On Wed, Mar 20, 2013, at 10:42 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> I've noticed that some of the projects separate discussions between dev
> and general administrative items via a general@ and a dev@ list. For
> example, the last email I sent was about project meta-data. It's not
> specifically about deve
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> I've noticed that some of the projects separate discussions between dev
> and general administrative items via a general@ and a dev@ list. For
> example, the last email I sent was about project meta-data. It's not
> specifically about deve
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 3:36 PM
> To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] create a general@ mailing list?
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Chip Childers
> wrot
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013, at 05:45 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> To me the dev list is already a general list. I rather see more topic
> oriented lists like: dev-network, dev-storage, dev-hypervisor.
What happens if a topic crosses over between storage, networking and
hypervisors (or some subset)? I think
..@zonker.net]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 3:54 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] create a general@ mailing list?
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013, at 05:45 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> > To me the dev list is already a general list. I rather see more topic
> &g
people that the feature is cross components.
>
> --Alex
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
> > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 3:54 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] create a general@ mailing lis
P.S. Chip, I would consider asking on general@hadoop.a.o about this...
On 21 March 2013 03:42, Chip Childers wrote:
> I've noticed that some of the projects separate discussions between dev
> and general administrative items via a general@ and a dev@ list. For
> example, the last email I sent
oah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org]
Sent: 26 March 2013 09:51
To: cloudstack
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] create a general@ mailing list?
P.S. Chip, I would consider asking on general@hadoop.a.o about this...
On 21 March 2013 03:42, Chip Childers wrote:
> I've noticed that some of the
really have users in the traditional sense)
>
>
> Kind Regards
> Giles
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055
> giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org]
> Sent: 26 March 2013 09:51
> T
>> D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055
>> giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org]
>> Sent: 26 March 2013 09:51
>> To: cloudstack
>> Subject: Re: [DIS
I agree completely with your statement David.
-kd
>-Original Message-
>From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 3:36 PM
>To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] create a general@ mailing list?
>
>On Wed, Mar
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 06:36:25PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > I've noticed that some of the projects separate discussions between dev
> > and general administrative items via a general@ and a dev@ list. For
> > example, the last email
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 09:57 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Given that we have a mix of responses to this question (some for it and
> some against it), and that the pattern seems to be tied to the unliked
> practice of creating umbrella communities, I believe that we should not
> make the change wit
+1 from me as well. It duplicates or segregates, neither of which seem like a
positive change.
-kd
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 28, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 09:57 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>> Given that we have a mix of responses to this question (some f
Just a note that the previous two +1 votes are actually -1 votes in the
context of the DISCUSS topic.
I am also ready to cast my -1 vote.
On 28 March 2013 16:56, Kelceydamage@bbits wrote:
> +1 from me as well. It duplicates or segregates, neither of which seem
> like a positive change.
>
> -kd
15 matches
Mail list logo
