Re: Saxon as the default XSLT procesor

2004-01-03 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: ... I've done some tests on my machine using the XSLTBench and here is what I got: Saxon 6.5.3 -> 49.52 XalanJ 2.5.2 > 19.89 couldn't test XSLTC So, +1 to change to Saxon. I'm +1 to change to anything compatible that is faster than Xalan. But... I swapped Xalan

Re: Saxon as the default XSLT procesor

2004-01-03 Thread J.Pietschmann
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: But... I swapped Xalan with Saxon 6.5.3 in Forrest and I get a NPE :-( That's not unusual. Did you use the most recent Cocoon? I suppose there are no document() calls in the style sheet, because at least in the Cocoon releases I used it gets passed null as Source quite of

Re: Saxon as the default XSLT procesor

2004-01-03 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
J.Pietschmann wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: But... I swapped Xalan with Saxon 6.5.3 in Forrest and I get a NPE :-( That's not unusual. Did you use the most recent Cocoon? Almost. It's some quite recent dev version. I suppose there are no document() calls in the style sheet, There are. I'm gonn

Re: Saxon as the default XSLT procesor

2004-01-03 Thread J.Pietschmann
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: document() calls in the style sheet, There are. I'm gonna remove them soon, nut for now they are there, and will the possibility to use them will remain some time for backward compat. because at least in the Cocoon releases I used it gets passed null as Source quite ofte

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25879] New: - directory generator caching bug

2004-01-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Bug?] absolute redirection in flow appears not to be proxy safe

2004-01-03 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
I came across a very weird problem today. I had two cocoon applications that were once running in different JVM instances, both mapped to / and I moved them into a single Jetty instance mapped on /A and /B (for simplicity). Then I modified the ProxyPass settings and used the jetty web.xml trick

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25879] - directory generator caching bug

2004-01-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu