: Antonio Fornié Casarrubios
Subject: Re: seeing Unknown parameters : ctxdetails for
addResourceDetail/removeResourceDetail
I am alright with the ability to turn it off, preferably at run time.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
Hey Daan,
In the thread we
[nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 2:42 AM
To: Antonio Fornié Casarrubios; cloudstack
Subject: Re: seeing Unknown parameters : ctxdetails for
addResourceDetail/removeResourceDetail
Thanks Anotnio. That’s what I have been saying from the beginning.
IMHO,
I don’t see much value
: Re: seeing Unknown parameters : ctxdetails for
addResourceDetail/removeResourceDetail
Thanks Anotnio. That’s what I have been saying from the beginning. IMHO, I
don’t see much value in having this, but I am really concerned with the
performance of the apis especially in production setups
From: Nitin Mehta [nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 2:42 AM
To: Antonio Fornié Casarrubios; cloudstack
Subject: Re: seeing Unknown parameters : ctxdetails for
addResourceDetail/removeResourceDetail
Thanks Anotnio. That’s what I have been saying from the beginning
...@citrix.com
Subject: Re: seeing Unknown parameters : ctxdetails for
addResourceDetail/removeResourceDetail
If the parameter is correct then it should not be in the logs as unknown.
And so it should be added to the worker in the list of parameters that
the worker will never blame. That is the fix. Right
...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 2:42 AM
To: Antonio Fornié Casarrubios; cloudstack
Subject: Re: seeing Unknown parameters : ctxdetails for
addResourceDetail/removeResourceDetail
Thanks Anotnio. That’s what I have been saying from the beginning. IMHO,
I don’t see much value in having this, but I am
...@citrix.com
Subject: Re: seeing Unknown parameters : ctxdetails for
addResourceDetail/removeResourceDetail
If the parameter is correct then it should not be in the logs as unknown. And
so it should be added to the worker in the list of parameters that the worker
will never blame. That is the fix
If the parameter is correct then it should not be in the logs as unknown.
And so it should be added to the worker in the list of parameters that the
worker will never blame. That is the fix. Right?
Perhaps it is not considered good that everytime a new parameter is added
to the api requests it
The errors in the requests are created by these well known clients, that's
why they should be fixed. It's not that the admin misspelled a param, it's
more that the code that creates the requests (the js in the web ui,
cloudmonkey, Marvin or any other...)
Cheers
antonio
2014-05-14 3:05 GMT+02:00
I am seeing the same for many commands. So this is not specific to
add/removeResourceDetail
2014-05-09 18:17:39,477 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
(API-Job-Executor-24:job-28 ctx-6eaab5d7) Received unknown parameters for
command updateNetworkServiceProvider. Unknown parameters :
Same here. I see it nearly all API calls I make. I use port 8096 though,
if that makes any difference.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 5/13/14 3:01 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
I am seeing the same for many commands. So this is not specific to
add/removeResourceDetail
2014-05-09 18:17:39,477
It is usefull for users that misspell a parameter and expect behavior
related to it. not just in development.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
I introduced the parameter ctxdetails which carries all the context
details (currently all the first class
My calls were also executed via 8096 port. We have to eliminate this noise
in the logs before shipping 4.4
On 5/13/14, 10:16 AM, Amogh Vasekar amogh.vase...@citrix.com wrote:
Same here. I see it nearly all API calls I make. I use port 8096 though,
if that makes any difference.
Thanks,
Amogh
On
Hi all,
See this when trying to deploy devcloud.cfg with marvin aswell. Eventually
it fails.
On 13 May 2014 11:01, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
I am seeing the same for many commands. So this is not specific to
add/removeResourceDetail
2014-05-09 18:17:39,477 WARN
I introduced the parameter ctxdetails which carries all the context
details (currently all the first class entities and their corresponding
interface mapping).
This would be done for each of the api and hence seen for all apis.
I saw the code in ParamGenericValidationWorker and will fix this.
Daan - MS logs are visible only to the admin and not a general user. So
are you saying this is for admin to debug in case he misspelled a param ?
I feel that this shouldn’t be ON by default and whether such logic should
be part of CS core ?
I also find it difficult to understand that in
Hi all and sorry for the delay in the reply. Let me try to answer to
different subjects mentioned here.
What is this functionality? It's just a server side check for the format of
the requests, specifically for the received parameters. That's not
something strange, there are many communication
Hi Antonio,
I see following errors in the 4.4 logs:
WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker] (API-Job-Executor-49:job-2867
ctx-072e9ae9) Received unknown parameters for command removeResourceDetail.
Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
18 matches
Mail list logo
