Re: Sitemap problem... help! :-)

OK, I figured out the problem (qv. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11070194514&r=1&w=2). I had one matcher in the root sitemap that handled all continuation URIs, even those that are generated from pipelines in subsitemaps. So apparently, the context for the redirector invoked from the flo

Re: [announcement/proposal] Moving Linotype out of Cocoon

Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: For this reason, I propose that we discontinue the distribution of Linotype inside cocoon as a block, by deprecating it in the next 2.1.x release and by removing it alltogether in 2.2 Of course, the project will remain an open development project and I will welcome peop

[announcement/proposal] Moving Linotype out of Cocoon

As some of you know, my personal blog runs on this software called "Linotype" that I wrote for myself (on top of cocoon) and then donated to the project to show an example of how simple it was to build even a real-life webapp with flow. For this reason, Linotype ended being a cocoon example, ra

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33178] - Mounting a sitemap with pass-through alters resolveURI

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33097] - caching of i18n XMLResourceBundle's is faulty with multiple locations

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33097] - caching of i18n XMLResourceBundle's is faulty with multiple locations

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Wrong restauration of environment context after pass-through

Sylvain Wallez wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: I don't understand what is this "last context": does it have to behave like a stack, or is it the context in which the internal pipeline has been built? It is the context in which the internal pipeline w

Re: Wrong restauration of environment context after pass-through

Carsten Ziegeler wrote: I just applied a fix; the test-case now runs without errors and other things still seem to work :) - AFAI can tell this fix shouldn't cause any unwanted site effects. Thinking further after my previous post: I think there will be a problem with your solution if there are

Re: Wrong restauration of environment context after pass-through

Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: I don't understand what is this "last context": does it have to behave like a stack, or is it the context in which the internal pipeline has been built? It is the context in which the internal pipeline will run; it's not a s

Re: Wrong restauration of environment context after pass-through

I just applied a fix; the test-case now runs without errors and other things still seem to work :) - AFAI can tell this fix shouldn't cause any unwanted site effects. So, if it works, well...greetings to your project :) Carsten Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33178] - Mounting a sitemap with pass-through alters resolveURI

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Wrong restauration of environment context after pass-through

Sylvain Wallez wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: I don't understand what is this "last context": does it have to behave like a stack, or is it the context in which the internal pipeline has been built? It is the context in which the internal pipeline will run; it's not a stack. Internal pipeline c

Re: Sitemap problem... help! :-)

Mark Lundquist wrote: I posted the following a couple of days ago on the users list. I've discovered a wee bit more information (see below). Anyway, the problem (I'm using Cocoon 2.1.6): On Jan 26, 2005, at 5:42 PM, Mark Lundquist wrote: Hi, I'm having trouble figuring out this problem... I ha

Re: Sitemap problem... help! :-)

On Jan 29, 2005, at 9:07 AM, Mark Lundquist wrote: <...snip> This morning I modified o.a.c.matching.AbstractPreparableMatcher to log failed matches actually it is o.a.c.components.treeprocessor.sitemap.PreparableMatchNode that I instrumented. — mark

Sitemap problem... help! :-)

I posted the following a couple of days ago on the users list. I've discovered a wee bit more information (see below). Anyway, the problem (I'm using Cocoon 2.1.6): On Jan 26, 2005, at 5:42 PM, Mark Lundquist wrote: Hi, I'm having trouble figuring out this problem... I have a flowscript that d

Re: Wrong restauration of environment context after pass-through

Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Hi all, I need help to fix a weird bug [1] that appears when a "cocoon:" URL is used after a sitemap mount with pass-through="true" causes coming back to the parent sitemap. In such case, and only when "cocoon:" is used (normal files work fine), the

Re: Wrong restauration of environment context after pass-through

Sylvain Wallez wrote: Hi all, I need help to fix a weird bug [1] that appears when a "cocoon:" URL is used after a sitemap mount with pass-through="true" causes coming back to the parent sitemap. In such case, and only when "cocoon:" is used (normal files work fine), the environment context is

Re: svn commit: r149029 - /cocoon/trunk/gump.xml

Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 29.01.2005 13:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: cziegeler URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=149029 Log: Fix dependencies for portal Modified: cocoon/trunk/gump.xml Url: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/cocoon/trunk/gump.xml?view=diff&rev=149029&p1=cocoon/trun

Re: svn commit: r149029 - /cocoon/trunk/gump.xml

On 29.01.2005 13:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: cziegeler URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=149029 Log: Fix dependencies for portal Modified: cocoon/trunk/gump.xml Url: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/cocoon/trunk/gump.xml?view=diff&rev=149029&p1=cocoon/trunk/gump.xml&r1=149028&p

[GUMP@brutus]: Project cocoon-block-portal (in module cocoon) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project cocoon-block-portal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32212] - [PATCH] Enable development of blocks outside of cocoon source tree

Geoff Howard wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:27:32 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32212 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-28 19:27 --- I have added this feature in a different way - didn't know about

[GUMP@brutus]: Project cocoon-block-forms (in module cocoon) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project cocoon-block-forms has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[GUMP@brutus]: Project cocoon-block-template (in module cocoon) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project cocoon-block-template has an issue affecting its community integration. This issu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33287] - [PATCH] [Portal] PortalTools-Framework

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33233] - [PATCH] Portal: TabContentAcspect: Added parameters show-all-nav and include-selected

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu