nafise hassani wrote:
Hi
what's your idea about the comparison that takes
between
orbeon and cocoon in this site:
http://www.orbeon.com/community/cocoon
All that we can do is laugh at the innacuracies of those
who attempt comparison with Cocoon, e.g. the Orbeon fallacies:
quote
David Crossley wrote:
There is no point wasting energy on defending Cocoon.
Just get on with making our own ship robust.
I can offer two links:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=110683337721591w=2 and
http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/CocoonDocumentationSystemHowTo
--
Reinhard
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
There is no point wasting energy on defending Cocoon.
Just get on with making our own ship robust.
I can offer two links:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=110683337721591w=2 and
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 28 January 2005 15:07, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
mainly on the way it handles pipelines (but IIRC it was Cocoon 1.x)
No pipelines in Cocoon 1.x, it was called a Reactor pattern and the main reason for the birth of Cocoon 2.
I know, I know. I started with
Automated Cocoon Unit tests failed!
Full log file if this unit test run is available here:
http://nagoya.apache.org/~vadim/cocoon-test-log-20050128.log
Last messages from the log file:
==
Testsuite
Hi Cocooners,
Please excuse the noise, but I think this conference could be of
interest to you guys, and it's cheap!
(disclaimer: I'm on the organizing team).
Among what might be of particular interest to the Cocoon community:
we're going to have Stefano Mazzocchi for Friday's keynote (with a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33286.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33287.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33287.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
As you all know, the new portal engine, while powerful in functionality has
been somewhat :-) lacking in tool support. So, because we know this is an
itch many people would like scratched, we've developed a basic
tool-framework for the cocoon portal-engine.
The idea behind the framework is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33178.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
I need help to fix a weird bug [1] that appears when a cocoon: URL is
used after a sitemap mount with pass-through=true causes coming back
to the parent sitemap.
In such case, and only when cocoon: is used (normal files work fine),
the environment context is not restored to its proper
Jens Maukisch wrote:
Hi,
As you all know, the new portal engine, while powerful in functionality has
been somewhat :-) lacking in tool support. So, because we know this is an
itch many people would like scratched, we've developed a basic
tool-framework for the cocoon portal-engine.
Thanks!
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33287.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Hi all,
I need help to fix a weird bug [1] that appears when a cocoon: URL is
used after a sitemap mount with pass-through=true causes coming back
to the parent sitemap.
In such case, and only when cocoon: is used (normal files work fine),
the environment context is not
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Hi all,
I need help to fix a weird bug [1] that appears when a cocoon: URL
is used after a sitemap mount with pass-through=true causes coming
back to the parent sitemap.
In such case, and only when cocoon: is used (normal files work
fine), the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33287.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33292.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33292.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
In o.a.c.components.jms.AbstractMessagePublisher there is the following
comment in the initialize method:
private int m_acknowledgeMode;
. . .
public void initialize() throws Exception {
// set the default acknowledge mode
// concrete implementations may override
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33287.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32212.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32212.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33233.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33287.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:27:32 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32212
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-28 19:27 ---
I have added this feature in a different way - didn't know about this patch :|
On Vie, 28 de Enero de 2005, 2:23, David Crossley dijo:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
There is no point wasting energy on defending Cocoon.
Just get on with making our own ship robust.
I can offer two links:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=110683337721591w=2
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project cocoon-block-template has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project cocoon-block-forms has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project cocoon-block-portal has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
30 matches
Mail list logo
