GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1176
CLOUDSTACK-9025: Fixed can't create usable template from snapshot in
Xenserver and Vmware
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9025
Fix also reverts below commit
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1174
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1174
CLOUDSTACK-9025: Fixed can't create usable template from snapshot in
Xenserver and Vmware
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9025
Fix also reverts below commit
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1166#discussion_r46673018
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/StorageSystemSnapshotStrategy.java
---
@@ -459,12 +463,8 @@ public
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1176#issuecomment-161927620
@ustcweizhou That bug is already taken care in Ovm3 guru code with commit
66fed46
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/855#issuecomment-161926840
This file could be used while fixing some time taking bugs in Console Proxy
code. It can be used in similar way as described on
https://cwiki.apache.org
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1176#issuecomment-161931232
@ustcweizhou I differ on this. We should not make HypervisorGuruManagerImpl
complex by adding these kind of conditions as nobody is expert of all
hypervisors
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1164#issuecomment-161891307
Created PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1166 for 4.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1166
CLOUDSTACK-8845: Fixed list snapshots command throwing exception
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8845
CLOUDSTACK-8845: Fixed list snapshots command throwing
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1164
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1164
CLOUDSTACK-8845: Fixed list snapshots command throwing exception
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8845
Fixed list snapshots command throwing exception if any one
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1126#issuecomment-161180226
@DaanHoogland I don't understand how json format is helping here?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1126#issuecomment-160938583
@DaanHoogland Could you suggest a better way of putting this information in
API documents in current scenario?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1126
CLOUDSTACK-9088: Update the description for migrateVirtualMachineWithVolume
api
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9088
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/787#issuecomment-147970195
@remibergsma I will add the test if I gets the time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/787#issuecomment-147117991
@remibergsma @bhaisaab Updated the description with testing requirements.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/868#issuecomment-144328947
@runseb Updated the bug description. I am looking into travis tests. This
test will require vGPU enabled hosts with different type of GPU cards.
---
If your
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/868#issuecomment-144341943
@runseb It seems like simulator does't have support for vGPU. If I find
some time then I will try to add support for it.
---
If your project is set up
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793#issuecomment-143647389
Rebased the PR to current master.
Regarding unit tests, method doesn't have input or output as a unit. It has
output only in terms of DB updation so
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/885#issuecomment-143639563
LGTM on the basis of code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/885#issuecomment-143442228
We don't need new method isPowerStateUpToDate(long instanceId) as we are
already performing the same operations in
_instanceDao.updatePowerState(entry.getKey
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/829#issuecomment-142903425
This simply means that there power_state has not changed for that period of
time. As I pointed out in my previous comment that if state is consecutively
updated
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/829#issuecomment-142899514
From code it seems to be getting updated and DB also suggests that. It will
not be updated if there is no power change
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/829#issuecomment-142909650
Yes, increasing time should help.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/829#issuecomment-142920071
I have followed your explanation but what I am trying to say is that it may
get updated due to side effect of some other code as from my experience
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/868
CLOUDSTACK-8894: Restrict vGPU enabled VMs dynamic scaling if new service
offering has different vGPU type
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/829#issuecomment-141613687
@DaanHoogland what update_time are you talking about?
I think as a work around increasing ping interval to some higher value
like 90 sec or 120 seconds
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/835
CLOUDSTACK-8867: Added retry logic to reconnect to host on connection
termination
Also changed viewer/console identifier to vm uuid + vnc port to avoid
using same connection console
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/829#issuecomment-140665483
Currently we report only PowerOn VMs and do not report PowerOff VMs that's
why we consider Missing and PowerOff as same And that's how whole code is
written
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793#discussion_r39367811
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/vm/snapshot/VMSnapshotManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1046,4 +1046,51 @@ private VmWorkJobVO createPlaceHolderWork(long
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793#issuecomment-139989420
@karuturi I don't get what will be validate by adding above kind of tests
other than what I have mentioned in my previous comment.
---
If your project is set up
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793#issuecomment-139975023
@bhaisaab Here we are just accessing and updating the DB and not much logic
is involved. So I can think of tests which does data validation of DB which
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/804#issuecomment-139968967
Attached the screenshots to ticket.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/803#discussion_r39361975
--- Diff:
engine/storage/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/image/db/VolumeDataStoreDaoImpl.java
---
@@ -350,4 +351,20 @@ public void
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/802
Fixed secstorage.proxy is not setting proxy configuration on SSVM in some
cases
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/804
CLOUDSTACK-8834: Fixed unable to download Template , when in multi zones
We were listing image stores by zone id which was resulting in listing of
only one image store
If in that image
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793
CLOUDSTACK-8827: Move the VM snapshots stuck in transitional states to
stable states during managment server restart
i.e. If snapshot in creating state move it to Error state
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/787
CLOUDSTACK-8825, CLOUDSTACK-8824 : Fixed issues if vm.allocation.algorithm
is set to firstfitleastconsumed
Fixed following issues if vm.allocation.algorithm is set to
firstfitleastconsumed
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/673#discussion_r37964980
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -2188,7 +2188,13 @@ public UserVm updateVirtualMachine(UpdateVMCmd cmd)
throws
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/673#discussion_r37964142
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/vm/UpdateVMCmd.java ---
@@ -136,13 +136,13 @@ public String getInstanceName
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/673#issuecomment-134931329
@bhaisaab Lost in discussion and got only end result that all we need is
here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/673#issuecomment-134925254
@bhaisaab What else is needed here?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/673#issuecomment-134938776
@remibergsma @bhaisaab Remi has already tested this and has given the LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/700#issuecomment-132186831
@DaanHoogland That doesn't seems to be the case here. I believe if somebody
has to change unit test with every change then that unit test is burden and
should
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/700#issuecomment-132438972
@rafaelweingartner @DaanHoogland If the purpose is to make sure that path
is not modified by other developer then adding note/comment on top of that line
makes
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/672#issuecomment-131736170
@remibergsma First part of snapshot improvements is not yet implemented.
To test verify following operations
VM snapshots and volume snapshots
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/351#issuecomment-132072709
@DaanHoogland Updated the code with review comments.
Regarding unit tests I am identifying modules for which unit tests can be
written. But be aware
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/700#issuecomment-132067886
@cristofolini @DaanHoogland Are these unit tests adding any value? What
type of value are they adding here? To me these seems to be burden on
maintainer
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/351#issuecomment-131724787
@remibergsma Either we have to squash all commits to one commit or leave it
as it is. In squashing all commits to one I will put all the relevant messages
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#issuecomment-131683677
@sedukull , Can you give a LGTM now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/672#issuecomment-131674635
@remibergsma Updated the description with bug link. These commits covers
only second part i.e. allowing volume and VM snapshots to exist together.
---
If your
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/351#issuecomment-131678148
Updated the code as per review comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/351#issuecomment-130996684
Unit test which is failing is testing KVM code and is not related to any
changes in this file
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36949815
--- Diff: client/pom.xml ---
@@ -478,6 +478,12 @@
copy
todir=${basedir}/target/generated-webapp/WEB-INF/classes/scripts
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/351#issuecomment-130973969
Removed the MigrateCompleteCommand as per review comments
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36833745
--- Diff: client/pom.xml ---
@@ -478,6 +478,12 @@
copy
todir=${basedir}/target/generated-webapp/WEB-INF/classes/scripts
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36710980
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/consoleproxy/ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1425,19 +1423,39 @@ public boolean finalizeCommandsOnStart(Commands
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r3676
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/consoleproxy/ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1425,19 +1423,39 @@ public boolean finalizeCommandsOnStart(Commands
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36711314
--- Diff: systemvm/js/ajaxviewer.js ---
@@ -184,7 +205,7 @@ KeyboardMapper.prototype = {
if(eventType == AjaxViewer.KEY_UP
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/673#issuecomment-129696884
@remibergsma Using cloudmonkey we can pass as shown below
update virtualmachine id=00f19661-da81-40b2-a07c-e46967421195
details[0].keyboard=fr
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36710619
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/wrapper/LibvirtCopyFileInVmCommandWrapper.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36710924
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/wrapper/LibvirtCopyFileInVmCommandWrapper.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36710950
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/hyperv/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/hyperv/resource/HypervDirectConnectResource.java
---
@@ -595,6 +597,25 @@ private
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36611140
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/hyperv/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/hyperv/resource/HypervDirectConnectResource.java
---
@@ -595,6 +597,25 @@ private
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36612331
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/consoleproxy/ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1425,19 +1423,39 @@ public boolean finalizeCommandsOnStart(Commands
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36611014
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
---
@@ -1279,6 +1285,27 @@ private static DiskTO
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36611046
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
---
@@ -1279,6 +1285,27 @@ private static DiskTO
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36611296
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/wrapper/LibvirtCopyFileInVmCommandWrapper.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36609278
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/wrapper/LibvirtCopyFileInVmCommandWrapper.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36612463
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/hyperv/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/hyperv/resource/HypervDirectConnectResource.java
---
@@ -595,6 +597,25 @@ private
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669#discussion_r36612869
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/wrapper/LibvirtCopyFileInVmCommandWrapper.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/672
Allow VM snapshots and volume snapshots to exist together
This branch fixes issues involved in allowing VM snapshots and volume
snapshots to exist together.
You can merge this pull request
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669
Made the adding new keyboard language support easier
This branch has implemented following improvements in console proxy
keyboard language support
1) ajaxviewer.js and ajaxkeys.js
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/673#issuecomment-129407249
cloudstack-pull-requests #945 failure is because of some random error in
git fetching
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/673
CLOUDSTACK-8721: Fixed Setting details of VM through API results in removal
of all other details except the one passed in API
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/351#issuecomment-129292846
@remibergsma,
Rebased the branch to latest master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/660#issuecomment-128231212
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/351#issuecomment-125090049
Rebased the code to latest master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/351#issuecomment-121174974
@runseb These are false failures. The changes on which these tests are
failing are in Hyper-V agent so can be safely ignored as these tests are not
testing Hyper
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/466#issuecomment-113046025
Yes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/351
This branch implements the CSV and native HA support for Hyper-V
For design related details refer to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/iSCSI+and+HA+support+in+Hyper-V
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/214
CLOUDSTACK-8431: [Hyper-V] Fixed VM deployment failing when the stale vhd
already exists
Now generating guid when the template copy from secondary to primary
storage requested instead
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/204
CLOUDSTACK-8423: [Xenserver] Improved the performance for processing of
ClusterVMMetaDataSync command
Current way of processing can cause slowness in DB if there are huge
number of VMs
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/198
CLOUDSTACK-8418: [Hyper-V] use systemvm.iso from secondary storage
use systemvm.iso from secondary storage and stop copying to local disk
You can merge this pull request into a Git
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/202
CLOUDSTACK-8422: Fixed unable to delete zone from CCP
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/anshul1886/cloudstack-1 CLOUDSTACK
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/200
CLOUDSTACK-8419: [Hyper-V] corrected the wrong error message in stop
command answer
corrected the wrong error message in stop command answer
You can merge this pull request into a Git
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/197
CLOUDSTACK-8417 : [Hyper-V] Added support for smb share path in Hyper-V
settings virtual disk path
Added support for smb share path in Hyper-V settings virtual disk path
You can merge
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/201
CLOUDSTACK-8420: [Hyper-V] Fixed number format exception when untagged vlan
is used for Hyper-V setup
Change the vlan data type to string from int and handled the untagged vlan
cases
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/194
CLOUDSTACK-8413: Fixed resource tags on disk are lost when migrate to
another storage
During cold volume migration we are duplicating volume entry in volumes
table.
When migration
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/195
CLOUDSTACK-8414: [Hyper-V] Fixed template_spool_ref table is not getting
updated with correct template size
Fixed template_spool_ref table is not getting updated with correct template
size
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/196
CLOUDSTACK-8416: added support for FIPS compliant checksum.
It will now support md5, sha1, sha224, sha256, sha384 and sha512 checksums.
In same checksum parameter user can pass any
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/68#issuecomment-71788178
Yes. It seems travis CI errored out before running any tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/68
CLOUDSTACK-6900: This fixes volume migration failing after that volume is
downloaded
When we download volume then we create entry in volume_store_ref table.
We mark the volume entry
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/68#issuecomment-70239302
If not download_url than there needs to be other entry in db to detect the
difference type of entries. But that will require the DB change and will not
achieve any
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/68#issuecomment-70241529
Yes it will always be null for migration entries.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/64
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/64
CLOUDSTACK-6900: Fixed if we download a volume and then migrate the same
volume, then migration fails
In findByStoreVolume method of VolumeDataStoreDao now listing only those
volumes whose
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/56
CLOUDSTACK-8067: Fixed NPEs in MS log related to console proxy VM
Fixed NPEs in MS log related to console proxy VM
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/31
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/31#issuecomment-63287776
closing pull request as this got merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
201 - 300 of 318 matches
Mail list logo
