Is trunk supposed to be a working version?

Guys, Is the version in the trunk supposed to be a fully working version? I checked it out to do some checking on the HTMLarea sample but ran into some errors. Net result: cocoon servlet stops with: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at sun.reflect.Nati

Re: Is trunk supposed to be a working version?

On 28.11.2004 10:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys, Is the version in the trunk supposed to be a fully working version? I checked it out to do some checking on the HTMLarea sample but ran into some errors. Net result: cocoon servlet stops with: Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32419] New: - [patch] client side validation for CForms

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32419] - [patch] client side validation for CForms

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32419] - [patch] client side validation for CForms

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32419] - [patch] client side validation for CForms

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32419] - [patch] client side validation for CForms

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[OT] input type="image" request param names

In our CForms Action.java [1] there is a comment about an IE bug with appending 'x' and 'y' to the name of the input field when it is of type image: Special workaround an IE bug for : in that case, IE only sends "foo.x" and "foo.y" and not "foo" whereas standards-compliant browsers such as Moz

Re: Repeater addRow action button to link??

Sylvain Wallez wrote: > oceatoon wrote: > >>I tried to retreive your latest update of field styling but didn't find >>the new template you described , is it all ready up on svn ? >> >> > > Well, it was for a few hours, and then got overriden by Reinhard's sync > between 2.2 and 2.1 :-/ > > I

Re: [OT] input type="image" request param names

Joerg Heinicke wrote: In our CForms Action.java [1] there is a comment about an IE bug with appending 'x' and 'y' to the name of the input field when it is of type image: Special workaround an IE bug for : in that case, IE only sends "foo.x" and "foo.y" and not "foo" whereas standards-complian

Re: Question and Suggessions about forms block in 2.1.6

Hi Sylvain: I tried this before but failed(see my first mail in this thread),but today I found the key: I change import url in jx_template from to: the state invisibled work. jx-macros.xml is the new file in 2.1.6,can it replace template.jx? Roy Huang From: Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTE

RE: Is trunk supposed to be a working version?

Although had checked out the trunk in a new, clean directory, I had some errors when compiling the javaflow block. I excluded the javaflow block and all blocks that depend on it and did a rebuild. I suppose there must have been some compiled classes left from the excluded blocks. After a "build cle

RE: HTMLArea in tables - it works

Hi Reinhard, > I tested with IE6 (WinXP SP2) and Firefox_1.0. It should work > in IE5.5 too. > Maybe somebody could verify this. > > Please test whether everything works fine for you and give > feedback. When > everything works as expected for others too, I'll port it to > 2.1.X-branch. I t

Re: [OT] input type="image" request param names

On 28.11.2004 15:59, Sylvain Wallez wrote: In our CForms Action.java [1] there is a comment about an IE bug with appending 'x' and 'y' to the name of the input field when it is of type image: Special workaround an IE bug for : in that case, IE only sends "foo.x" and "foo.y" and not "foo" wherea

Re: Is trunk supposed to be a working version?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Although had checked out the trunk in a new, clean directory, I had some errors when compiling the javaflow block. Could you please elaborate a bit more on that. cheers -- Torsten

Re: Is trunk supposed to be a working version?

On 28.11.2004 17:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, I did come across a compile error (see bugzilla #32412). Makes at least more sense and is mostly easier to solve. Seems like a missing dependency. Joerg

[CForms] How to iterate other a model?

Hello, is it possible to iterate other a model object within a flowscript? The model object was retrieved before by calling form.getModel(). Another question: Is there an API doc available for this object? Thanx. Stephan

Re: [CForms] How to iterate other a model?

Stephan Coboos wrote: Hello, is it possible to iterate other a model object within a flowscript? The model object was retrieved before by calling form.getModel(). Yes, you can use lookupWidget() that accepts a path-like syntax (i.e. "a/b/c" or "../d") Another question: Is there an API doc avail

RE: Is trunk supposed to be a working version?

> Could you please elaborate a bit more on that. It complained about missing ...bcel variables/classes etc. Odd, because the bcel jar is present. If you need it to be more specific, I'll have to compile it again with all blocks included. Bye, Helma

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31760] - Handle / Semaphore Leak?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Design] JXTG 2.0

Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Leszek Gawron wrote: Jonas Ekstedt wrote: On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 20:50 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Hello. I have made an attempt to implement what you describe above (filed it in bugzilla http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi? id=25288). The block contains a JXT

Javaflow in trunk not compiling [was: RE: Is trunk supposed to be a working version?]

Torsten, Here are the error messages: cocoon-block-javaflow-compile: Compiling 28 source files to D:\svn\cocoon-trunk\build\cocoon-2.2.0-dev\blocks\javaflow\dest D:\svn\cocoon-trunk\src\blocks\javaflow\java\org\apache\cocoon\components\fl ow\java\ContinuationClassLoader.java:111: cannot resolve s

Re: Is trunk supposed to be a working version?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you please elaborate a bit more on that. It complained about missing ...bcel variables/classes etc. Odd, because the bcel jar is present. If you need it to be more specific, I'll have to compile it again with all blocks included. Bye, Helma Are you running

Re: Javaflow in trunk not compiling [was: RE: Is trunk supposed to be a working version?]

...definitly a bcel classpath/versioning problem. See here... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=110109403725802&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=110117821012478&w=2 Let me know if you don't get it working cheers -- Torsten

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30043] - [PATCH] xml2html.xslt does not work on IE

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25288] - JXTemplate: One base implementation which is easily extensible

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

CForms's Chinese FormsMessages file

Hi I check the file shipped with 2.1.6,found its encoding is wrong.I believe it is because is edit by someone using incorrect encoding.I attach the correct one. Roy Huang 此域是必须的 不是一个有效的{0}类型. 整数 小数 小数 小数 整数 日期 时间 日期时间 应为{0}个字符. 应包含{0}到{1}个字符. 应包含至少{0}

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30043] - [PATCH] xml2html.xslt does not work on IE

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32259] - bugzilla link broken

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32408] - typo on the date-selector doc

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26042] - [PATCH] I18nTransformer Multiple catalog search

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27878] - [PATCH]XMLResourceBundleFactory is missing catalogs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28424] - [PATCH] Allow applications access to the start and end of a request

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28860] - [Patch] Allow any LoggerManager to be used

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30738] - [Patch] don't compile sample sources if samples have been disabled

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31134] - [PATCH] JXPathMetaModule incorrectly checks for null parameter (can't happen) instead of empty string.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu