the scheme decide what kind of
broadcast domain( == isolation method???) we are planning to be in.
Regards,
-Original Message-
From: Hiroaki KAWAI [mailto:ka...@stratosphere.co.jp]
Sent: zaterdag 11 mei 2013 10:28
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: network guru refactor proposal
Ok, got it. My picture won't be as pretty but I will put some wording there.
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: woensdag 8 mei 2013 19:14
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: network guru refactor proposal
See for example
On 07/05/13 5:23 PM, Daan Hoogland dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
LS,
I want to refactor the network guru hierarchy to put som functionality in
abstract base classes. This will come down to extending the hierarchy for
guest networks to include all gurus. Are there any thoughts or gotchas to
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: network guru refactor proposal
On 07/05/13 5:23 PM, Daan Hoogland dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
LS,
I want to refactor the network guru hierarchy to put som functionality
in abstract base classes. This will come down to extending the
hierarchy for guest
will refrain if maintainability issues can be expected.
Regards,
-Original Message-
From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com]
Sent: dinsdag 7 mei 2013 15:17
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: network guru refactor proposal
On 07/05/13 5:23 PM, Daan Hoogland dhoogl
