: > > --- > This is an a

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

he.org/r/19446/#review38855 --- On March 26, 2014, 11:24 p.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

d to be used by hypervisors to decide provisioning type(thin/fat/sparse) of volumes. This paramaeter doesn't relate to the fact that volume creation is delayed to the timing of attach. - Yoshikazu --- This is an automatically generate

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

ocation option is specified to RAW format", which affects Ceph installation. - Yoshikazu ------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/#review38838 ---

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

age is created prior to the cp even without this patch, but without this patch, createPhysicalDisk calls libvirt and it doesn't output output the creation to a log. I'm not sure why current implementation create a volume and override it, but it it is not necessary, I will erase it. - Yoshikazu ---

Review Request 19730: Bugfix: CLOUDSTACK-6292 live migration failed because of VNC server address is not changed

accept domXml. Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java 1d7d1b2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19730/diff/ Testing --- Live migration between two KVM hosts. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

attach "sparse" type volume to a VM, and check the data volume is provisioned as s sparse disk - create and attach "fat" type volume to a VM, and check the data volume is provisioned as s fat disk Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

---- On March 21, 2014, 5:02 p.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/ > -

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

446/#comment70088> Thank you for pointing out. It seems it is by mistake. I made it comment in when I implemented the feature as global setting option. - Yoshikazu Nojima On March 21, 2014, 5:02 p.m., Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

n disk - create and attach "sparse" type volume to a VM, and check the data volume is provisioned as s sparse disk - create and attach "fat" type volume to a VM, and check the data volume is provisioned as s fat disk Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

eck the data volume is provisioned as s sparse disk - create and attach "fat" type volume to a VM, and check the data volume is provisioned as s fat disk Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: Review Request 18027: CLOUDSTACK-6072 vxlan networks not deallocating vnet ids

pache.org/r/18027/#review34495 --- On Feb. 12, 2014, 8:44 p.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://revie

Re: Review Request 17990: a broadcast type of a public network is affected by another physical network's isolation method

pache.org/r/17990/#review34269 --- On Feb. 12, 2014, 4:59 a.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://revie

Re: Difference between "Guest Network" and "Isolated Network" under Advanced Networking

In my understanding, "Guest Network" Sachin said is called "Shared Network" in the document. [1] The word "Guest Network" refers "Shared Network" and "Isolated Network" in some cases. Why don't we avoid using "Guest Network" to point "Shared Network" in GUI? [1] http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/

Re: Review Request 18027: CLOUDSTACK-6072 vxlan networks not deallocating vnet ids

create an additional guest network. 8. deploy a VM that joins 3 existing guest networks. 9. check VNI is reused. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Review Request 18027: CLOUDSTACK-6072 vxlan networks not deallocating vnet ids

is reused. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: Review Request 17990: a broadcast type of a public network is affected by another physical network's isolation method

apache.org/r/17990/diff/ Testing --- Deployed a zone described above, and confirmed it works correctly. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Review Request 17990:

ed to VXLAN by mistake. Diffs - server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java 270ff7b Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17990/diff/ Testing --- Deployed a zone described above, and confirmed it works correctly. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: Code quality, QA, etc

+1 for pre-commit testing. I put pre-commit testing in practice personally, and it helped me a lot. Before I submit a patch, I create a pull request in my github repo. My Jenkins subscribes pull requests by Jenkins plugin for Github and the build result is displayed in Github. I heard there are plu

Re: [RFC] adding volume provisioning method option

Then you can add an overprovisioning factor to fit your >> needs in the config options. >> >> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: >>> Yes, preallocation=metadata creates a large file full of holes. and >>> maybe I need to modify storage con

Re: [RFC] adding volume provisioning method option

l size: 10G (10737418240 bytes) >> disk size: 1.7M >> cluster_size: 65536 >> >> preallocation=metadata leaves disk as 1.7M, it's also sparse, but a bit >> bigger. >> >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Marcus wrote: >>> Yes, no_option.img is o

Re: [RFC] adding volume provisioning method option

rse qcow2. > Just if you want it to NOT be sparse for metadata. > > I also remember hearing that either recent qemu-img has a decent > preallocation by default now, or that performance has improved such > that it doesn't matter. Will need to do some reading to remember, but >

Re: [RFC] adding volume provisioning method option

Hello Nux, Thank you for your comment. I will prepare feature specification. Regards, 2014-01-31 Nux! : > On 31.01.2014 20:24, Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: >> >> Afternoon All, >> >> Is there anyone working on adding volume provisioning method option? >> As you kn

[RFC] adding volume provisioning method option

and start implementation. Regards, Noji Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: Review Request 15247: [DOC] CLOUDSTACK-4967: Add a section to describe VNI allocation matter

-management.xml 21f5461 vxlan/en-US/plugin-vxlan-requirements.xml c2e04a6 vxlan/en-US/plugin-vxlan-revision-history.xml ec04d11 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15247/diff/ Testing --- I generated and confirmed the PDF. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: Review Request 15247: [DOC] CLOUDSTACK-4967: Add a section to describe VNI allocation matter

/en-US/plugin-vxlan-config-hypervisor.xml 2c5e138 vxlan/en-US/plugin-vxlan-config-management.xml 21f5461 vxlan/en-US/plugin-vxlan-revision-history.xml ec04d11 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15247/diff/ Testing --- I generated and confirmed the PDF. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: SDN compat matrix

VXLAN supports VPC networks. It also supports L3 NAT, DHCP and Firewall by utilizing CloudStack Virtual Router funtion for VLAN. -Noji 2013/11/17 Chiradeep Vittal : > Also BigSwitch VNS 4.2 > > -- > Chiradeep > >> On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:40 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >> >> Hey guys, >> >> I’m bui

Re: CloudStack.next

+1 especially to CI process improvement. IMO, we need to improve the patch review process. Sometimes we encounter that the master branch is broken. Low quality commit slows down our developing and testing on the master branch. I think we should change the patch review process to check that a patch

Re: Review Request 15068: Change labels for VLAN to vNet

> On Nov. 4, 2013, 10:24 p.m., Jessica Wang wrote: > > Ship It! > > Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Has this been applied? Yes, it has. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=5ccf3a90abb79eace839a8e61cf950248aa913c8 - Yoshikazu --

Re: Review Request 15296: CLOUDSTACK-5067 Bugfix: two NICs connected to Public network exist in VR

ervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java e3f60f2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15296/diff/ Testing --- I deployed VR, and confirmed it has one NIC connected to Public network. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Review Request 15296: CLOUDSTACK-5067 Bugfix: two NICs connected to Public network exist in VR

eployed VR, and confirmed it has one NIC connected to Public network. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Review Request 15247: [DOC] CLOUDSTACK-4967: Add a section to describe VNI allocation matter

-config-hypervisor.xml 2c5e138 vxlan/en-US/plugin-vxlan-config-management.xml 21f5461 vxlan/en-US/plugin-vxlan-revision-history.xml ec04d11 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15247/diff/ Testing --- I generated and confirmed the PDF. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: Review Request 15238: CLOUDSTACK-5039: bugfix: live migration failed : Domain not found: no domain with matching uuid ''

an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15238/#review28175 ------- On Nov. 5, 2013, 5:17 a.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: > > --- > This i

Review Request 15238: CLOUDSTACK-5039: bugfix: live migration failed : Domain not found: no domain with matching uuid ''

plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java e3f60f2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15238/diff/ Testing --- I confirmed live migration works. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: Review Request 15014: allow physical devices as guest traffic label, vxlan bridge name fix

alled to see if we can get a nic, then check for physical interface if > > no mapping was found to pass it as nic. I'm ok with doing a new method if > > you feel strongly that this needs to be split out. It would be better if it > > were within createVnetBr or wrapped create

Re: Review Request 15014: allow physical devices as guest traffic label, vxlan bridge name fix

> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/15014/ > --- > > (Updated Oct. 29, 2013, 5:51 p.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack, Toshiaki Hatano and Yoshikazu Noj

Re: Review Request 15014: allow physical devices as guest traffic label, vxlan bridge name fix

derstanding, it is trafic type. I think leaving 2nd parameter "nic" and making pif lookup logic outside of this method are better. How do you think? - Yoshikazu Nojima On Oct. 29, 2013, 5:51 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote: > > -

Re: Review Request 15014: allow physical devices as guest traffic label, vxlan bridge name fix

tps://reviews.apache.org/r/15014/#comment53789> '");' seems gone. - Yoshikazu Nojima On Oct. 29, 2013, 4:48 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > h

Re: Review Request 15001: CLOUDSTACK-4967: Bugfix: Guest network isn't created correctly in rare case when vxlan is used for isolation method

> On Oct. 29, 2013, 4:35 a.m., Toshiaki Hatano wrote: > > > > Toshiaki Hatano wrote: > Actual issue is not "the physical interface name length must be shorter > than 5" but "generated bridge name cannot exceed 15 character". > > > Yoshikaz

Re: Review Request 15001: CLOUDSTACK-4967: Bugfix: Guest network isn't created correctly in rare case when vxlan is used for isolation method

> On Oct. 29, 2013, 4:35 a.m., Toshiaki Hatano wrote: > > > > Toshiaki Hatano wrote: > Actual issue is not "the physical interface name length must be shorter > than 5" but "generated bridge name cannot exceed 15 character". > > > Yoshikaz

Re: Review Request 15001: CLOUDSTACK-4967: Bugfix: Guest network isn't created correctly in rare case when vxlan is used for isolation method

--------- On Oct. 29, 2013, 12:51 a.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/15001/ >

Re: Review Request 15001: CLOUDSTACK-4967: Bugfix: Guest network isn't created correctly in rare case when vxlan is used for isolation method

dge name length is not enough. - Yoshikazu --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15001/#review27657 --- On Oct.

Review Request 15012: CLOUDSTACK-4984: decrement MAX_VXLAN_VNI to be aligned with Linux kernel

range via add zone wizard. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Review Request 15001: CLOUDSTACK-4967: Bugfix: Guest network isn't created correctly in rare case when vxlan is used for isolation method

s/kvm/test/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/BridgeVifDriverTest.java PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15001/diff/ Testing --- I confirmed it passes the unit tests I add. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Re: Review Request 14868: CLOUDSTACK-4932: Bugfix: listNetworks API doesn't return vlan id / VNI ( Virtual Network Identifier in VXLAN )

ava f4ca112 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14868/diff/ Testing --- I confirmed appropriate VLAN ID is returned by listNetworks API, and it is displayed in the "Network"/"Guest networks"/"details" tab in CloudStack WebGUI. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

Review Request 14868: Bugfix: listNetworks API doesn't return vlan id / VNI ( Virtual Network Identifier in VXLAN )

ot;Guest networks"/"details" tab in CloudStack WebGUI. Thanks, Yoshikazu Nojima

  1   2   >