DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26566] - CLI/CocoonBean is broken with portal-block

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26566] - CLI/CocoonBean is broken with portal-block

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [cforms] XML Binding with HTMLArea

2004-02-09 Thread Ugo Cei
Andreas Hochsteger wrote: how can I use a string which can be edited by the HTMLArea widget in an XML binding? I'm afraid you'll have to do parsing/serialization by hand in your code. An HTMLArea is just a textarea with some DHTML and there is no support in CForms, AFAIK, for binding an XML docu

Re: Cleaning up unused namespace declaration

2004-02-09 Thread Ugo Cei
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Yeah, well, that doesn't help me because I have the namespace declarations already there in the document I want to process and it appears that xsl:copy copies over the namespace declarations everytime and it's not influenced by exclude-result-prefixes.

Re: Cleaning up unused namespace declaration

2004-02-09 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: I'm not normally bugged by namespace declarations which aren't used, but boy, something like this just can't go on without me to do something about it: http://apache.org/cocoon/directory/2.0"; xmlns:include="http://apache.org/cocoon/include/1.0"/> [taken from my blog

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Dimanche, 8 fév 2004, à 18:59 Europe/Zurich, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : ...Now, in general I totally agree with you, but I fear that this bug is in there for a long time, which means all 2.1.x releases have already this bug (perhaps I'm wrong)... In this case no problem to release with bug 26

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > Le Dimanche, 8 fév 2004, à 18:59 Europe/Zurich, Carsten > Ziegeler a écrit : > > > ...Now, in general I totally agree with you, but I fear > that this bug > > is in there for a long time, which means all 2.1.x releases have > > already this bug (perhaps I'm wron

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26785] New: - [Woody] Upload widget causes NPE

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [IMP] Release Showstoppers!

2004-02-09 Thread Stuart Roebuck
On 7 Feb 2004, at 2:36 pm, Geoff Howard wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Le Samedi, 7 fév 2004, à 15:15 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Howard a écrit : Vadim Gritsenko wrote: 5) Cacheable XSP is *painfully* slow! It takes 2 seconds per request!!!... Um, isn't that because the x

Re: [IMP] Release Showstoppers!

2004-02-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Lundi, 9 fév 2004, à 11:32 Europe/Zurich, Stuart Roebuck a écrit : On 7 Feb 2004, at 2:36 pm, Geoff Howard wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Le Samedi, 7 fév 2004, à 15:15 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Howard a écrit : Vadim Gritsenko wrote: 5) Cacheable XSP is *painfully* slo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Dimanche, 8 fév 2004, à 14:11 Europe/Zurich, Joerg Heinicke a écrit : http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon-2.1/lib/core/Attic/excalibur- store-20031211.jar I've tried with this jar instead of the one which is in CVS now and was able to reproduce the lockup problem, details at http://nago

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Lundi, 9 fév 2004, à 11:19 Europe/Zurich, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: ...But shouldn't we add prominent warnings to such issues, a link on the welcome page or something? Yes, but we have to be very careful with the formulation. Users shouldn't Get the impression that

Re: [IMP] Release Showstoppers!

2004-02-09 Thread Stuart Roebuck
On 9 Feb 2004, at 10:38 am, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Le Lundi, 9 fév 2004, à 11:32 Europe/Zurich, Stuart Roebuck a écrit : On 7 Feb 2004, at 2:36 pm, Geoff Howard wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Le Samedi, 7 fév 2004, à 15:15 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Howard a écrit : V

Re: [IMP] Release Showstoppers!

2004-02-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Lundi, 9 fév 2004, à 11:56 Europe/Zurich, Stuart Roebuck a écrit : ...Okay, it's me that's daft, I thought the conversation was talking about Cacheable XSP, not a demo of it... No problem - only those who write nothing never write something "daft" ;-) -Bertrand

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26785] - [Woody] Upload widget causes NPE

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[OT] javascript documentation tool

2004-02-09 Thread Robert Koberg
hi, I was wondering (hoping) someone may have come across a good tool for documenting javascript similar (or not) to javadoc. I have found: http://jsdoc.sourceforge.net/ but it does not document JS the way I write it :) which is like: function Shape() { var color = null; this.getColor = fu

Re: [OT] javascript documentation tool

2004-02-09 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Robert Koberg wrote: hi, I was wondering (hoping) someone may have come across a good tool for documenting javascript similar (or not) to javadoc. In Forrest CVS under scratchpad there is a javadoc like tool for javascript, but it's veery embrional. More than a suggestion for you to use

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26791] New: - o.a.c.c.l.p.j.JavaLanguage, incorrect disposal

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26791] - o.a.c.c.l.p.j.JavaLanguage, incorrect disposal

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26791] - [PATCH] o.a.c.c.l.p.j.JavaLanguage, incorrect disposal

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26792] New: - excalibur-xmlutil, o.a.e.x.i.JaxpParser, unreleased EntityResolver

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26793] New: - unclear contract regarding o.a.c.e.Request.get()

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Bug not solved: Bugzilla Bug 26054

2004-02-09 Thread H . vanderLinden
Hi, I got the CVS version of 2.1.4 this morning at around 9:30 and since then I have the problem mentioned in Bugzilla Bug 26054 Grave problem with Avalon Excalibur JispStore. I did a build clean webapp with the following properties files: [1] [2] I copied the resulting build tree to Tomcat 4.1.2

RE: Bug not solved: Bugzilla Bug 26054

2004-02-09 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Did you clear the temp-dir? -- Reinhard > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 4:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Bug not solved: Bugzilla Bug 26054 > > > Hi, > > I got the CVS version of 2.1.4 this morning

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26571] - redirecting from within a flow-called pipeline fails

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26054] - Grave problem with Avalon Excalibur JispStore

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25359] - [Roadmap] General - NEXT release

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26054] - Grave problem with Avalon Excalibur JispStore

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25359] - [Roadmap] General - NEXT release

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Bug not solved: Bugzilla Bug 26054

2004-02-09 Thread H . vanderLinden
No, sorry, forgot. After clearing the tempdir and the work dir I could not reproduce the error with the same set of actions. Sorry for the noise. Bye, Helma > -Original Message- > From: Reinhard Poetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 09 February 2004 16:19 > To: [EMAIL PROTECT

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26566] - CLI/CocoonBean is broken with portal-block

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26186] - Memory Leak caused by cocoon:// protocol

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26186] - Memory Leak caused by cocoon:// protocol

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25359] - [Roadmap] General - NEXT release

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [cforms] XML Binding with HTMLArea

2004-02-09 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On 9 Feb 2004, at 03:12, Ugo Cei wrote: Andreas Hochsteger wrote: how can I use a string which can be edited by the HTMLArea widget in an XML binding? I'm afraid you'll have to do parsing/serialization by hand in your code. An HTMLArea is just a textarea with some DHTML and there is no support

Re: Cleaning up unused namespace declaration

2004-02-09 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On 9 Feb 2004, at 03:16, Ugo Cei wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Yeah, well, that doesn't help me because I have the namespace declarations already there in the document I want to process and it appears that xsl:copy copies over the namespace declarations everytime and it's not influenced by ex

Re: Cleaning up unused namespace declaration

2004-02-09 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On 9 Feb 2004, at 04:40, Sylvain Wallez wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: I'm not normally bugged by namespace declarations which aren't used, but boy, something like this just can't go on without me to do something about it: http://apache.org/cocoon/directory/2.0"; xmlns:include="http://apache

Re: Cleaning up unused namespace declaration

2004-02-09 Thread Geoff Howard
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On 9 Feb 2004, at 04:40, Sylvain Wallez wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: I'm not normally bugged by namespace declarations which aren't used, but boy, something like this just can't go on without me to do something about it: http://apache.org/cocoon/directory/2.0"; xm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26186] - Memory Leak caused by cocoon:// protocol

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26186] - Memory Leak caused by cocoon:// protocol

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Cleaning up unused namespace declaration

2004-02-09 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On 9 Feb 2004, at 04:40, Sylvain Wallez wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: I'm not normally bugged by namespace declarations which aren't used, but boy, something like this just can't go on without me to do something about it: http://apache.org/cocoon/directory/2.0"; xm

Re: Cleaning up unused namespace declaration

2004-02-09 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Geoff Howard wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: On 9 Feb 2004, at 04:40, Sylvain Wallez wrote: A long time ago, I wrote a NamespaceNormalizer that works in two steps: 1 - record all SAX events (using XMLByteStreamCompiler) except namespace declarations which are stored separately, 2 - replay SAX e

Re: [reminder] board report

2004-02-09 Thread Alan
* Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-05 13:22]: > Le Jeudi, 5 f?v 2004, ? 09:21 Europe/Zurich, Steven Noels a ?crit : > >>...Hi folks - input for the board report is welcome, and due for next > >>Friday the 13th. > > Rough ideas (don't remember if the report is more technical or >

Re: [reminder] board report

2004-02-09 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Alan wrote: * Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-05 13:22]: Le Jeudi, 5 f?v 2004, ? 09:21 Europe/Zurich, Steven Noels a ?crit : ...Hi folks - input for the board report is welcome, and due for next Friday the 13th. Rough ideas (don't remember if the report is more t

Re: [reminder] board report

2004-02-09 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 09.02.2004 19:19, Sylvain Wallez wrote: -The Pipelines-Flow-Forms trio ... -^-^^ PFF??? PFF! :) Joerg

Re: [reminder] board report

2004-02-09 Thread Tim Larson
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:30:27PM +0100, Joerg Heinicke wrote: > On 09.02.2004 19:19, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > >>>-The Pipelines-Flow-Forms trio ... > > -^-^^ > > >PFF??? > > PFF! :) Great! Our project will now be known as the Cocoon PFF! framework. This will look g

Re: Cleaning up unused namespace declaration

2004-02-09 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Geoff Howard wrote: .. Couldn't you also configure it to remove all ns without checking if you know your output should have no other namespaces (as usually the case with xhtml)? That way you could avoid buffering in that special but common case. We can filter out all n

Re: Cleaning up unused namespace declaration

2004-02-09 Thread Geoff Howard
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Geoff Howard wrote: .. Couldn't you also configure it to remove all ns without checking if you know your output should have no other namespaces (as usually the case with xhtml)? That way you could avoid buffering in that special but common case. W

Re: AW: Browser based content in a multi-sub-sitemap system

2004-02-09 Thread Tuomo L
Thanks, I'll try this, although it's not as pretty as it could be in otherwise such a great framework... Looking forward for those resources with inheritance! :) -Tuomo On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Rottmann, Lars wrote: > > This is exactly what we do, too. We have put our device-dependent stuff into > o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26186] - Memory Leak caused by cocoon:// protocol

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26186] - Memory Leak caused by cocoon:// protocol

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26791] - [PATCH] o.a.c.c.l.p.j.JavaLanguage, incorrect disposal

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26792] - excalibur-xmlutil, o.a.e.x.i.JaxpParser, unreleased EntityResolver

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26791] - [PATCH] o.a.c.c.l.p.j.JavaLanguage, incorrect disposal

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26751] - Cocoon gets web-app_2_2.dtd from flres.java.Sun.COM at startup

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25359] - [Roadmap] General - NEXT release

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26751] - Cocoon gets web-app_2_2.dtd from flres.java.Sun.COM at startup

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu