587 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
alex.hitch...@shapeblue.commailto:alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: 10 February 2014 01:05
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: UI Latency
I've been tinkering
On 13.02.2014 18:04, John Kinsella wrote:
Just posted
http://theresnomon.co/2014/improving-cloudstack-ui-performance/ - open
to any comments.
That's great, some people are already using Apache HTTPD for SSL
termination, this is a great bonus. Thanks for sharing.
Lucian
--
Sent from the
Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: 10 February 2014 01:05
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: UI Latency
I've been tinkering with httpd proxying the UI via mod_proxy_ajp, then
using mod_deflate to compress on the httpd side. That gets me about a 2.5x
decrease in loading
: Re: UI Latency
I've been tinkering with httpd proxying the UI via mod_proxy_ajp, then
using mod_deflate to compress on the httpd side. That gets me about a 2.5x
decrease in loading the login screen. system.js, which is the largest item
downloaded by default is around 980k, with gzip that drops
20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
alex.hitch...@shapeblue.commailto:alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: 10 February 2014 01:05
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: UI Latency
I've been tinkering with httpd
...@stratosec.co]
Sent: 10 February 2014 01:05
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: UI Latency
I've been tinkering with httpd proxying the UI via mod_proxy_ajp, then
using mod_deflate to compress on the httpd side. That gets me about a 2.5x
decrease in loading the login screen. system.js, which
969
alex.hitch...@shapeblue.commailto:alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: 10 February 2014 01:05
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: UI Latency
I've been tinkering with httpd proxying the UI via mod_proxy_ajp, then
using
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: UI Latency
I've been tinkering with httpd proxying the UI via mod_proxy_ajp, then using
mod_deflate to compress on the httpd side. That gets me about a 2.5x decrease
in loading the login screen. system.js, which is the largest item downloaded by
default is around 980k
I could be wrong, but I believe the idea of zipping the content for the UI
start page was discussed, but has not yet been implemented.
As far as I know (and have experienced), every time you go to the start
page, it does seem to take a while to load if you are not over a
particularly fast
3603 0540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: 09 February 2014 19:51
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: UI Latency
I could be wrong, but I believe the idea of zipping the content
alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: 09 February 2014 19:51
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: UI Latency
I could be wrong, but I believe the idea of zipping the content for the UI
start page
11 matches
Mail list logo