Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
Sent: 28 March 2014 15:00
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Daan Hoogland; Donal Lafferty
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL][Merge] Windowsfication of management server
Let me send broader categories that can be shared, meanwhile if you have some
preference, pl
citrix.com]
Sent: 28 March 2014 15:00
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Daan Hoogland; Donal Lafferty
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL][Merge] Windowsfication of management server
Let me send broader categories that can be shared, meanwhile if you have some
preference, pl do post it.
-Original Message
]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 4:07 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Daan Hoogland; Donal Lafferty
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL][Merge] Windowsfication of management server
I'm happy to help with documentation for this and doing testing, maybe some
packaging. I can certainly host installers if
x.hitch...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 March 2014 10:06
> To: Hugo Trippaers
> Cc: dev; Donal Lafferty
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][Merge] Windowsfication of management server
>
> Is th
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL][Merge] Windowsfication of management server
Sudha,
Yes - that sounds like a good idea.
How do you think it best to draw up a to-do list or tasks?
Regards
Alex Hitchins
D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
peblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 March 2014 10:06
> To: Hugo Trippaers
> Cc: dev; Donal Lafferty
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][Merge] Windowsfication of management server
>
> Is there a notion of silent preview (pos
...@citrix.com]
Sent: 28 March 2014 14:47
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Daan Hoogland; Donal Lafferty
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL][Merge] Windowsfication of management server
Alex,
Glad to hear that you are interested in validation aspects for this feature. We
are also interested. Not to cover the
] Windowsfication of management server
Is there a notion of silent preview (possible) in our release scheme?
Maybe accompanied with a big nullification of warranty. It seems we don't have
anything like 'experimental'; a class of features that maybe removed for
reasons explicable
sage-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 5:27 PM
To: Abhinandan Prateek
Cc: ; Donal Lafferty
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][Merge] Windowsfication of management server
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
> This was proposed as p
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
> This was proposed as per laid down norms
quality is the only norm, Abhi. Can we make this of high enough
quality as to not introduce bugs in other parts of the system or to
hold back the next release as much as we did this one? The
al
This was proposed as per laid down norms and then merge request was sent on
time. It took time to incorporate all the requested changes.
This is going to provide basis for a full blown feature and as such we should
include the commits in 4.4.
-abhi
> On 28-Mar-2014, at 3:13 pm, "Hugo Trippae
ferty
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][Merge] Windowsfication of management server
Hey,
4.4 is in feature freeze, so no new features will be added. I think its fair to
debate if this is a feature in that sense. It seems like minor changes and the
addition of a few scripts, making it a simple change in my
Is there a notion of silent preview (possible) in our release scheme?
Maybe accompanied with a big nullification of warranty. It seems we
don't have anything like 'experimental'; a class of features that
maybe removed for reasons explicable to the greater public. It seems
like whatever we do we wil
Hey,
4.4 is in feature freeze, so no new features will be added. I think its fair to
debate if this is a feature in that sense. It seems like minor changes and the
addition of a few scripts, making it a simple change in my view. It would be
great to be able to announce this, but for it to be pa
It will be really nice to get the preview code for windowsfication in 4.4.
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/
The changes are well segregated.
-abhi
On 28/03/14 10:26 am, "Damoder Reddy" wrote:
>Hugo,
>
> Can Windowsfication be cherry-picked to 4.4 from master ? It is now
>well reviewed and t
15 matches
Mail list logo
