---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/#review78995
---
Thank you for submitting your CloudStack contribution through
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/#review64041
---
Hari, your fix is already on 4.3; but not on 4.4, 4.5 or master.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/
---
(Updated Oct. 9, 2014, 9:27 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/#review34062
---
On high instance count cluster hosts (in clusters based on XS6.2) a
On Feb. 10, 2014, 8:41 a.m., Joris van Lieshout wrote:
On high instance count cluster hosts (in clusters based on XS6.2) a max of
16 would reduce the allowed instances on such a host. I would like to
suggest, in addition to the current proposition, make dynamic scaling
configurable
On Feb. 10, 2014, 8:41 a.m., Joris van Lieshout wrote:
On high instance count cluster hosts (in clusters based on XS6.2) a max of
16 would reduce the allowed instances on such a host. I would like to
suggest, in addition to the current proposition, make dynamic scaling
configurable
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/
---
(Updated Feb. 7, 2014, 11:19 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/#review33924
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kishan Kavala
On Feb. 7, 2014, 4:49 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/#review33928
---
Hey Daan,
I guess you are talking about your fix submitted in master [1].
You might want to see Hari's latest patch [2] as well. It solves the
following two things which I guess your fix misses.
1. It sets the vcpu max to a hardcoded value (say 16) only when dynamic
scaling is enabled. Do note
Can I have the patch applied in 4.3-forward?
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 11:33 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Harikrishna Patnala; Anthony Xu
Subject: Re: Review Request 17747: CLOUDSTACK-6023:Non windows
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 11:33 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Harikrishna Patnala; Anthony Xu
Subject: Re: Review Request 17747: CLOUDSTACK-6023:Non windows
instances are created on XenServer with a
On Feb. 7, 2014, 3:57 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/XenServerGuru.java, line 70
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/diff/2/?file=480018#file480018line70
Will the upgrade path get this config ??
Yes Nitin, after upgrade or fresh 4.3 setup
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/#review33959
---
Commit 95e41fdf0da50c165a9317847058fce4efeddbcf in branch
Animesh - done. Please cherry pick to 4.3
Daan - for pushing this to master I will have to revert your fix in master.
On 07/02/14 11:48 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
Can I have the patch applied in 4.3-forward?
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta
Here is the commit id on 4.3-forward
commit 95e41fdf0da50c165a9317847058fce4efeddbcf
-Harikrishna
From: Nitin Mehta
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 2:46 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Harikrishna Patnala; Anthony Xu
Subject: Re: Review Request
Done applied to 4.3
-Original Message-
From: Harikrishna Patnala
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 1:31 PM
To: Nitin Mehta; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Anthony Xu; Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject: RE: Review Request 17747: CLOUDSTACK-6023:Non windows
instances are created on XenServer
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/#review33967
---
Commit 01289b1647db2b08d42c883452aae6ca7dda in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/#review33778
---
Harikrishna, I would like to see the intermediate option of scale
On Feb. 6, 2014, 8:41 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
Harikrishna, I would like to see the intermediate option of scale up to
double the amount as well. Did you revert it? Is there a problem with this
approach?
Otherwise your submission is fine, of course.
Hi Daan,
I did not revert
we have hosts with 80 vms. 80*16 160 , which is spedcified in the
xenserver docs Joris came up with. That last part is not important to me
but I am still worried about the size of the statistics post by the members
to the pool-master. If we can make sure we don't cross this boundary I am
fine
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 6:33 AM
To: Harikrishna Patnala
Cc: Nitin Mehta; cloudstack
Subject: Re: Review Request 17747: CLOUDSTACK-6023:Non windows
instances are created on XenServer with a vcpu-max
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 6:33 AM
To: Harikrishna Patnala
Cc: Nitin Mehta; cloudstack
Subject: Re: Review Request 17747: CLOUDSTACK-6023:Non windows
instances are created on XenServer with a vcpu-max
Animesh,
I put in a patch that makes it double the number of assigned vcpu or
16 whichever is smaller. it is on 4.3-forward
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6023
25 matches
Mail list logo
