So, what’s the conclusion of this thread? We should not install install
xenserver tools at all?
> On 21-Nov-2014, at 4:59 pm, Stephen Turner wrote:
>
> I didn't even realise we still support XS 5.6. I would advocate not
> supporting that any more, independent of this tools di
pervisor vendor supports?
--
Stephen Turner
From: Tim Mackey
Date: 21 November 2014 09:38:21 CET
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Should we install XenServer tools in systemvmtemplates
The big problem I recall with the 5.6 Linux tools happe
the question of XCP and the tools since XenServer tools
were never designed to work with XCP. They probably do work just fine, but
if there was an issue we'd be challenged to get it sorted.
If the option of automatically having the tools installed isn't viable, the
next things I'd
enServer works with older tools, not the
> other way.
> On Nov 20, 2014 4:57 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>
>> If XenServer tools are backward compatible then we can perhaps install the
>> latest xs-tools (6.2)? Will that cause issue if the underlying
>> Xen/XenServer h
It's the other way around. Newer XenServer works with older tools, not the
other way.
On Nov 20, 2014 4:57 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
> If XenServer tools are backward compatible then we can perhaps install the
> latest xs-tools (6.2)? Will that cause issue if the under
If XenServer tools are backward compatible then we can perhaps install the
latest xs-tools (6.2)? Will that cause issue if the underlying Xen/XenServer
hypervisor version is not 6.2?
> On 20-Nov-2014, at 9:12 pm, Tim Mackey wrote:
>
> From the XenServer perspective, we have a smal
l the appropriate xentools.
FG
On 2014-11-20 4:19 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi,
During the CCCEU conference, I’ve been in some discussions with few people on
whether we should install/bundle xenserver tools (and vmware tools and/or
virtio-modules).
I think we can easily do this, but let’s discus
>From the XenServer perspective, we have a small problem. The XenServer
tools are backward compatible, but not guaranteed forward compatible. What
that means is we'd need to include the XenServer 5.6 tools, and those have
a commercial license. The XenServer 5.6 tools also have a few bu
Hi,
During the CCCEU conference, I’ve been in some discussions with few people on
whether we should install/bundle xenserver tools (and vmware tools and/or
virtio-modules).
I think we can easily do this, but let’s discuss the following;
- Which version of xs-tools etc. we should install? For
The GPL binaries should be provisioned in the template (using
tools/appliance/ scripts) and should not be part of the systemvm.iso.
The scripts in the iso can be modified as per the provisioned binaries.
Xenserver tools can be made available for all and will facilitate features
like dynamic
meaning that we cannot solve this as proposed bu Joris. What should we
do about making sure hte xenserver tools are on the system vms. should
they go in the template or in the systemvm.iso? The question is kind
of rethorical, the real question is; Are they a standard requirement
that we want
For including xstools in systemvm we will be modifying the scripts.
The gpl¹d binaries are not part of the distribution. That keeps us in
clear as far as licensing is concerned.
-abhi
On 19/09/13 6:41 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>
>yes, if someone can tell me if we can include gpl'd binaries in
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
> Do file a big to track.
does not compute&%$&^$@
Oh wait, you have a spellchecker active ;)
yes, if someone can tell me if we can include gpl'd binaries in our
git/distro I think we should. In that case I will file a bug.
regards,
gt;>>>/usr/share/doc/xe-guest-utilities/COPYING.gz
>>>>/usr/sbin
>>>>/usr/sbin/xe-update-guest-attrs
>>>>/usr/sbin/xe-linux-distribution
>>>>/usr/sbin/xe-daemon
>>>>/etc
>>>>/etc/udev
>>>>/etc/udev/rules.d
&
>>/usr/sbin/xe-linux-distribution
>>>/usr/sbin/xe-daemon
>>>/etc
>>>/etc/udev
>>>/etc/udev/rules.d
>>>/etc/udev/rules.d/z10_xen-vcpu-hotplug.rules
>>>/etc/init.d
>>>/etc/init.d/xe-linux-distribution
>>>root@r-8691-VM:~# l
d
>>/etc/udev/rules.d/z10_xen-vcpu-hotplug.rules
>>/etc/init.d
>>/etc/init.d/xe-linux-distribution
>>root@r-8691-VM:~# ls xe-guest-utilities_6.0.2-766_i386.deb
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
>> wrote:
>&
gt;> Daan,
>> Do you know what all packages we need to add to get the tools
>>working. I
>> see that current scripts are installing xenstore-utils.
>>
>>
>> On 17/09/13 1:58 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>>
>>>H,
>>>
>>>In the present template for systemvms on xen the xenserver tools are
>>>not installed due to distribution rights issues. Now that xenserver is
>>>open-sourced, can anyone say if they can be added again?
>>>
>>>regards,
>>>Daan
>>
s working. I
> see that current scripts are installing xenstore-utils.
>
>
> On 17/09/13 1:58 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>
>>H,
>>
>>In the present template for systemvms on xen the xenserver tools are
>>not installed due to distribution rights issues.
Daan,
Do you know what all packages we need to add to get the tools working. I
see that current scripts are installing xenstore-utils.
On 17/09/13 1:58 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>H,
>
>In the present template for systemvms on xen the xenserver tools are
>not install
H,
In the present template for systemvms on xen the xenserver tools are
not installed due to distribution rights issues. Now that xenserver is
open-sourced, can anyone say if they can be added again?
regards,
Daan
20 matches
Mail list logo
