Re: [PROPOSAL] Virtual Router aggregated execution

2014-02-07 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
+1. * The guideline is not clear as to when a developer should use this executor. Why not use it all the time (even for a single command) * Are there any issues when there are multiple management servers involved? * Any threading concerns? That is, multiple threads are attempting to update the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Virtual Router aggregated execution

2014-02-07 Thread Sheng Yang
Thanks for the comment! On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: +1. * The guideline is not clear as to when a developer should use this executor. Why not use it all the time (even for a single command) The mechanism behind is NOT a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Virtual Router aggregated execution

2014-02-07 Thread Sheng Yang
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote: Thanks for the comment! On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: +1. * The guideline is not clear as to when a developer should use this executor. Why not use it all the time

[PROPOSAL] Virtual Router aggregated execution

2014-02-06 Thread Sheng Yang
Hi Devs, Here I'd like to introduce this improvement of VR. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6047 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Virtual+Router+aggregated+command+execution In short, we would speed up VR's rebooting and re-creating, by aggregated

Re: [PROPOSAL] Virtual Router aggregated execution

2014-02-06 Thread Chip Childers
On Feb 6, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote: Hi Devs, Here I'd like to introduce this improvement of VR. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6047 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Virtual+Router+aggregated+command+execution In