Hi,
Several of us in the community have found that with the 4.2 upgrade, when we
download and install the latest system VM template, CloudStack refuses to use
this template for new system VM creation. CloudStack appears to be usin a
cached or master-clone variant of the old template.
This
-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 11:25 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: System VM
>
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> Not arguing against it,
Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 11:25 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: System VM
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Not arguing against it, but I would be very much interested in your rea
From the perspective of a new community member being able to contribute to a
separate repo that doesn't touch the app code is nice because that would open
up the possibility of being a committer for the doc repo and separate that silo
of work. Also less volatile in the fact that people, like me,
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Not arguing against it, but I would be very much interested in your reasoning
> behind why having docs in a separate repo makes them easier to work on. What
> have we experienced since this time last year which has led
t: Re: System VM
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Travis Graham wrote:
> Hey Marcus,
>
> The docs were split out today to make them easier to work on. I'll be going
> through them later tonight to fix things like this and sending out a diff
> to get them corrected as soon as
Maurice,
Do you mean a clean install or an update?
In the latter case this would be the responsibility of the cloud operator.
In the first case, probably an oversight on the side of the community.
regards,
Daan
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote:
> Could I please inquire as
Could I please inquire as to why when installing CS4.2 that the template
it automatically installs is still CentOS 5.x, one would think this too
would have been updated.
Is there information why this is the case?
- M.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Travis Graham wrote:
> Hey Marcus,
>
> The docs were split out today to make them easier to work on. I'll be going
> through them later tonight to fix things like this and sending out a diff
> to get them corrected as soon as possible.
>
> Travis
Hi Travis:
Lets t
n't work. If the docs say that, we need to fix it.
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Maurice Lawler
> >
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Going through the install, I noticed the system VM template hasnt changed
> > URL. Is it safe to assume to utilize t
mplate-4.2-vh7.ova
>
>Travis
>
>On Oct 2, 2013, at 7:00 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Going through the install, I noticed the system VM template hasnt
>>changed URL. Is it safe to assume to utilize this one:
>>
>> #
>>/usr/li
For 4.2 that doesn't work. If the docs say that, we need to fix it.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Going through the install, I noticed the system VM template hasnt changed
> URL. Is it safe to assume to utilize this one:
>
> # /usr/lib
-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
VMware : http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova
Travis
On Oct 2, 2013, at 7:00 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote:
Hello,
Going through the install, I noticed the system VM template hasnt changed URL.
Is it safe to assume to utilize this one:
# /usr
/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova
Travis
On Oct 2, 2013, at 7:00 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Going through the install, I noticed the system VM template hasnt changed
> URL. Is it safe to assume to utilize this one:
>
> # /usr/lib64/cloud/common/scripts/stora
Hello,
Going through the install, I noticed the system VM template hasnt
changed URL. Is it safe to assume to utilize this one:
# /usr/lib64/cloud/common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt -m
/mnt/secondary -u
http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012
afaik not, you can define the new one with the documented name and you're
done.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Indra Pramana wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Would like to confirm on this:
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Indra Pramana wrote:
>
> > 2. Do I nee
Dear all,
Would like to confirm on this:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Indra Pramana wrote:
> 2. Do I need to delete the old system VM template from the template list,
> prior to the upgrade? If yes, I think this should be inside the
> documentation.
>
Prior to the upgrade f
That enabled running without a system vm. But you'd still need a VR if you
wanted network services.
On 9/26/13 12:47 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote:
>
>On Sep 26, 2013, at 3:27 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 09/26/2013 01:38 AM, Darren
than Ubuntu, hence the preference.
>>
>>> On 9/25/13 4:38 PM, "Darren Shepherd"
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there any technical reason why we couldn't use ubuntu LTS (12.04
>>> and soon to be 14.04) for the system VM. Additionally is
On Sep 26, 2013, at 3:27 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 09/26/2013 01:38 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
>> Is there any technical reason why we couldn't use ubuntu LTS (12.04
>> and soon to be 14.04) for the system VM. Additionally is there any
>> techni
On 09/26/2013 01:38 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
Is there any technical reason why we couldn't use ubuntu LTS (12.04
and soon to be 14.04) for the system VM. Additionally is there any
technical reason we couldn't switch to 64bit. I don't necesarily want
to get into "fi
lly performs better on Xen.
> Debian is just more stable than Ubuntu, hence the preference.
>
>> On 9/25/13 4:38 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote:
>>
>> Is there any technical reason why we couldn't use ubuntu LTS (12.04
>> and soon to be 14.04) for the sys
32-bit theoretically performs better on Xen.
Debian is just more stable than Ubuntu, hence the preference.
On 9/25/13 4:38 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote:
>Is there any technical reason why we couldn't use ubuntu LTS (12.04
>and soon to be 14.04) for the system VM. Addi
Is there any technical reason why we couldn't use ubuntu LTS (12.04
and soon to be 14.04) for the system VM. Additionally is there any
technical reason we couldn't switch to 64bit. I don't necesarily want
to get into "fight for you favorite distro" discussion, just curious.
Darren
s,
> Abhinav
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:32 PM
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Upgrade failed because system VM was created using old
> template?
>
> Hi Abhinav,
>
> We are using KVM.
>
> Thank you.
>
ameter.
Thanks and regards,
Abhinav
-Original Message-
From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:32 PM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upgrade failed because system VM was created using old template?
Hi Abhina
Hi Abhinav,
We are using KVM.
Thank you.
Hi Indra,
Which hypervisor are you using?
Thanks and regards,
Abhinav
-Original Message-
From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:18 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upgrade failed because system VM
> Abhinav
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 5:11 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Upgrade failed because system VM was created using old template?
>
> Dea
ade failed because system VM was created using old template?
Dear all,
I scrutinized the CloudStack management logs during my failed upgrade attempt
from CloudStack 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 and found this on the log:
===
2013-09-24 02:53:56,029 DEBUG [cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl]
(secstorage-1:null) Chec
;:"KVM"}},"executeInSequence":true,"wait":10800}}]
}
===
It seems that after the upgrade, the CloudStack management server tries to
create the system VMs using the old template rather than the new 4.2
template.
I did use the wrong filename when registering the template
(systemvm-kvm-4.2.0 instead of systemvm-kvm-4.2) due to wrong information
given by Abhinav but I have since corrected it prior to the upgrade, by
renaming the template name (rather than deleting the template and
re-register it).
My questions:
1. Do I need to get the template name right when I register the
systemvm-kvm-4.2 template from the beginning, prior to the upgrade?
2. Do I need to delete the old system VM template from the template list,
prior to the upgrade? If yes, I think this should be inside the
documentation.
Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
Cheers.
systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-maste
>>r-kvm.qcow2.bz2
>>
>>
>> VMware (generic)
>>http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova
>>
>> -Harikrishna
>> On 11-Sep-2013, at 10:04 AM, Yoshikazu Nojima
>>mailto:m...@ynojima.net>>
&
mvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
>
>
> VMware (generic)
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova
>
> -Harikrishna
> On 11-Sep-2013, at 10:04 AM, Yoshikazu Nojima
> mailto:m...@ynojima.net>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I&#
-Harikrishna
On 11-Sep-2013, at 10:04 AM, Yoshikazu Nojima
mailto:m...@ynojima.net>>
wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for latest system vm template file.
It seems jenkins job( build-systemvm-master ) does not generates an artifact.
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-
Hi,
I'm looking for latest system vm template file.
It seems jenkins job( build-systemvm-master ) does not generates an artifact.
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/
Do you know where can we download the latest latest system vm template file?
Thanks,
Yosh
It's no big deal for me to leave it as it is. :) It's just a CS setup
people are using at VMworld this week to demo the SolidFire plug-in.
Thanks, though!
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I was recollecting an occassion where this was what kept vms from
> being expunged.
I was recollecting an occassion where this was what kept vms from
being expunged. If there are no ips, probably something else is
keeping them tied to existence. My guess is some data relation, but as
I said 'my guess'. Good luck:|
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Just lo
Just looked...no IPs show up in the details for the "expunging" SSVM.
How do you recommend I get rid of it?
Thanks!
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Mike,
>
> make sure there is no ip associated with it
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Mike Tutkowski
> wrote:
> > I'
Mike,
make sure there is no ip associated with it
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> I'm not seeing any recognition from CS that this VM exists at all...no
> print outs in the console at least.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
>> Yes, there ar
I'm not seeing any recognition from CS that this VM exists at all...no
print outs in the console at least.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Yes, there are expunge global settings.
> On Aug 24, 2013 6:35 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
> wrote:
>
> > That would be great.
> >
> > Is
Yes, there are expunge global settings.
On Aug 24, 2013 6:35 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
wrote:
> That would be great.
>
> Is there a global setting for that, Marcus?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Marcus Sorensen >wrote:
>
> > It might be better to take a look and see why it fails t
That would be great.
Is there a global setting for that, Marcus?
Thanks
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> It might be better to take a look and see why it fails to expunge. In
> the past I've seen things like null pointers that have led to fixed
> bugs. You can turn dow
It might be better to take a look and see why it fails to expunge. In
the past I've seen things like null pointers that have led to fixed
bugs. You can turn down the expunge intervals to get it to try every
60 seconds or something, so you can watch what goes wrong.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:53 PM,
Hi,
I have a VM (SSVM) that's stuck in the Expunging State.
It's not interfering with anything that I'm aware of as I have another SSVM
up and running just fine, but I'd like to remove it from the database.
Does anyone know which table/tables I need to modify to make sure I get rid
of all of the
a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta.
>
>
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4068
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> scaling up user vm and system vm is failing with NPE if current service
> offeri
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
scaling up user vm and system vm is failing with NPE if current service
offering is deleted
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4068
Diffs
-
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java 5943cb4
server/test/com/cloud/vm
/heads/master
from Harikrishna Patnala
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=5404bf6 ]
CLOUDSTACK-4123: 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: On Adding VMWare Cluster to the
Setup, 3.0.6 System VM Template for VMWare is downloaded instead of 4.2
Updating the new system template URLs for
/heads/4.2 from
Harikrishna Patnala
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=48c8e64 ]
CLOUDSTACK-4123: 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: On Adding VMWare Cluster to the
Setup, 3.0.6 System VM Template for VMWare is downloaded instead of 4.2
Updating the new system template URLs for the
o ASF 4.2 Upgrade: On Adding VMWare Cluster to the
> Setup, 3.0.6 System VM Template for VMWare is downloaded instead of 4.2
>
> Updating the new system template URLs for the existing templates during
> upgrade to 4.2.
> If new 4.2 system template is regi
Kavala.
Changes
---
Updated patch after rebasing
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4123 and CLOUDSTACK-4205
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
CLOUDSTACK-4123: 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: On Adding VMWare Cluster to the
Setup, 3.0.6 System VM Template for VMWare is downloaded instead of 4.2
-4123 and CLOUDSTACK-4205
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> CLOUDSTACK-4123: 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: On Adding VMWare Cluster to the
> Setup, 3.0.6 System VM Template for VMWare is downloaded instead of 4.2
>
> Updating
apital) option. Is it possible you
have some local changes to these scripts copy_vhd*?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> > Sent: 09 August 2013 05:22
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Quick Q
Yes. Do not replace the original vhd-util.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Soheil Eizadi [mailto:seiz...@infoblox.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 10:30 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Quick Question about System VM problem
>
> I seem
e the old vhd-util, so I
thought this was by design meant to work this way.
-Soheil
From: Sanjay Tripathi [sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:36 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Quick Question about System VM probl
Kavala.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4123 and CLOUDSTACK-4205
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description (updated)
---
CLOUDSTACK-4123: 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: On Adding VMWare Cluster to the
Setup, 3.0.6 System VM Template for VMWare is downloaded instead of 4.2
Updating the new system
ent: 09 August 2013 07:36
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Quick Question about System VM problem
>
> I don't think you need two versions of vhd-util. If you are adding new
> XenServer host, just you need to copy the existing vhd-util from /usr/sbin to
> its cor
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4082
Not sure who to assign it to ... so I chose you :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: 09 August 2013 05:22
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Quick Question
host.
--Sanjay
> -Original Message-
> From: Soheil Eizadi [mailto:seiz...@infoblox.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 11:37 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Quick Question about System VM problem
>
> My experience was that you had to keep two version
08, 2013 9:22 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Quick Question about System VM problem
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:25:28PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote:
> There's a tag that is applied to you XenServer. AFAIK, the tag
> tells the management server not to download systemvm.i
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:25:28PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote:
> There's a tag that is applied to you XenServer. AFAIK, the tag
> tells the management server not to download systemvm.iso
>
> Also, be careful not to overwrite the vhd-utils on a XenServer
> version 6.x and beyond. The vhd-util me
sited there by the management server.
>
> --Alex
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2013 3:52 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Quick Questio
2 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Quick Question about System VM problem
>
> I see. Thanks for that info, Alex.
>
> So, the systemvm.iso and patches reside with the CS MS? They are not
> placed on secondary storage?
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4
t: Thursday, August 8, 2013 2:11 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Quick Question about System VM problem
> >
> > Thanks, guys
> >
> > I ended up starting over from scratch (wiped out my CS environment,
> > restored my XenServer
fire.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2013 2:11 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Quick Question about System VM problem
>
> Thanks, guys
>
> I ended up starting over from scratch (wiped out my CS environment,
> restored my XenServer hosts from snaps
3 22:11
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Quick Question about System VM problem
> >
> > Thanks, guys
> >
> > I ended up starting over from scratch (wiped out my CS environment,
> > restored my XenServer hosts from snapshots, etc.) and
sions of XenServer. It should be updated soon.
DL
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: 08 August 2013 22:11
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Quick Question about System VM problem
>
> Thanks, guys
>
easy here. :) I've set up this config
> many
> > > > times before and it's worked just fine (this is in 4.2):
> > > >
> > > > Two XenServer 6.1 hosts in a cluster.
> > > > Local storage is enabled in CS.
> > > > My secondary
e set up this config many
> > > times before and it's worked just fine (this is in 4.2):
> > >
> > > Two XenServer 6.1 hosts in a cluster.
> > > Local storage is enabled in CS.
> > > My secondary storage has the system template for XenServer.
> > >
erver.
> > Template routing-1 shows up under the local SR of one of my hosts along
> > with ROOT-, but the system VM flickers on, then disappears
> and
> > I see this exception in the console:
> >
> > WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
cluster.
> Local storage is enabled in CS.
> My secondary storage has the system template for XenServer.
> Template routing-1 shows up under the local SR of one of my hosts along
> with ROOT-, but the system VM flickers on, then disappears and
> I see this exception in the console:
s up under the local SR of one of my hosts along
with ROOT-, but the system VM flickers on, then disappears and
I see this exception in the console:
WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-500:) Catch Exception:
class com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeExcept
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
CLOUDSTACK-4123: 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: On Adding VMWare Cluster to the
Setup, 3.0.6 System VM Template for VMWare is downloaded instead of 4.2
Updating the new system template URLs for the existing templates during
upgrade to 4.2.
If
ug. 6, 2013, 9:14 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh.
>
>
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3723
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest O
/heads/master
from Sanjay Tripathi
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=0b00e13 ]
CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type
Information on the Database
Also added the debian 7 to debian 6 mapping in CitrixHelper file
to support the debian 7
/heads/4.2 from
Sanjay Tripathi
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=23aaeaf ]
CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type
Information on the Database
Also added the debian 7 to debian 6 mapping in CitrixHelper file
to support the debian 7
3723
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type
> Information on the Database.
>
> Made the correction in the DB entry to point to Debian 7.0 template instead
> of Deb
Prateek and Devdeep Singh.
Changes
---
Added the mapping in CitrixHelper file to support Debain 7 in older XS versions.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3723
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type
Information on the
: CLOUDSTACK-3723
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type
Information on the Database.
Made the correction in the DB entry to point to Debian 7.0 template instead of
Debain 6.0.
Diffs
-
setup/db/db/schema
re issues. So I made changes in source code, rebuild, did deploydb to
> clean DB.
> Now I am running ms again, but failed to bring up ssvm and cpvm, because of
> the existing old system vm from previous run.
>
> I know for VMware host, I need to clean the old entry thru vcent
hanges in source code, rebuild, did deploydb
> to clean DB.
> Now I am running ms again, but failed to bring up ssvm and cpvm, because
> of the existing old system vm from previous run.
>
> I know for VMware host, I need to clean the old entry thru vcenter. But
> not familiar with x
Hi,
I started running MS , host is xen hypervisor. After 2 system vms are up, there
were issues. So I made changes in source code, rebuild, did deploydb to clean
DB.
Now I am running ms again, but failed to bring up ssvm and cpvm, because of the
existing old system vm from previous run.
I
/heads/master
from Harikrishna Patnala
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=f12adff ]
CLOUDSTACK-3042: handle System VM Scaling up of memory/CPU based on the
presence of tools in the template
Signed off by : Nitin Mehta
- ASF Subversion and Git Services
On Aug. 1, 2013, 6
d482302a9be561f6bd
error: could not apply 3813189... CLOUDSTACK-3042: handle System VM Scaling up
of memory/CPU based on the presence of tools in the template
hint: after resolving the conflicts, mark the corrected paths
- Nitin
---
This is a
/heads/4.2 from
Harikrishna Patnala
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=3813189 ]
CLOUDSTACK-3042: handle System VM Scaling up of memory/CPU based on the
presence of tools in the template
Signed off by : Nitin Mehta
- ASF Subversion and Git Services
On Aug. 1, 2013, 6:35
STACK-3042
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> CLOUDSTACK-3042: handle System VM Scaling up of memory/CPU based on the
> presence of tools in the template
>
>
> Diffs
> -
>
> server/src/com/clo
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
CLOUDSTACK-3042: handle System VM Scaling up of memory/CPU based on the
presence of tools in the template
Diffs
-
server/src/com/cloud/consoleproxy/ConsoleProxyManagerImpl.java 5983aa7
server/src/com/cloud/network/router
Any changes to system VM templates require considerable testing. Pl do not make
changes at this time for System VM templates unless there is a defect fix
needed.
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:35 AM
To: dev
Hi All,
For 4.2 we had started using new system vm template.
And the generated system vm template for each target hypervisor don't have
hypervisor specific guest tools installed in it.
It has open-vm tools not hypervisor specific.
I think it would be good to have xentools installed in Xens
/heads/master
from Harikrishna Patnala
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=2f36997 ]
CLOUDSTACK-3779: Support System vm scaling on VMWare
Marked the system template new system template as dynamicallyScalable
- handled upgrade case
- moved "dynamicallyScalable&quo
/heads/4.2 from
Harikrishna Patnala
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=4d35d92 ]
CLOUDSTACK-3779: Support System vm scaling on VMWare
Marked the system template new system template as dynamicallyScalable
- handled upgrade case
- moved "dynamicallyScalable&quo
ly 26, 2013, 8:41 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta.
>
>
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3637 and CLOUDSTACK-3779
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> CLOUDSTACK-3779: Support System vm scaling on VMWare
>
&g
;
> (Updated July 26, 2013, 8:41 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta.
>
>
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3637 and CLOUDSTACK-3779
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> CLOUDSTACK-3779: Support Syst
/heads/4.2 from
Sanjay Tripathi
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=2820a78 ]
CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type
Information on the Database.
This commit also contains the guestOS addition of new CentOS releases
supported by XenServer
/heads/master
from Sanjay Tripathi
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=d636887 ]
CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type
Information on the Database.
This commit also contains the guestOS addition of new CentOS releases
supported by XenServer
ly 26, 2013, 9:34 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh.
>
>
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3723
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has
Prateek and Devdeep Singh.
Changes
---
Updated the patch as per review comments.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3723
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type
Information on the Database.
This commit also
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/12937/diff/2/?file=327896#file327896line3749>
> >
> > Will this block KVM upgrade when the system vms are stopped
This is a specific check for xenserver and running system vm. For KVM or other
hype
Mehta.
Changes
---
Changed the log message
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3637 and CLOUDSTACK-3779
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
CLOUDSTACK-3779: Support System vm scaling on VMWare
Marked the system template new system template as dynamicallyScalable
- handled upgrade case
; Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type
> Information on the Database.
>
> This commit also contains the guestOS addition of new CentOS releases
> supporte
79
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> CLOUDSTACK-3779: Support System vm scaling on VMWare
>
> Marked the system template new system template as dynamicallyScalable
>- handled upgrade case
>- moved "dynamicallyScalable"
401 - 500 of 558 matches
Mail list logo
