Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-151795514
LGTM, based on a set of tests that I run on this branch (which I rebased
myself first):
```
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s -
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-151027065
@mike-tutkowski currently only RM can merge, so I'll do that once the
criteria are met. I need 2x LGTM and some tests run on this branch. So far, I
see only a LG
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-151018044
Are we OK with this PR, everyone? If so, at this point in the release, is
it the job of the RM to merge or should I do that? Thanks!
---
If your project is s
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150954369
@remibergsma I destroyed the vms in which I ran it already.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150947060
@DaanHoogland Could you please paste the nose command you run and the
output. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150842979
I'm not at my computer right now, but I should be able to perform the
rebase later this afternoon.
On Saturday, October 24, 2015, Daan Hoogland
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150840869
@remibergsma I ran the ssvm and vpc tests in the env from your company and
we'll have to trust Mike for the solidfire specifics. He'll have to fix broken
stuff
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150839822
@mike-tutkowski Please rebase with current master and then force-push your
commits.
If you find another reviewer, I can run some tests next week to see i
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150802473
@mike-tutkowski you'll have to force push i thinks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150701469
@DaanHoogland How do I restart that build (the one that failed due to a
timeout)? Can I do it from this UI or do I have to go elsewhere? Thanks!
---
If your
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150678276
Perhaps the management server serializes delete commands that it sends
to a given
plug-in.
On Friday, October 23, 2015, Mike Tutkowski
wro
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150677439
I have actually not witnessed any issue with concurrent deletions. I've run
tests on that and they passed just fine.
On Friday, October 23, 2015, p
Github user pdube commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150675450
@mike-tutkowski Thanks. That makes more sense now. So concurrent deletions
would still be a problem?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150663033
@DaanHoogland At present, I don't have any way to run SolidFire integration
tests inside of the Apache community. Perhaps I can leverage a virtual
appliance a
Github user pdube commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150575383
The fix looks like it will work, but it seems like it is just a workaround.
Shouldn't the column be updated correctly instead?
Either in this method or the oth
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150490749
checked with the regular tests of the SBP integration test suits and there
all pass (except for the vp offering things) @mike-tutkowski Do you have any
recommen
GitHub user mike-tutkowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968
CLOUDSTACK-8985: Deleted volume's removed column not updated
I found this issue when a SolidFire integration test yesterday wasn't able
to delete primary storage because it claimed there
18 matches
Mail list logo
