Automated Cocoon Unit tests failed!
Full log file if this unit test run is available here:
http://nagoya.apache.org/~vadim/cocoon-test-log-20041122.log
Last messages from the log file:
==
[foreach] reader-mime-type.xml:39
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
I want to build an aggregatefield to enter date and time in separated
fields/widgets, but store them in 1 Date() variable.
I got as far as a proper display of the current date and time in the
appropriate fields, but on changing the time and pressing submit I get
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23118.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 11:12 +0100, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Hi,
I need to put two forms onto one page.
Scenario: a homepage showing a selection of 'products', displayed as a
repeater on a form, and a login form.
These need to be separate HTML forms, so that
roy huang wrote:
Hi,all:
I download zip file source of 2.1.6, build on win/32 with java
1.4.2.Everything's fine but javaflow block.Errors in attachment.When I
exclude javaflow block,the build is successful.
Please check it,thanks.
Roy Huang
please check the bcel jar.
do
Thanks for replying.
According to the xReporter docs
(http://new.cocoondev.org/xreporter/docs/core/ 91
) following expression could work:
SetTime(date, number, number, number)
Yes I noticed after sending this mail.
2: how do I prevent the time widget from styled as a date field
Bruno Dumon wrote:
I think one problem is our flowscript API:
var form = new Form(...);
form.show(mypipeline, bizdata);
This way you can only show one form a page. Maybe we can do somethink like
var multiform = new Multiform({form1 : form1, form2 : form2);
multiform.show(myMultiformPipeline,
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 11:38 +0100, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
I think one problem is our flowscript API:
var form = new Form(...);
form.show(mypipeline, bizdata);
This way you can only show one form a page. Maybe we can do somethink like
var multiform = new
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for replying.
According to the xReporter docs
(http://new.cocoondev.org/xreporter/docs/core/ 91
) following expression could work:
SetTime(date, number, number, number)
Yes I noticed after sending this mail.
2: how do I prevent the time widget from styled as a
How about validation of the time?
What's your validation szenario?
Nothing more than it should be a valid time in 24h format and seconds are
not necessary. In this case I want to enter a date and time of an
appointment.
Since the date is one widget, I'd like the
time widget also to
roy huang wrote:
Hi,all:
in 2.1.6,Forms add widget state.I have test it yesterday and found some
problems and questions.
Questions:
In V2 flowscript,I can set widget state:
var name=form.lookupWidget(name);
name.state=disabled;
but in V1,I can get but set will
Are there any docs on this?
or use cases ?
We have done a solution where we have one huge form model, and then the
template is devide in multiple tabs ,It all works great but now we're
trying to structure the validation system (freshly speaking)
This MultiForms might be the solution to our
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 15:32 +0100, oceatoon wrote:
Are there any docs on this?
Over here:
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/userdocs/forms/templatetransformer.html
or use cases ?
I wouldn't know, I haven't ever had the need. Upayavira had one.
We have done a solution where we have one huge form
My apologies, I will fix this.
regards Jeremy
On 19 Nov 2004, at 15:39, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
The new QueryBeanBlock hasn't been added to blocks.properties. AFAIK
this needs a new project in gump.xml and then there is an Ant task
generating blocks.properties.
Could someone knowing about the
IIUC an aggregated widget is a combination of a field and container widget. If I
add a validator, the aggregated value is validated and an error is added to
the aggregated widget. But how can I display it? After the FormsTransformer, the
aggregated widget element has been removed and only its
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31887.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
oceatoon wrote:
Are there any docs on this?
or use cases ?
We have done a solution where we have one huge form model, and then the
template is devide in multiple tabs ,It all works great but now we're
trying to structure the validation system (freshly speaking)
This MultiForms might be the
Zwijnaarde(*), Belgium, Oct 19th 2004
Daisy 1.1 released
Outerthought is proud to announce the second release of Daisy, the Open
Source CMS framework, shipping with a Wiki-on-steroids-like Cocoon CMS
web application.
Only a month after its initial release during the Cocoon GetTogether,
Daisy
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
IIUC an aggregated widget is a combination of a field and container
widget. If I add a validator, the aggregated value is validated and an
error is added to the aggregated widget. But how can I display it? After
the FormsTransformer, the aggregated widget element has been
No other bcel jav but jakarta-bcel-20040329.jar,ship with the zip file
format source.
Roy Huang
From: Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2.1.6 build failed on block javaflow with zip file source
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:00:25 +0100
roy
Using output state did solve my problem ii),if we can access/change
widget's value through flowscript.But if invisible state just make widget
*not visible*,the UI shouldn't throw exception .Under this condition user
must encode in flowscript and jxTemplate to make invisible state work,it
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
oceatoon wrote:
Are there any docs on this?
or use cases ?
We have done a solution where we have one huge form model, and then the
template is devide in multiple tabs ,It all works great but now we're
trying to structure the validation system (freshly speaking)
This
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 15:32 +0100, oceatoon wrote:
Are there any docs on this?
Over here:
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/userdocs/forms/templatetransformer.html
Thx.
or use cases ?
I wouldn't know, I haven't ever had the need. Upayavira had one.
ok
We have done a
[Moving a private email to dev@ as it's really where it should be discussed]
Luca Garulli wrote:
Hi,
my customer want a minimal client-side validation for same fields. We
are using CForms and seems to be lack of this feature.
I'd like to have a single place where to describe validation rules:
the
Looking at our generators it seems to me that it shoudl be possible to
build a general purpose generator that works for many data sources
right out of the box. In Pseudo code it would look more or less like:
private DataSource source = null;
public void setup (SourceResolver res, Map om, String
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, David Crossley wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
I see you've fixed some of these on the wiki. Thanks. Also, the page
refers to a default.properties file. I can't find such a file, nor can I
find any reference to it in Cocoon's build target files. Am I supposed
to use a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32348.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32348.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32348.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
[Moving a private email to dev@ as it's really where it should be
[discussed]
Luca Garulli wrote:
Hi,
my customer want a minimal client-side validation for same fields. We
are using CForms and seems to be lack of this feature.
I'd like to have a single place where to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32348.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I want to place multiple webapps under one jetty container. Thing is
after stopping a web application via jetty administration panel I am
still not able to delete cocoon's log files.
Is this an intended behaviour? If not is it jetty's or cocoon's fault
for not closing log files?
--
Leszek
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, David Crossley wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Okay. My request was more to do with have I run Forrest right. I
should have made that more clear.
There are two aspects.
* The person who ran the 'forrest' command
would have
No other bcel jav but jakarta-bcel-20040329.jar,ship with the zip file
format source.
hm... please check again (e.g. by removing the shapshot jar)
that's exactly what you get when you compile javaflow against bcel 5.1
cheers
--
Torsten
In theory we can have some JS script that can be usable in client AND
server sides. If these scripts contains no dependencies with
flowscript objects (cocoon, etc) and Java code we can deploy to both
sides!
However what I'd like to see is to reuse the validation rules in the
form-definition.
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
IIUC an aggregated widget is a combination of a field and container
widget. If I add a validator, the aggregated value is validated and
an error is added to the aggregated widget. But how can I display it?
After the FormsTransformer, the aggregated
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
IIUC an aggregated widget is a combination of a field and container
widget. If I add a validator, the aggregated value is validated and
an error is added to the aggregated widget. But how can I display it?
After the
oceatoon wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
[Moving a private email to dev@ as it's really where it should be
[discussed]
Luca Garulli wrote:
Hi,
my customer want a minimal client-side validation for same fields. We
are using CForms and seems to be lack of this feature.
I'd like to have a single
Luca Garulli wrote:
In theory we can have some JS script that can be usable in client AND
server sides. If these scripts contains no dependencies with
flowscript objects (cocoon, etc) and Java code we can deploy to both
sides!
Considering that the object model are very different in the form and
oceatoon said:
Sorry to walk into post but this mailing list is amasing, answers come up
simultaneously to my personnal questions, thx for reading my mind ;) I am
exactly on this problem coz formy case Server side validations is a bit
too
heavy. I'd be glad to help if needed since our
It seems to me that what we want are multiple forms on a page and what
is being proposed is a way to have one big form that gets processed in
pieces. To me the stumbling block seems to be in Forms.js. When we
display a form using showForm the only form it knows about is its self.
In order to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32336.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
A while back, Ugo brought up his idea for A Groovy Kind of Sitemap
which met with some friction. On the one hand was the camp that felt
that the sitemap/flowscript dichotomy was a case of overseparation of
concerns. On the other was the camp that absolutely wanted to keep a
general purpose
I recheck all the lib,cocoon 2.1.6 change endorsed lib xalan.jar to
xalan-2.6.1-dev-20041008T0304.jar.My jdk endorsed is still
xalan-2.6.0.jar.Replace the xalan jar,everything's fine now.
Thanks.
Roy Huang
- Original Message -
From: Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Hi:
I wrote a new task for the Cocoon build system. The new task build the
eclipse project files only for the blocks included in
[local.]blocks.properties.
The new task also only include the optional libraries based on the user
choosed blocks.
The motivation was: my computer has only 768 MB of
David Crossley wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Also, when I did run Forrest, I really had to dig to find the
generated pages, whereas I would have expected them to have been
generated in place, i.e. into the place from which I'd commit them
directly to SVN.
We can change the location of where the
roy huang dijo:
I recheck all the lib,cocoon 2.1.6 change endorsed lib xalan.jar to
xalan-2.6.1-dev-20041008T0304.jar.My jdk endorsed is still
xalan-2.6.0.jar.Replace the xalan jar,everything's fine now.
Thanks.
What xalan version you have in jdk endorsed?
Best Regards,
Antonio
FYI, here's a good catch from Gregor:
De: Gregor J. Rothfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 23 novembre 2004 02:34:52 GMT+01:00
À: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet: Saab uses Cocoon
i didnt know, because it was before my time:
http://www.saab.com/index.xml
seems to still run on cocoon 1.8 :)
--
Gregor J. Rothfuss
Le 22 nov. 04, à 23:44, Sylvain Wallez a écrit :
...So the idea now is that a validator produces an XML representation
of itself, which could be a simple as it's definition translated to
the fi: namespace
...It's then the job of the presentation XSLs to transform fi:range
into something
It was xalan-2.6.0.jar,build will fail,replace with
xalan-2.6.1-dev-20041008T0304.jar,it's fine.
Roy Huang
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [SOLVED]Re: 2.1.6 build failed on block
Le 23 nov. 04, à 06:42, David Crossley a écrit :
David Crossley wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Also, when I did run Forrest, I really had to dig to find the
generated pages, whereas I would have expected them to have been
generated in place, i.e. into the place from which I'd commit them
directly to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32263.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
52 matches
Mail list logo
