Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@PaulAngus @jburwell I've added more changes and rebased. now My tests are
now running without errors. I did add the ` --config
global{metadata_read_only=0} ` as suggested by @PaulAngus and did not
Github user ArmedGuy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@PaulAngus --config is not persistent, but helpfully overrides
metadata_read_only = 1 which is set in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf on XS7. But I second
that `--config global{metadata_read_only=0}` is need
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@jburwell I have reviewed all the smoke tests and I have not found at any
place we skipping because of a version mismatch so we are good there. I still
have to figure out why some of the tests are
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@syed +1 -- I would like to see a full component test run for this PR on XS
7 and smoke tests for XS 6.5. Also, we might want to consider a PR for 4.9 and
then another PR for master like we di
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@jburwell Got it. I want to stabilize the tests and once everything looks
green here. I will open a PR against 4.9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@syed given that XenServer 6.5 doesn't run on newer hardware, XenServer
users don't have a realistic LTS release. Therefore, I propose that this PR be
targeted to the 4.9 branch and forward me
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@rhtyd @PaulAngus I will verify the failed tests (except VPC and private
gateway) and update this. It would be nice if we can get this into 4.10
---
If your project is set up for it, you can repl
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
Trillian test result (tid-192)
Environment: CUSTOM-XenServer (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 35929 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueora
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
Trillian test result (tid-183)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 32182 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoran
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
One small comment, rest of the code LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: Xenserver7 Support
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@PaulAngus would it be possible to run another round of tests on this?
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@PaulAngus would it be possible to run another round of tests on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-69
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@PaulAngus
`test_volumes:TestCreateVolume.test_01_create_volume`
I've tested the failed checks. I found a problem with the marvin check that
was doing size check. I've modified it
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@PaulAngus I'm running the tests that failed for you on my setup. I will
update with what I find.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
Results from smoke tests (with above iscsi fix in)
Test completed. 41 look ok, 7 have error(s)
in addition to the the known VPC issues there are:
test_07_resize_fail |
Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
test_primary_storage.py fails iSCSI test.
**Marvin resports:** createstoragepool failed, due to: errorCode: 530,
errorText:Failed to add data store: Failed to access storage pool
**clo
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@koushik-das Thank you for the review! I've added the guest OS mappings and
hypervisor capabilities.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-63
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
There was an env issue with the debian package job, it has been re-fired.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-62
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
Thanks @syed for your PR. I'll kick some tests following merge of PR #1708.
@PaulAngus can add support for XenServer 7 in Trillian, thanks.
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project
27 matches
Mail list logo
