: Wei ZHOU
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2021 15:15
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: CentOS 8 EOL
Agree with Daan.
Actually we do not need to make any code change to drop centos8 support, we
just need to update the document
https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/releasenotes
Weitergabe oder Nutzung des Inhalts untersagt. Bitte
> > > informieren Sie in diesem Fall unverzüglich den Absender und löschen
> Sie
> > > die E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) von Ihrem
> > System.
> > > Vielen Dank.
> > >
> >
twaiger beigefügter Dateien) von Ihrem
> System.
> > Vielen Dank.
> >
> > The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential
> > and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of
> > this e-mail, any disclosure, copying, di
this e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents
> is strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately
> and then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you.
>
>
> Von: Ron Wheeler
> Gesendet: Monday, D
, December 20, 2021 8:54:25 PM
An: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: CentOS 8 EOL
If you are suggesting that ACS picked a version of Linux, supported it
with an update repo and guaranteed that it would run forever under ACS
as long as you kept up with the ACS published updates, that might solv
If you are suggesting that ACS picked a version of Linux, supported it
with an update repo and guaranteed that it would run forever under ACS
as long as you kept up with the ACS published updates, that might solve
a lot of problems for system administrators.
At least there would be a "recommende
All/any,
Realistically, since CentOS Stream doesn't have minor versions, I'm
not really sure how you *could* support it. It would be like supporting
CentOS 7.0-7.9, but not knowing which version someone is running. You'd
have to only support the "latest" version as of , which might
be chaos.
IMHO we should not drop support for CentOS Stream, at least not yet.
I do not see any of the other clones becoming properly established or
vetted, in fact it's rather tragi-comical that at this point in time the
most respectable clone is in fact Oracle's..
My 2p
On 2021-12-16 16:40, Nicolas
I was not contemplating leaving Linux so your notes about other Linux
options is very relevant.
It sounds like you are not concerned that CentOS Stream will be part of
the QA process for RHEL and have occasional hiccups when updates are
issued to the LTS version.
Ron
On 2021-12-20 06:51, n
Hi Ron,
I wouldn't worry about it as much. Although the PR was "managed"
horribly by RedHat, in technical terms I don't think the situation is as
dire as it seems.
First of all, CentOS Stream is supported for 5 years, this is as good as
Ubuntu LTS and knowing RedHat the QA will be much bette
As a long-time Centos user, I fear that my company will have to abandon
Centos since Centos is going from a stable, tested system to a test bed.
This is not really a good move for anyone wanting a reliable production
system.
It is hard to imaging why anyone would want Centos Steam for product
Hi all,
CentOS 8 will reach EOL on 31st December this year -
https://www.centos.org/centos-linux-eol/
Opening this thread for discussion on the actions needed: should we drop
support on the next 4.16.1 release and onwards?
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
rhtyd merged pull request #173:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
rhtyd commented on a change in pull request #173:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173#discussion_r550419777
##
File path: source/releasenotes/compat.rst
##
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ Supported OS Versions for Management Server
This section lists the operat
GabrielBrascher commented on a change in pull request #173:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173#discussion_r550205055
##
File path: source/releasenotes/compat.rst
##
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ Supported OS Versions for Management Server
This section lists
ACSGitBot commented on pull request #173:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173#issuecomment-752475972
Build finished. You can review it at:
https://acs-www.shapeblue.com/docs/WIP-PROOFING/pr173//
Build Log Output:
No log errors found to repo
ACSGitBot commented on pull request #173:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173#issuecomment-752472759
Your request had been received, i'll go and build the documentation and
check the output log for errors.
This shouldn't take long.
rhtyd commented on pull request #173:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173#issuecomment-752472654
requesting docbuild
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the me
rhtyd opened a new pull request #173:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/173
This adds notes in release notes's compatibilty matrix page and about page.
This is an automated message from the Apache G
19 matches
Mail list logo
