Re: [DISCUSS] Major business logic refactoring: Move from Account to UserAccount

Only one table will be affected. > On 16-Nov-2014, at 3:14 am, Amogh Vasekar wrote: > > Question - What happens to the already existing VMs with entries in the > DB? Do we keep it NULL? NULL will be and not useful. I think it should be okay to have a db migration path that sets user_id to the f

[TEST] DevCloud4 - rework / Cleanup

TL;DR: Devcloud 4 cleaned up a bit, chef attributes no longer hidden, further user customisation allowed, Testers wanted. ** advanced zone on 4.4.* isn't supported due to a change on some API param for setting tags on interfaces ** Hi All, https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/tree/dev/binary-i

[QUESTION] How come we don't include Users@ in vote threads?

Hi All, Just out of interest, is there some reason we don't include the users mailing list within vote threads for feedback around product stability? >From what I've seen a lot of them have test labs. It would be nice to get their feedback before releasing rather than after... Thanks, Ian

Re: [QUESTION] How come we don't include Users@ in vote threads?

+1 -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Ian Duffy" > To: "CloudStack Dev" > Sent: Sunday, 16 November, 2014 16:20:55 > Subject: [QUESTION] How come we don't include Users@ in vote threads? > Hi All, > > Just out of inter

Re: [QUESTION] How come we don't include Users@ in vote threads?

> On 16-Nov-2014, at 9:50 pm, Ian Duffy wrote: > > > Just out of interest, is there some reason we don't include the users > mailing list within vote threads for feedback around product stability? > > From what I've seen a lot of them have test labs. It would be nice to get > their feedback befor

Re: [QUESTION] How come we don't include Users@ in vote threads?

I'm not sure about adding users@ into the vote since it's more dev@ related. But, I agree it would be nice to notify users@ that we have an RC it would potentially involved more people in the test phases. On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > > On 16-Nov-2014, at 9:50 pm, Ian

Re: [QUESTION] How come we don't include Users@ in vote threads?

> I think the general problem here is that for each voting candidate adding users@ML would be only useful if we also build a deb/rpm repo for them to test the voting candidate so everyone won’t have to build their own CloudStack. My suggestion is to do that, and I think we can have the testing rep

Re: [TEST] DevCloud4 - rework / Cleanup

Hi Ian, I'm trying it as it seams quite strait forward. although, the instruction to install cloudstack [1]: I should run that in the management VM right, not locally ? does IPs are hardcoded somewhere? Thanks, that's awesome to have a local cloudstack running without effort. I'm testing this on

Re: [TEST] DevCloud4 - rework / Cleanup

Hi Pierre, So advanced and basic are running from code on the host machine. Only a NFS, MySQL and hypervisor box is supplied. Testing is for binary-installation-advanced and binary-installation-basic. On 16 November 2014 19:44, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > Hi Ian, > I'm trying it as it seams quit

Re: [QUESTION] How come we don't include Users@ in vote threads?

Den søndag 16. november 2014 skrev Pierre-Luc Dion følgende: > I'm not sure about adding users@ into the vote since it's more dev@ > related. But, I agree it would be nice to notify users@ that we have an RC > it would potentially involved more people in the test phases. > > I must disagree. Crea

Re: [QUESTION] How come we don't include Users@ in vote threads?

I agree that more tests are welcome, we have to try then :) > Afaik non-pmc's aren't binding and any votes would merely be an indication, > or do i misunderstand? All votes are important [1] and count as indicator, who ever vote mean something, It also show that the community members did some te

Re: did anyone try 4.4.2?

I'm trying to build 4.4.2 from 4.4 branch. I'm having the db deployment error that schema-441to442.sql does not exist. Could it be the cause of the problem you are seeing too ? On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I run into a strange exception during the spring load phase. Di

Review Request 28114: RabbitMQ integration, make SSL protocol configurable rather than hard coded

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28114/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7923 http

Re: [QUESTION] How come we don't include Users@ in vote threads?

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > I agree that more tests are welcome, we have to try then :) > > On the other side, how many devs can say that they really like to do thorough release testing? My guess is that it's a rather small number. By adding users, and if testing ac

Re: [QUESTION] How come we don't include Users@ in vote threads?

My suggestions and comments; - Build a rpm/deb repository before you start voting (we can use packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing) - Tag each Voting Candidate (using a -vc or -rc suffix followed by the round number, for example 4.4.2-rc-01) and we build rpm/deb repo using tags. - This re