Mark Lundquist wrote:
Hi,
Here is a scenario that I keep finding myself dealing with...
Some repeater is bound to a collection, and also contains one or more
widgets that are /not/ bound to the collection elements. For instance,
there might be a checkbox that means do something to/with the
Mark Lundquist wrote:
Hi,
Here is a scenario that I keep finding myself dealing with...
Some repeater is bound to a collection, and also contains one or more
widgets that are /not/ bound to the collection elements. For instance,
there might be a checkbox that means do something to/with the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35435.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35435.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35435.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35435.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35435.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35435.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35444.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35444.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Give me a 3 lines description of where to start looking and I'll get
going.
A good starting point is the BlocksManager and sitemap component
configurations in the test cases:
src/test/org/apache/cocoon/test/components/blocks/BlocksManagerTestCase.xconf.
all right,
On Jun 20, 2005, at 11:42 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
So in essence, you want to act on the selected rows, right?
Yup.
I encountered this already, and I've been thinking to explicitely add the selection concept to repeaters. That selection would be defined by a boolean field present on each row.
On Jun 20, 2005, at 11:42 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
BTW, why do you prefer v2 rather than v1?
Honestly I can't remember ATM... :-)
I switched a long time ago because (a) I was under the impression that
v2 was where the form API was headed, and (b) more importantly, there
were specific
Hi Sylvain,
I get the same problems with Safari 2.0 (412) with Tiger.
This is just a warning for anyone wanting to use this new Ajax stuff
for real projects .. this stuff does not degrade gracefully, it
just breaks in this browser.
Sorry
regards Jeremy
On 23 Apr 2005, at 13:47,
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
Hi Sylvain,
I get the same problems with Safari 2.0 (412) with Tiger.
This is just a warning for anyone wanting to use this new Ajax stuff
for real projects .. this stuff does not degrade gracefully, it
just breaks in this browser.
Could try turning on the Safari
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
Hi Sylvain,
I get the same problems with Safari 2.0 (412) with Tiger.
This is just a warning for anyone wanting to use this new Ajax stuff
for real projects .. this stuff does not degrade gracefully, it
just breaks in this browser.
Sorry
Don't be! The issue
hi, I'm new to this list and cocoon in general so forgive me, I'm also
not sure if this is exactly where I should be posting this. I'm
working with cocoon forms and have a setup where there are two tabs,
and a reference to the widget? that is used to create a calendar popup
on the tab that is
Irv Salisbury wrote:
Just some more notes on this. It all seems to be happening at the
rhino level. The standard off the shelf cocoon works fine until we do
anything in flowscript (with our without forms) We get two main
errors:
1. java.lang.ClassCastException: inv1
2. function
On 6/21/05, Tony Collen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Irv Salisbury wrote:
Just some more notes on this. It all seems to be happening at the
rhino level. The standard off the shelf cocoon works fine until we do
anything in flowscript (with our without forms) We get two main
errors:
1.
You can try adding Cocoon's version of Rhino to the classpath before
weblogic.jar. However, this may very well cause weblogic itself to have
errors, depending on what you are doing. I only experienced problems
when I was trying to use weblogic portal (8.1.2).
As Tony suggested, you will
One other thing. The version of Rhino in 2.1.x almost certainly won't
work with weblogic. However, I believe the Rhino version in 2.2 might
work better since it comes straight from mozilla. Give that a try (you
still need to override weblogics Rhino). Let us know how it goes.
Ralph
Irv
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 17:48 -0400, Irv Salisbury wrote:
On 6/21/05, Tony Collen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Irv Salisbury wrote:
Just some more notes on this. It all seems to be happening at the
rhino level. The standard off the shelf cocoon works fine until we do
anything in flowscript
Wow, this all sounds like lots of fun. We already tried to put
cocoon's rhino in the classpath first. I am writing a simple
transformer to call the ProtectionDomain stuff to verify where the URL
of the jar file it is loading the class from. (Unless someone has
already done that) Even though
23 matches
Mail list logo
