[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-04-13 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 @ProjectMoon Jenkins and CI is passed, Can you please give LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-04-11 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 Jenkins got timed out. I am force pushing again to trigger jenkins. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-04-11 Thread ProjectMoon
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 Looks good now. Not sure what's up with Jenkins though. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-03-19 Thread cloudmonger
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 3 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=623 Failed=290 Skipped=58 _Link to logs Folder

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-03-09 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 @jayapalu can you change the PR base branch to 4.9? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-03-06 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 @ProjectMoon Can you please review it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-03-03 Thread ProjectMoon
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 Hi, that's great news. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-03-02 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 @ProjectMoon I have today this PR after rebasing latest master. I did not observe the add:true for the removed ip. Here is output from the ips.json and ip addr show output.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-03-01 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 @ProjectMoon The ip issue can be worked as separate ticket/PR. It is an isolated issue, it is not having any dependency with this PR. So we will get this PR in and create a separate ticket

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-03-01 Thread ProjectMoon
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 @jayapalu Quite possible, yes. It could be fixed by adding another condition to the check that was added with #1907. It could also be "fixed" by checkiing if `configured()` returns `True`

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-02-28 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 @ProjectMoon I have seen the issue of ips.json having the "add:true" while I am testing this PR. I tested this PR by manually removing the ip or setting add to false. Also I tested with

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-02-28 Thread ProjectMoon
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 We have been testing this PR internally for some time now, and we have seen some strange `arping` issues. We have seen that `/etc/cloudstack/ips.json` on the router has IPs on them that

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-02-28 Thread ProjectMoon
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 I'm looking at the `DataBag` code, and it seems that it loads information from the data located at `/etc/cloudstack/` and therefore 1907 should work fine with this, ASSUMING that is smart

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-02-28 Thread ProjectMoon
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 Question: would #1907 be relevant to this? That change relied on sending all the IPs to the router, but under this change, we will be sending one at a time. --- If your project is set up

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1908: CLOUDSTACK-9317: Fixed disable static nat on leaving...

2017-01-17 Thread ProjectMoon
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908 Thanks for adding the missing parts. Here is the PR that was open against 4.8 for this, which I guess can be closed now: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623 I guess the