Totally agree with Andrija.
-Wei
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 17:41, Andrija Panic wrote:
> Guys,
>
> My 2 cents:
>
> I've played with dynamically increasing CPU number and RAM memory size
> across all 3 hypervisors (during my analysis of how currently cpu/ram
> overprovisioning works, in order to se
I agree with Andrija.
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
__
Sven Vogel
Teamlead Platform
EWERK DIGITAL GmbH
Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
P +49 341 42649 - 99
F +49 341 42649 - 98
s.vo...@ewerk.com
www.ewerk.com
Geschäftsführer:
Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Frank Richter
Registergericht: Leipzig HRB
Guys,
My 2 cents:
I've played with dynamically increasing CPU number and RAM memory size
across all 3 hypervisors (during my analysis of how currently cpu/ram
overprovisioning works, in order to see the feasibility of dynamic
overprovisioning i.e. do any changes (reductions in cpu/ram) that we
al
> Just to add some context, this was awhile back that I tried it,
> years. The idea was that we could just set max memory to some crazy
> high number and then “unlock” just the amount in the offering, and
> adjust on the fly. As mentioned I found it was trivial for VM users
> to unlock the full amo
gt;
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>>
>> ____________
>> From: Andrija Panic
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 2:11:22 PM
>> To: dev
>> Subject: Re: Dynamic scaling support for KVM
>>
>> Correct Rohit - but we will not
t; From: Andrija Panic
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 2:11:22 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: Dynamic scaling support for KVM
>
> Correct Rohit - but we will not support scaling down the MEM (nor CPU),
> since OS will crash, since there is no working ballooning driver (you ne
> offerings or db/schema is necessary.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rohit Yadav
> >
> > Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> >
> > https://www.shapeblue.com
> >
> >
> > From: Wei ZHOU
> > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 20
I've created a work-in-progress PR for this:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3595
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
From: Andrija Panic
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 6:11 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Dynamic scaling support for KVM
Correct Rohit - b
; >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rohit Yadav
> >
> > Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> >
> > https://www.shapeblue.com
> >
> >
> > From: Wei ZHOU
> > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 16:37
> > To: dev@clou
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Rohit Yadav
>
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>
> https://www.shapeblue.com
>
>
> From: Wei ZHOU
> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 16:37
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Dynamic scal
t: Re: Dynamic scaling support for KVM
+1 in 4.14.
-Wei
Fariborz Navidan 于2019年8月8日周四 下午2:27写道：
> Hello Devs,
>
> Since long time ago libvirt supports live horizental scaling of VMs. Do you
> intend for ACS 4.13 to support dynamic scaling of KVM VMs?
>
> TIA
>
+1 in 4.14.
-Wei
Fariborz Navidan 于2019年8月8日周四 下午2:27写道：
> Hello Devs,
>
> Since long time ago libvirt supports live horizental scaling of VMs. Do you
> intend for ACS 4.13 to support dynamic scaling of KVM VMs?
>
> TIA
>
s open a github issue as a new feature request?
>
> From: Simon Weller
> Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 6:30 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Dynamic scaling support for KVM
>
> Hi Fariboz,
>
> We'd definitely like to
+1 to the feature.
@Fariborz, perhaps open a github issue as a new feature request?
From: Simon Weller
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 6:30 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic scaling support for KVM
Hi Fariboz,
We'd definitely like t
Hi Fariboz,
We'd definitely like to add that functionality, but it's going to be a fairly
big lift, as the libxml configs are currently built as a single block. A large
refactor of how we interact with libvirt will be required.
This is definitely something we have on our list and hopefully we ca
15 matches
Mail list logo
