Hi all,
After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.3.1 *passes* with 3 PMC votes and 2
non-PMC votes.
I could not count Wei and Erik, who did not specifically vote.
+1 (PMC / binding)
Wido
Mike T.
Ilya
+1 (non-binding)
Rohit
Nux
Thanks to everyone participating.
I will now prepare the release
+1 (binding)
Tested RHEL 6.3 MS with XS 6.2 (fresh install). Followed test procedure
(s/4.3.0/4.3.1) to verify bits and hash.
--
Chiradeep
On Sep 11, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 11, 2014, at 3:56 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry I
Upgraded one of my test environments, no issues found so far +1 binding.
On 9/11/14, 4:07 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
Based on my regression testing, I am +1.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sep 11, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Mike Tutkowski
On 12-Sep-2014, at 6:43 am, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we have an official upgrade path for those who want to upgrade?
Upgrade path exists between 4.3.0 and 4.3.1, and in 4.4 branch from 4.3.1 to
4.4.1.
To upgrade systemvms, you can add an new template or register/seed the
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:31 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
I don't know if packaging issues is relevant or not, but rpms require
openjdk 1.6 rather than 1.7, which makes the kvm agent unable to start.
Hi Erik,
On 11-Sep-2014, at 10:11 am, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if packaging issues is relevant or not, but rpms require
openjdk 1.6 rather than 1.7, which makes the kvm agent unable to start.
[root@cloud-lab-node3 cloudstack]# cat agent/cloudstack-agent.err
4:31:09 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 round #4
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
Commit
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi Erik,
On 11-Sep-2014, at 10:11 am, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if packaging issues is relevant or not, but rpms require
openjdk 1.6 rather than 1.7, which makes the kvm agent unable to
On 11-Sep-2014, at 11:10 am, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
I'm going to try upgrading an existing 4.3.0 env, do we also need to upgrade
the SystemVMs?
Ideally, yes
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter:
I'll revert my initial message.
Making sure the RPMs are built with openjdk 1.6 does indeed work, so this
is a build issue.
This is however something that could bite someone though.
The spec requires openjdk 1.6 to build, but you can easily have both 1.6
and 1.7 installed and have it built with
:44 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 round #4
On 11-Sep-2014, at 11:10 am, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
I'm going to try upgrading an existing 4.3.0 env, do we also need to
upgrade the SystemVMs?
Ideally, yes
On 11-Sep-2014, at 2:06 pm, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
The spec requires openjdk 1.6 to build, but you can easily have both 1.6
and 1.7 installed and have it built with 1.7 if that is your default java,
am I correct?
I'm not saying this should warrant the vote to fail, just want
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
On 11-Sep-2014, at 2:06 pm, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
The spec requires openjdk 1.6 to build, but you can easily have both 1.6
and 1.7 installed and have it built with 1.7 if that is your default
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hello,
I've upgraded and it looks ok for now.
I have used these system VMs
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm/ and
added them as systemvm-kvm-4.3 in the Templates.
I expected them to replace
As far as I know, there is no systemvm change during upgrade from 4.3.0 to
4.3.1
2014-09-11 15:22 GMT+02:00 Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hello,
I've upgraded and it looks ok for now.
I have used these system VMs
Sent: Thursday, 11 September, 2014 2:44:57 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 round #4
As far as I know, there is no systemvm change during upgrade from 4.3.0 to
4.3.1
2014-09-11 15:22 GMT+02:00 Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Nux! n
Except heartbleed fix.
I was merely checking if it's even poosible to do an automated upgrade.
The way i know the upgrade process we add some sql magic to check for new
systemvm templates. If that's not made for 4.3.1 it won't do much good to
add it as systemvm-hypervisor-version.
Erik
11. sep.
I have an integration test failing when trying to create a (XenServer)
storage repository.
Let me look into it for an hour or so and then I can respond back as to if
it's a code issue.
I'm thinking now it's a problem with XAPI. At first the code wasn't
compiling due to XAPI changes and now I'm
OK, I looked into this more.
It turns out the regression test that was failing is only valid in 4.4 and
beyond, so it is not a valid test for 4.3.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I have an integration test failing when trying to create a
Sorry I just notice Rohit made a systemvm template change (commit
3a0f1550289a8a2a50b0f786821cec2e5c914e62) on 9th, September.
The systemvm template will be built based on debian 7.5.0 instead of 7.4.0
==
commit 3a0f1550289a8a2a50b0f786821cec2e5c914e62
Author: Rohit Yadav
On Sep 11, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
OK, I looked into this more.
It turns out the regression test that was failing is only valid in 4.4 and
beyond, so it is not a valid test for 4.3.
so can you vote ? we need your binding vote :)
On Thu, Sep
On Sep 11, 2014, at 3:56 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry I just notice Rohit made a systemvm template change (commit
3a0f1550289a8a2a50b0f786821cec2e5c914e62) on 9th, September.
The systemvm template will be built based on debian 7.5.0 instead of 7.4.0
Wei, can you test and
Based on my regression testing, I am +1.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sep 11, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
OK, I looked into this more.
It turns out the regression test that was failing is only
HI,
On 11-Sep-2014, at 9:56 pm, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry I just notice Rohit made a systemvm template change (commit
3a0f1550289a8a2a50b0f786821cec2e5c914e62) on 9th, September.
The systemvm template will be built based on debian 7.5.0 instead of 7.4.0
The quoted commit and
Do we have an official upgrade path for those who want to upgrade?
Erik
12. sep. 2014 01:15 skrev Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
følgende:
HI,
On 11-Sep-2014, at 9:56 pm, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry I just notice Rohit made a systemvm template change (commit
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
Commit: 1687bcdd9b8de1e372b308dffda5bf819b5c4296
List of changes:
+1 for me based on the fact that the Debian packages build fine and the
changelog says 4.3.1
I currently don't have a 4.3 dev environment available, so I wasn't able
to test the functionality.
Wido
On 09/10/2014 05:31 PM, sebgoa wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.1 release, with the
+1 installed on KVM, tested with basic zone, vm lifecycles and other things as
recommended in the release test procedure but with KVM only.
New deb/rpm repo built out of this voting candidate (4.3.1-voting-04) can be
found and used from here:
http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/main/
On
28 matches
Mail list logo
