hi,
Welcome home Bernhard, nice to see you back here.
yup, i was a bit busy at work
BTW, is there a way to just run individual tests, or does 'build test'
need to just run them all.
well, if you want to edit tool/targets/test-build.xml,
adopting the
target junit-tests, and
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
-this.reset();
-this.init();
+reset();
+init();
Why do you make these changes? A long time ago, we decided that
this.method()
is more readable and we want to use that :)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25433.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25433.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25433.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25433.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Weitergeleitete Nachricht / Forwarded Message ---
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:22:44 +0100 (MET)
From: Stephanie Zohner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug in session-fw logicsheet (?)
Hi,
I came accross the following problem recently, and I would like to know if
this is a bug
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
I noticed that all development version of libraries are now named
-dev.jar with no indication of the date as we had some time ago.
Although it is certainly convenient for the updater since it avoids
deleting/adding a jar and modifying jars.xml, it's absolutely not
convenient for users
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25447.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that all development version of libraries are now named
-dev.jar with no indication of the date as we had some time ago.
Although it is certainly convenient for the updater since it avoids
deleting/adding a jar and modifying jars.xml, it's absolutely
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25422.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25429.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25422.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
David Crossley wrote:
As we discussed in the other Whitepace thread [1] there are
many issues with this, so we need to tread carefully. Imagine
that someone was doing major work on a certain component. When
they do a 'cvs update' then they would get massive cvs conflicts.
[1]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sylvain 2003/12/11 10:19:05
Modified:lib jars.xml
Removed: lib/core excalibur-component-20031126.jar
excalibur-store-1.0-dev.jar
-libcore/excalibur-component-20031126.jar/lib
+libcore/excalibur-component-20031211
/excalibur-component-20031211.jar/lib
Sylvain, would you mind also adding the new jar ;-) ?
Ooops, done :-/
That's what happens when you want to commit too quickly before leaving
work to go home after a tiring day...
Sorry,
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware
Hi all,
I fixed the store according to the recent discussion:
- the transient-store is really transient, and its default
implementation forbid to set user-persistent-store to true.
- the store is a memory store backed by the persistent-store
All stores are now instrumented and provide 3
Hi team,
As per the discussion following the new cocoon.setupObject(obj) method,
I added to new methods to the FOM:
- cocoon.createObject(class) creates an object and goes through the
various Avalon lifecycle interfaces.
The class attribute can be either a Class (written
One more new feature ;-)
Following the thread extending FOM about extending processPipelineTo
to SAX and DOM, I wrote a utility class that handles all this.
This class is totally decorrelated from the FOM and the cocoon object
and provides the processToDOM(), processToSAX() and
Last one for today ;-)
I moved the ParanoidCocoonServlet and associated classes to a new
paranoid block?
Why this? Because ParanoidCocoonServlet is actually a generic servlet
wrapper that can shield _any_ servlet in a ParanoidClassLoader. Moving
it to its own block leads to having a
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
One more new feature ;-)
Following the thread extending FOM about extending
processPipelineTo
to SAX and DOM, I wrote a utility class that handles all this.
This class is totally decorrelated from the FOM and the
cocoon object
and provides the
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
One more new feature ;-)
Following the thread extending FOM about extending processPipelineTo
to SAX and DOM, I wrote a utility class that handles all this.
This class is totally decorrelated from the FOM and the cocoon object
and provides the processToDOM(),
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Hi team,
As per the discussion following the new cocoon.setupObject(obj) method,
I added to new methods to the FOM:
- cocoon.createObject(class) creates an object and goes through the
various Avalon lifecycle interfaces.
The class attribute can be either a Class
Tony Collen wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
One more new feature ;-)
Following the thread extending FOM about extending
processPipelineTo to SAX and DOM, I wrote a utility class that
handles all this.
This class is totally decorrelated from the FOM and the cocoon
object and provides the
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip/
Was there a discussion about this that I missed, and if not,
what do you think of using -dev-mmdd.jar names?
-1 to -dev, +1 to whatever-yyymmdd, whatever may include
dev for those who want it.
I agree entirely. In fact this has
Unico Hommes wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
One more new feature ;-)
Following the thread extending FOM about extending processPipelineTo to SAX and DOM, I wrote a utility class that handles all this.
snip/
Damn dude, you just keep 'em coming ;-) Excellent! This is going to be s
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Tony Collen wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip
So what about deprecating cocoon.processPipelineTo from the
official FOM and direct users to the new class ?
I'm +0 on this. I'm not sure where someone would specifically want an
OutputStream rather than a DOM document,
Thanks for the explanation. I am a little bit disappointed by the number of
test cases, but I guess that means there is a lot of work to be done! I will
probably end up writing some for my project and contribute them.
What is the upcoming caching work, if I may ask.
- Jeff
Quoting David
Please do not Cc messages to people. Sending to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will suffice.
daltonj wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. I am a little bit disappointed by the
number of test cases, but I guess that means there is a lot of work
to be done!
That is correct. This is essentially a volunteer
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25403.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 11 Dec 2003, at 13:53, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Last one for today ;-)
I moved the ParanoidCocoonServlet and associated classes to a new
paranoid block?
Why this? Because ParanoidCocoonServlet is actually a generic servlet
wrapper that can shield _any_ servlet in a ParanoidClassLoader. Moving
On 11 Dec 2003, at 14:16, David Crossley wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip/
Was there a discussion about this that I missed, and if not,
what do you think of using -dev-mmdd.jar names?
-1 to -dev, +1 to whatever-yyymmdd, whatever may include
dev for those who want it.
I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25433.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25381.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
40 matches
Mail list logo
