Simon Mieth wrote:
Hi again,
i forgot, the CocoonBean setup like ContextDir is the same
and a changes are ignored, this needs a new cocoon-instance.
So the recycle only works with the initialized Context.
Maybe there is a better name as recycle to protect
confusion about the interface from
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 11 Dec 2003, at 13:53, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Last one for today ;-)
I moved the ParanoidCocoonServlet and associated classes to a new
paranoid block?
Why this? Because ParanoidCocoonServlet is actually a generic
servlet wrapper that can
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 11:47, Upayavira wrote:
I need a row submit action, that allows a form to be submitted for a
specific line in a repeater.
An example usecase would be on a selling site, you have a repeater
showing purchasable items, each with a 'buy' button next to
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 08:05:52 +
Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thinking about this, it occurs to me that what your
'recycle' method does is to remove all targets, rather
than recycle the component.
Therefore, I'd suggest we have a method called something
like removeTargets() that
Geoff Howard wrote:
Don't know :) I guess it's because we don't check if the conf
directory
exists before we apply the xconfpatch tool.
Is that where the error occurred in building? If so, it's easy to fix.
Yes, I think this was the place (but I'm not quiet sure anymore ). Simply
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25481.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
As the tree processor is the central component that is required
to run cocoon and as we currently just can't start 2.2
to test/implement anything else, I think we should see that
we get a runnable 2.2 asap.
What do you think
Upayavira wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip/
Using servlet-debug allows to connect the Eclipse debugger to the
running Jetty if needed. It also allows to do code hotswap on the
running server (I had some problems hotswapping code produced by the
JDK's javac).
How do you get the howswap to
Upayavira wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 11:47, Upayavira wrote:
I need a row submit action, that allows a form to be submitted for a
specific line in a repeater.
An example usecase would be on a selling site, you have a repeater
showing purchasable items, each with a
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
As the tree processor is the central component that is
required to run cocoon and as we currently just can't start
2.2 to test/implement anything else, I think we should see
that we get a
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
Stalled... I don't have much time for it now...
As the tree processor is the central component that is required to run cocoon and as we currently just can't start 2.2 to test/implement anything else, I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14327.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
From: Unico Hommes
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
As the tree processor is the central component that is
required to run cocoon and as we currently just can't start
2.2 to test/implement anything else, I think we
On 14.12.2003 14:38, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Hi,
whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
As the tree processor is the central component that is
required to run cocoon and as we currently just can't start
2.2 to test/implement anything else, I think we should see
that we
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
Stalled... I don't have much time for it now...
As the tree processor is the central component that is
required to run cocoon and as we currently just can't
Unico Hommes wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
As the tree processor is the central component that is
required to run cocoon and as we currently just can't start
2.2 to test/implement anything else, I think we should see
that
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 11:47, Upayavira wrote:
I need a row submit action, that allows a form to be submitted for
a specific line in a repeater.
An example usecase would be on a selling site, you have a repeater
showing purchasable
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip/
Using servlet-debug allows to connect the Eclipse debugger to the
running Jetty if needed. It also allows to do code hotswap on the
running server (I had some problems hotswapping code produced by the
JDK's javac).
How do
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25481.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 14.12.2003 18:12, Michael Wechner wrote:
Mmmh, but Epoz sends wellformed xhtml. The point is Epoz sends
text/html
as content-type, which is not handled by StreamGenerator(, yet).
I don't want to tidy anything, at the mom.
My question is:
Why does the StreamGenerator not support text/html??
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25481.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 14.12.2003 18:12, Michael Wechner wrote:
Mmmh, but Epoz sends wellformed xhtml. The point is Epoz sends
text/html
as content-type, which is not handled by StreamGenerator(, yet).
I don't want to tidy anything, at the mom.
My question is:
Why does the StreamGenerator
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25517.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25518.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25518.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25433.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I posted this to cocoon user list but did not get a helpful answer, so I
try again here. Sorry for double posting:
In one of our Generators we want to use Postgres as Datasource. In
web.xml we added the postgres driver this way:
init-param
param-nameload-class/param-name
30 matches
Mail list logo
