Disabling a zone should stop the systemVMs from re-spawning? Agree
that's probably less than ideal, but allows for taking corrective
action in the meantime.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:13:20AM +0800, Mice Xia wrote:
> if remember correctly, by design disabling a cluster will stop user VM
> deploy i
if remember correctly, by design disabling a cluster will stop user VM
deploy in this cluster but does not exclude it from systemvm's destination;
and vmware based cluster is always chosen as the destination when vmware
systemvm template is ready. this should be a bug, primary storage's status
shou
On May 29, 2013, at 9:33 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> Certainly the behavior is not robust.
Understated but accurate. ;)
>
> On 5/29/13 10:35 AM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote:
>
>> Before I file this as a bug, I would like to understand if this is a bug
>> or by-design.
>>
>> Summary:
>> Many times,
Certainly the behavior is not robust.
On 5/29/13 10:35 AM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote:
>Before I file this as a bug, I would like to understand if this is a bug
>or by-design.
>
>Summary:
>Many times, the initial zone deployment may fail because incorrect values
>were used during configuration proces
Before I file this as a bug, I would like to understand if this is a bug or
by-design.
Summary:
Many times, the initial zone deployment may fail because incorrect values were
used during configuration process. The CS management server will go in cycles
over and over again, attempting to use imp
