Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6

Hi,all: in 2.1.6,Forms add widget state.I have test it yesterday and found some problems and questions. Questions: In V2 flowscript,I can set widget state: var name=form.lookupWidget("name"); name.state="disabled"; but in V1,I can get but set will produce an error:

Re: site update - please review

Upayavira wrote: David Crossley wrote: Upayavira wrote: Okay. My request was more to do with "have I run Forrest right". I should have made that more clear. There are two aspects. * The person who ran the 'forrest' command would have seen the "Build Successful" note. * Any of us can review Upayavi

Re: site update - please review

Le 21 nov. 04, à 09:43, Upayavira a écrit : ...I've just run Forrest and have uploaded the site to: http://www.apache.org/~upayavira/site/.. I have a looked at a few pages that I know, everything looks ok to me. Thanks for this! -Bertrand smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Release and updating the website

Upayavira wrote: I see you've fixed some of these on the wiki. Thanks. Also, the page refers to a default.properties file. I can't find such a file, nor can I find any reference to it in Cocoon's build target files. Am I supposed to use a property to set it, or environment variable, or a local.

Re: Release and updating the website

Upayavira wrote: David Crossley wrote: I'll do that too, if I can get Forrest to work. Unfortunately the above link doesn't entirely make sense. Would you please explain that obscure comment. Let us all help to fix the instructions then. Sorry, wasn't trying to be cryptic - I was referring to th

Re: site update - please review

David Crossley wrote: Upayavira wrote: Ralph Goers wrote: Upayavira wrote: Hi, I've just run Forrest and have uploaded the site to: http://www.apache.org/~upayavira/site/ Can you take a look, and make sure I've run the Forrest process correctly? If this looks okay (I'm aware of a couple of detail

Re: generating the docs with Forrest

Le 21 nov. 04, à 02:14, David Crossley a écrit : ...So keep using Forrest-0.5.1 which worked the last time that i rebuilt the website... ok. ...Also tried with forrest 0.5.1, no success either (tried "forrest" not "build site"). Isn't it 'build docs'? The Cocoon build system generates some additi

Re: Release and updating the website

Upayavira wrote: David Crossley wrote: I'll do that too, if I can get Forrest to work. Unfortunately the above link doesn't entirely make sense. Would you please explain that obscure comment. Let us all help to fix the instructions then. Sorry, wasn't trying to be cryptic - I was referring to th

Re: Release and updating the website

David Crossley wrote: I'll do that too, if I can get Forrest to work. Unfortunately the above link doesn't entirely make sense. Would you please explain that obscure comment. Let us all help to fix the instructions then. Sorry, wasn't trying to be cryptic - I was referring to the wiki instruction

Re: Release and updating the website

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, David Crossley wrote: > Upayavira wrote: > > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > >> Le 19 nov. 04, Γ  17:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a Γ©crit : > >> > >>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >>> > Le 19 nov. 04, Ξ° 16:05, Upayavira a ΞΉcrit : > > > ...Thus,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32342] New: - Inconsistent Handling on empty element namespace uri

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

2.1.6 forms block swan link is broken

There's no swan directory in forms directory. Roy Huang

2.1.6 build failed on block javaflow with zip file source

Hi,all: I download zip file source of 2.1.6, build on win/32 with java 1.4.2.Everything's fine but javaflow block.Errors in attachment.When I exclude javaflow block,the build is successful. Please check it,thanks. Roy Huang cocoon-block-javaflow-compile: Compiling 5 source files

Re: site update - please review

Upayavira wrote: Ralph Goers wrote: Upayavira wrote: Hi, I've just run Forrest and have uploaded the site to: http://www.apache.org/~upayavira/site/ Can you take a look, and make sure I've run the Forrest process correctly? If this looks okay (I'm aware of a couple of details, e.g. jimi), I'll m

Re: Release and updating the website

Upayavira wrote: Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Le 19 nov. 04, Ã 17:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a Ãcrit : On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Le 19 nov. 04, Î 16:05, Upayavira a Îcrit : ...Thus, the site needs to be regenerated with Forrest, which, to date, I haven't done. You probably know this

[CForms] aggregatefield on date for separate input of date and ti me - please help

Guys, I want to build an aggregatefield to enter date and time in separated fields/widgets, but store them in 1 Date() variable. I got as far as a proper display of the current date and time in the appropriate fields, but on changing the time and pressing submit I get "invalid date" 2 questions:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32336] - status-code on serializer not expanding variables

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32336] - status-code on serializer not expanding variables

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32336] New: - status-code on serializer not expanding variables

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: choose/when: container or control-structure?

Tim Larson wrote: The use of a choose in the form model should be invisible to the form template and form binding, just like use of a choose in the form template is invisible to the form model. I don't agree with this: a choose defines a set of widgets that will be present or not in the form de

Re: site update - please review

Ralph Goers wrote: Upayavira wrote: Hi, I've just run Forrest and have uploaded the site to: http://www.apache.org/~upayavira/site/ Can you take a look, and make sure I've run the Forrest process correctly? If this looks okay (I'm aware of a couple of details, e.g. jimi), I'll make some changes

Re: site update - please review

Upayavira wrote: Hi, I've just run Forrest and have uploaded the site to: http://www.apache.org/~upayavira/site/ Can you take a look, and make sure I've run the Forrest process correctly? If this looks okay (I'm aware of a couple of details, e.g. jimi), I'll make some changes (e.g. CVS->SVN, 2.1

site update - please review

Hi, I've just run Forrest and have uploaded the site to: http://www.apache.org/~upayavira/site/ Can you take a look, and make sure I've run the Forrest process correctly? If this looks okay (I'm aware of a couple of details, e.g. jimi), I'll make some changes (e.g. CVS->SVN, 2.1.6->news, etc), the