[GUMP@brutus]: Project cocoon (in module cocoon) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project cocoon has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 36 pr

Re: svn commit: r157439 - cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/bean/CocoonWrapper.java

FYI, I don't know how many of you subscribe to the Apache legal list, but there were messages there saying it is not necessary to have more than the first year (in this case 1999) in the copyright. Ralph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: vgritsenko Date: Mon Mar 14 09:23:40 2005 New Revision: 157

Re: [cforms] Widget states in request-scoped forms

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:44:44PM +0100, Reinhard Poetz wrote: > > Today I've tried to run a form that uses the widget state "INVISIBLE" and > when the form state is saved in the request. (my experiments are based on > the form1 action example) > > If I use the event framework to change the st

Re: [cforms] Widget states in request-scoped forms

Reinhard Poetz wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Today I've tried to run a form that uses the widget state "INVISIBLE" and when the form state is saved in the request. (my experiments are based on the form1 action example) If I use the event framework to change the state from AC

Re: [cforms] Widget states in request-scoped forms

Sylvain Wallez wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Today I've tried to run a form that uses the widget state "INVISIBLE" and when the form state is saved in the request. (my experiments are based on the form1 action example) If I use the event framework to change the state from ACTIVE to INVISIBLE, to

Re: [cforms] Widget states in request-scoped forms

Reinhard Poetz wrote: Today I've tried to run a form that uses the widget state "INVISIBLE" and when the form state is saved in the request. (my experiments are based on the form1 action example) If I use the event framework to change the state from ACTIVE to INVISIBLE, toggling works, but the

RE: CForms samples for 2.1.7 - i18n question - errors SOLVED except for one

Hi Jeremy, > you can specify the catalogue name in i18n attributes like this: > > Thanks for replying, I already deducted this from a discussion some years ago where Bruno suggested this. Talking about hidden docs/features. ;-) > However, the forms catalogue has always been the default > (wh

[cforms] Widget states in request-scoped forms

Today I've tried to run a form that uses the widget state "INVISIBLE" and when the form state is saved in the request. (my experiments are based on the form1 action example) If I use the event framework to change the state from ACTIVE to INVISIBLE, toggling works, but the value of the changed w

Re: [2.1.7-dev] o.a.c.util.Deprecation error on java 1.3.1_15

Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi: After "svn up", I compiled the 2.1.7-dev sucessfully using 1.3.1_15, but it does not run [see stacktrace on the screen below]. The code compiles and run OK in java 1.4.2_07. org.mortbay.util.MultiEx

Re: CForms samples for 2.1.7 - i18n question - errors SOLVED except for one

Hi Helma you can specify the catalogue name in i18n attributes like this: However, the forms catalogue has always been the default (which IMHO is a nuisance) have you changed this? regards Jeremy On 12 Mar 2005, at 22:50, Linden H van der (MI) wrote: It finally clicked: I added the extra i18n ke

Re: [cForms] Errors coming from service layer

Reinhard Poetz wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Vilya Harvey wrote: Reinhard Pötz wrote: Imagine following scenario: You have a service layer that is exposed as web services. cForms already does as much validation as possible but some complex checks can only be performed by the

Re: [cForms] Errors coming from service layer

On Mar 14, 2005, at 9:50 AM, Reinhard Poetz wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Vilya Harvey wrote: Reinhard Pötz wrote: Imagine following scenario: You have a service layer that is exposed as web services. cForms already does as much validation as possible but some complex checks

Re: Client side validation for CForms

Hi, I've committed a new version of client-side validation. New version with the following improvements: - I18N for all error messages - support for min/max/exact length and range constraints - support for regexp contraints (specify a pattern to match) - immediate check for type field: you cannot

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32419] - [patch] client side validation for CForms

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32419] - [patch] client side validation for CForms

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33013] - Cocoon incorrectly handles form encoding when form is passed as "multipart/form-data"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32419] - [patch] client side validation for CForms

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32419] - [patch] client side validation for CForms

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [cForms] Errors coming from service layer

Sylvain Wallez wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Thank you! This means that the service layer is aware of which widgets exist? I'm not sure if I (and especially my customer) likes this bi-directional dependency... Nono! Your validation code has to catch the exception and translate it into a validati

Re: [cForms] Errors coming from service layer

Sylvain Wallez wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Vilya Harvey wrote: Reinhard Pötz wrote: Imagine following scenario: You have a service layer that is exposed as web services. cForms already does as much validation as possible but some complex checks can only be performed by the backend. If I call a

Re: [cForms] Errors coming from service layer

Reinhard Poetz wrote: Vilya Harvey wrote: Reinhard Pötz wrote: Imagine following scenario: You have a service layer that is exposed as web services. cForms already does as much validation as possible but some complex checks can only be performed by the backend. If I call a webservice (via Axis c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32491] - POST method in cinclude:includexml is broken

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [cForms] Errors coming from service layer

Vilya Harvey wrote: Reinhard Pötz wrote: Imagine following scenario: You have a service layer that is exposed as web services. cForms already does as much validation as possible but some complex checks can only be performed by the backend. If I call a webservice (via Axis client) this webservice

Re: [cForms] Errors coming from service layer

Reinhard Pötz wrote: Imagine following scenario: You have a service layer that is exposed as web services. cForms already does as much validation as possible but some complex checks can only be performed by the backend. If I call a webservice (via Axis client) this webservice can return errors

[2.1.7-dev] o.a.c.util.Deprecation error on java 1.3.1_15

Hi: After "svn up", I compiled the 2.1.7-dev sucessfully using 1.3.1_15, but it does not run [see stacktrace on the screen below]. The code compiles and run OK in java 1.4.2_07. org.mortbay.util.MultiException[java.lang.Nul

[cForms] Errors coming from service layer

Imagine following scenario: You have a service layer that is exposed as web services. cForms already does as much validation as possible but some complex checks can only be performed by the backend. If I call a webservice (via Axis client) this webservice can return errors (how this is done has

Re: [VOTE] Internal Pipelines Error Handling

Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Or even better, let's put this information on the handle-error statement itself, because it's really where it belongs: Only problem I see with it is that it opens up a scenario: ... ... ... And I'm n

Re: [VOTE] Internal Pipelines Error Handling

Sylvain Wallez wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Or even better, let's put this information on the handle-error statement itself, because it's really where it belongs: Only problem I see with it is that it opens up a scenario: ... ... ... And I'm not sure we want to go th

[GUMP@brutus]: Project cocoon (in module cocoon) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project cocoon has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 36 pr

RE: CForms Binding - Cross Referenced Data (duplicate of post on users)

Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Ben Pope wrote: > > > > > > > > > Me > > > > > > You > > > > > > Him > > > > > > > > > > Lounge > > > > > > > > > > Kitchen > > > > > >

Re: CForms Binding - Cross Referenced Data (duplicate of post on users)

Ben Pope wrote: Hi, First of, sorry for the post here, but I've asked a few times on users and not had this solved, so I'm gonna cross my fingers and post here: This is something I've been struggling with, on and off, for some time now. Assume I have some data as follows: Me

Re: CForms Binding - Cross Referenced Data (duplicate of post on users)

> I'd probably want my data xml strutured more like > > > > "It is? Or do you mean forget the cross referencing and have the actual person, with the name element inside the room?" The example I saw (xml fragment) had a person and a room which used ids to associated them. If the data looks li

RE: CForms Binding - Cross Referenced Data (duplicate of post on users)

Just for the record: nested repeaters are supported. I don't have the samples at hand, but if you look at the list of samples just before the dream team sample, you'll see 3. One of them demonstrates nested repeaters. Bye, Helma > -Original Message- > From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [VOTE] Internal Pipelines Error Handling

Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Hi All, I'd implemented error handling for internal pipelines which allows to discard content generated by the internal pipeline and replace it instead with the content generated by the error-handler of the internal pipeline. This feature is activated only when pipeline ha

Re: [cron block] Execute job with original request setup

Pierre Martins wrote: Hi Andreas, [...] Thanks for your help! I managed to make it work. -- Andreas

Re: [cron block] Execute job with original request setup

Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Andreas Hartmann wrote: Hi Cocoon devs, in the process of moving the Lenya scheduler to Cocoon components, I played a little bit with the cron block. At first I tried to invoke a Lenya service from the scheduler by obtaining the service directly via the ServiceableJob's servi