Yes, you can create Advance Zone without having any actual public IP range. You
can use your exiting LAN range and setup CloudStack. Then obviously you can
only access from that network only. ( I hope this is for testing purpose or
in-house deployment )
Vivek Kumar
Sr. Manager - Cloud & DevOps
Hi all,
As September arrived, we are in now all back to work. The CloudStack
Collaboration Conference organisation is going as planned and I am happy to
announce we have first sponsors of the event. Two reminders from me:
- May I ask you all to register for the event here:
https://events.hubilo
It's always good to move to the updated libraries, and I agree on upgrading to
lang3 library (from lang).
We can continue use/improve our facade 'com.cloud.utils.StringUtils' for
readability, custom utils from third party libs, this will be a single point of
update whenever any util library is
+1 (binding)
With help from my colleagues Bobby and Vladi, I performed the following tests:
* Fresh installation + smoketests (RC1 & RC2):
* CentOS7 ms + CentOS 7 kvm - all pass
* CentOS7 ms + XCP-ng 8.2 - all pass
* Ubuntu 18.04 ms + Ubuntu 20.04 kvm - all pass except f
Thanks Alex, Wei. I've updated the docs here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+Support+in+Isolated+Network+and+VPC+with+Static+Routing
I'll leave the thread open for futher discussion/ideas/feedback. I think we've
completed the phase1 design doc including all feedback
Hey All,
So, I’ve moved over to the Dark Side, and I’m now purely a user of CloudStack
with Ticketmaster/Live Nation. I’m mostly going to be all about breaking
things rather than fixing them 😊
…Starting off with: As root admin I can list all VMs including ones in
projects via cmk -list v
That doesn't seem like a big change from what you've already been doing :D
There's a PR for it https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4828
From: Paul Angus
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 4:50 PM
To: [email protected] ;
[email protected]
Su
Hi David,
Harsh - But probably true
Thanks for the link!
Kind regards
Paul Angus
-Original Message-
From: David Jumani
Sent: 13 September 2021 12:46
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Hi (Again)
That doesn't seem like a big change from what you've already been doing :D
Ther
pdion891 commented on pull request #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/7#issuecomment-918125968
Hi @psycofdj, we will create a new release this week !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
psycofdj commented on pull request #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/7#issuecomment-918126448
Thanks a lot
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific commen
Hi All, @Hoang,
I have a short question. In the old CloudStack UI were a separation between
regions and zones. But I don't find it in the new UI. Is this change intended?
Kind regards
Jonas Porsche
__
Jonas Porsche
BA-Student der Informatik
EWERK DIGITAL GmbH
Br?hl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
P
F +49
Hi Paul,
There's another PR inflight aiming towards achieving something similar:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/5207.
Regards,
Pearl
From: Paul Angus
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 5:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Hi (Again)
Hi D
Paul,
Until the proper feature/changes are in, to pass any arbitrary param/values to
an API you can simply add them in the UI/URL.
For example, as root admin:
http://qa.cloudstack.cloud:8080/client/#/vm returns 11 VMs
http://qa.cloudstack.cloud:8080/client/#/vm?projectid=-1&listall=true returns
rhtyd commented on pull request #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/7#issuecomment-918151370
Thanks for volunteering @pdion891 - I suppose we'll also need to check/make
a list of known users so we don't accidentally break them. The two I know are:
https://github.com/apach
@Gabriel Beims Bräscher , I would agree that just
standardising could work as well, but only if we sanction just a single
implementation. This has proven to be hard in the past. I say, let's do
both;
- Let's make a facade. If names are good, do a transparent passthrough, if
not the best let's use o
psycofdj commented on pull request #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/7#issuecomment-918167857
I was watting the release to bump it in
https://github.com/orange-cloudfoundry/terraform-provider-cloudstack. I see
that @rhtyd has already talked with my colleague @ArthurHlt
psycofdj edited a comment on pull request #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/7#issuecomment-918167857
I was waiting the release to bump it in
https://github.com/orange-cloudfoundry/terraform-provider-cloudstack. I see
that @rhtyd has already talked with my colleague @Art
pdion891 commented on pull request #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/7#issuecomment-918180372
Release v4.15.1 build and available.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
Welcome back, Paul :)
On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 14:40, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Until the proper feature/changes are in, to pass any arbitrary
> param/values to an API you can simply add them in the UI/URL.
>
> For example, as root admin:
> http://qa.cloudstack.cloud:8080/client/#/vm returns
psycofdj commented on pull request #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/7#issuecomment-918225329
Thanks @pdion891 for the release
Unless I'm mistaken, the release tag should be `v2..` as long as the
library declares itself as `module github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/v
pdion891 commented on pull request #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/7#issuecomment-918254644
oh, so you think creating release version that match cloudstack version such
as the one I did this morning is bad from a go lib perspective? we had a
discussion in dev@cloudsta
psycofdj commented on pull request #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/7#issuecomment-918260351
yes, that's how gomodules works from my experience and from what I
understand of the linked documentation.
With the current tag, I have to use pseudo-versioning, like thi
Thanks all for the replies.
To summarize what we discussed till now:
- Devs are inclined to use facade, as it may ease the upgrade and
maintenance process of 3rd party libs.
- We should standardize the libs we're using. "commons.lang3" is a solid
candidate, as it provides all we need, has more
pdion891 commented on pull request #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/7#issuecomment-918268464
release 4.15.1.0 deleted and a new one created
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/releases/tag/v2.10.0
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
T
Thanks for raising the bylaws, Paul.
You are absolutely right regarding point 2 being covered by 3.4.3 bylaws.
That's the idea indeed; keep the "extra" release aligned with the current
release plan.
Therefore, we would still hold the flexibility for having more releases if
that fits the community'
psycofdj commented on pull request #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/7#issuecomment-918272979
like a charm, thank you !
```
go get github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/[email protected]
go: downloading github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/v2 v2.10.0
go get: upgraded github
pdion891 commented on pull request #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/7#issuecomment-918280122
nice, good to know !
thanks !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
Hi All,
We had a discussion about standardizing the string libs we're using
(https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r806cd10b3de645c150e5e0e3d845c5a380a700197143f57f0834d758%40%3Cdev.cloudstack.apache.org%3E).
As I proposed, I'm opening this voting thread to see if all are in favor of
using "comm
+1
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:02 PM Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We had a discussion about standardizing the string libs we're using (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r806cd10b3de645c150e5e0e3d845c5a380a700197143f57f0834d758%40%3Cdev.cloud
+1
Good idea.
On 13/09/2021 12:02, Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador wrote:
Hi All,
We had a discussion about standardizing the string libs we're using
(https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r806cd10b3de645c150e5e0e3d845c5a380a700197143f57f0834d758%40%3Cdev.cloudstack.apache.org%3E).
As I prop
+1
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021, 12:40 Sadi wrote:
> +1
>
> Good idea.
>
> On 13/09/2021 12:02, Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We had a discussion about standardizing the string libs we're using (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r806cd10b3de645c150e5e0e3d845c5a380a700
Thanks - it was good to find role with a chunk of CloudStack in it.
Kind regards
Paul Angus
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic
Sent: 13 September 2021 14:39
To: dev
Subject: Re: Hi (Again)
Welcome back, Paul :)
On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 14:40, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Un
Hi All,
We are looking forward to cutting RC1 soon. Kindly share or ping me this week
if there are any issues or pull requests that we should include in 4.16.0.0.
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
manunolo opened a new issue #4:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/4
I have a problem when I want to build a virtual machine with a custom offer,
I cannot set the custom values I need for Cpu, Ram and CPUSpeed.
```
Terraform will perform the follo
manunolo closed issue #4:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/4
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: de
+1. Sounds like a good plan.
From: Gabriel Br?scher
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 9:15 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Standard string lib
+1
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021, 12:40 Sadi wrote:
> +1
>
> Good idea.
>
> On 13/09/2021 12:02, Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvado
36 matches
Mail list logo
