Animesh,
As I understand it the API isn't causing breaking changes where I thought it
was, so I revert my -1 on the issue.
Regards
Alex Hitchins
D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi
: woensdag 12 februari 2014 11:52
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Kishan Kavala; Murali Reddy; Daan Hoogland; daan Hoogland
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Adding Murali as well.
Daan I am not sure if there was any specific work done on this during 4.3 to
cause
@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Kishan Kavala; Murali Reddy; daan Hoogland
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
I can confirm that it also exists in master. Unfortunately it is not high on
my
prio list right now. We have a pressing bug hurting us in our production
systems that I will get
@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Murali Reddy; daan Hoogland
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Daan,
I couldn't repo CLOUDSTACK-6069 in my regular VPC setup. Does this happen
only when using mixed setup with Nicira?
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl
On 13.02.2014 05:28, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
1. CLOUDSTACK-6083 : Missing CIDRs in firewall rules after upgrade
= Waiting on Jayapal to confirm and update the list with findings
Jayapal's fix works for me.
3. CLOUDSTACK-6065: KVM HA not working for shutdown VMs
= While an issue but my
Guys `n' dolls,
while i detected some changed behavure in using the api I am still
retracting my -1. The code that worked before was not intended to
work. I managed to execute my fourth test successfully
regards
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 13.02.2014 05:28,
Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Murali Reddy; daan Hoogland
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Yes it does,
Two guest networks both tagged. system net offer isn't tagged. that's why it
is strange it used to work.
-Original Message-
From: Kishan
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 3:12 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round) UPDATE
On 13.02.2014 05:28, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
1. CLOUDSTACK-6083 : Missing CIDRs
3. CLOUDSTACK-6065: KVM HA not working for shutdown VMs = While
an
issue but my understanding is it is a corner scenario only affecting
KVM and can be released as a known issue
Well, it's effectively breaking HA as defined in the docs for a main
hv type and as it is I can't use
On 13.02.2014 23:01, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
3. CLOUDSTACK-6065: KVM HA not working for shutdown VMs = While
an
issue but my understanding is it is a corner scenario only
affecting
KVM and can be released as a known issue
Well, it's effectively breaking HA as defined in the docs for a
Tested on latest devcloud, found no issues either. So, +1.
Santhosh
From: Amogh Vasekar [amogh.vase...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:06 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
+1
Tested
...@citrix.com]
Sent: 12 February 2014 11:06
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Tested on latest devcloud, found no issues either. So, +1.
Santhosh
From: Amogh Vasekar [amogh.vase...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday
February 2014 12:14
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
-1
See dev list thread 'Re: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)'
There seem to be some API syntax changes/additions which mean passing an array
of details i.e
details[0].key=details
On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
+1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, KVM,
NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
I'm also making it -1, based on
To: dev
Cc: Kishan Kavala
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6069
I will try in master as well. And look for a solution there.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
-1
As below - I don't think this can go out given it breaks API on a non-major
release.
Regards
Alex Hitchins
D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
Hi Animesh,
I am able to reproduce the cidr issue.
I will commit the fix it in an hour.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 13-Feb-2014, at 10:58 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
While the official 72 hours or rather 3 weekdays for this VOTE has passed and
we have required +1
On 11.02.2014 00:50, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 3:41 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Is it okay to leave the HA issue for subsequent RCs
On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
+1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, KVM,
NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
There might be a problem with the HA
+1
On XenServer 6.2/Test Run: #1191 and ##1192
All the 5 failures are intermittent ssh related test script/env issues.
Link to Test report:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa-4.3/job/test-smoke-matrix
-4.3/1191/testReport/
H,
-1 (binding)
I have a backwards compatibility issue with 4.3. It might turn out to
be a setup thing but I have verified that 4.2.1 works with my setup.
I have four basic test cases|:
1. create network and vm on top - works
2. create bridged network and create vm on it - works
3. create a vpc
Daan
Can you create a tracking bug for this issue? Adding Kishan for his input
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 10:25 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
H,
-1
Adding Kelven to the thread
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 3:29 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 10:25 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
H,
-1 (binding)
I have a backwards compatibility issue with 4.3. It might turn out to be a
setup
+1(binding). Following the test procedure, and test it on devcloud, it works as
it is.
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 4:52 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0
+1 (binding) verified release artifacts, tested with devcloud, worked fine.
-Original Message-
From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 1:17 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
+1(binding
+1
Tested on devcloud with the release procedure, and worked fine.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 2/7/14 4:51 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
On 10.02.2014 21:17, Edison Su wrote:
+1(binding). Following the test procedure, and test it on devcloud,
it works as it is.
Is it okay to leave the HA issue for subsequent RCs?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 3:41 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
Is it okay to leave the HA issue for subsequent RCs?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Ok that's good start with a +1
Thanks
Animesh
On Feb 7, 2014, at 11:13 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
Built RPMs on CentOS 6.5, deployed advanced zone, vpc, network,
installed template, launched VM on local storage, launched VM on NFS
storage, launched VM on CLVM
On 08.02.2014 07:12, Marcus wrote:
+1 (binding)
Built RPMs on CentOS 6.5, deployed advanced zone, vpc, network,
installed template, launched VM on local storage, launched VM on NFS
storage, launched VM on CLVM storage.
Marcus, aren't you seeing the OVM issue with CLVM, too?
On 08.02.2014 10:00, Nux! wrote:
On 08.02.2014 07:12, Marcus wrote:
+1 (binding)
Built RPMs on CentOS 6.5, deployed advanced zone, vpc, network,
installed template, launched VM on local storage, launched VM on NFS
storage, launched VM on CLVM storage.
Marcus, aren't you seeing the OVM issue
On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
+1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, KVM,
NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
I plan to test out a bunch of storage use cases on Monday afternoon when I
have time, so I can chime in at that point.
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following
+1 (binding)
Built RPMs on CentOS 6.5, deployed advanced zone, vpc, network,
installed template, launched VM on local storage, launched VM on NFS
storage, launched VM on CLVM storage.
Built DEBs on Ubuntu 12.04, deployed advanced zone, vpc, network,
installed template, launched VM on local
35 matches
Mail list logo
