[jira] Commented: (COCOON-1668) o.a.c.forms.formmodel.GroupTestCase fails

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1668?page=comments#action_12356475 ] Bertrand Delacretaz commented on COCOON-1668: - Looks like the problem is in src/blocks/forms/test/org/apache/cocoon/forms/formmodel/GroupTestCase.xtest which re

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36810] - source that declares namespace fails JXPath/Linkrewriter/Input Modules

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[jira] Commented: (COCOON-1616) source that declares namespace fails JXPath/Linkrewriter/Input Modules

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1616?page=comments#action_12356464 ] David Crossley commented on COCOON-1616: Copying this comment over from the old closed Cocoon Bugzilla ... --- Additional Comment #2 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-

[jira] Reopened: (COCOON-1616) source that declares namespace fails JXPath/Linkrewriter/Input Modules

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1616?page=all ] David Crossley reopened COCOON-1616: Assign To: (was: Antonio Gallardo) See discussion on forrest-dev list. The solution is not yet correct. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11270

Re: Javaflow and 2.1.8

Steinar Jonsson wrote: Attached is a patch that solves problem 1 by adding getParameters() to AbstractContinuable. Applied. Please cross-check! Sylvain -- Sylvain WallezAnyware Technologies http://people.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com Apache Sof

Re: Javaflow and 2.1.8

On Monday 31 October 2005 14:26, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Steinar Jonsson wrote: > > I have played a little with 2.1.8 and have two problems related to > > javaflow. > > > > Problem 1: I cannot get access to sitemap parameters. This is supposedly > > fixed in 2.2, but would be nice to have in 2.1 al

Re: Would this show up in BugZilla???

On Oct 31, 2005, at 8:10 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote: INSERT INTO longdescs (bug_id,who,bug_when,thetext) SELECT bug_id, 1,SYSDATE(),'Issue migrated to Jira: http://issues.apache.org/jira/ bugzillasearch.jsp?id=' || bug_id from bugs where product_id =8; Should work, unless I messed up some mino

Re: Would this show up in BugZilla???

On Oct 31, 2005, at 7:21 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:On 31 Oct 2005, at 14:52, Sander Temme wrote: On Oct 31, 2005, at 5:53 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote: As we want to put a comment into all cocoon bugs in BugZilla pointing to Jira, would something like this work?insert into longdescs (bug_id,who,bug_when

Re: Would this show up in BugZilla???

On 31 Oct 2005, at 16:08, Scott Sanders wrote: On Oct 31, 2005, at 7:21 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 31 Oct 2005, at 14:52, Sander Temme wrote: On Oct 31, 2005, at 5:53 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote: As we want to put a comment into all cocoon bugs in BugZilla pointing to Jira, would something l

Re: Would this show up in BugZilla???

On 31 Oct 2005, at 14:52, Sander Temme wrote: On Oct 31, 2005, at 5:53 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote: As we want to put a comment into all cocoon bugs in BugZilla pointing to Jira, would something like this work? insert into longdescs (bug_id,who,bug_when,thetext) values (X, 1,SYSDATE(),'Issue m

[jira] Updated: (COCOON-1671) Form not binding when prefix in binding definition is unequal to that in the instance data for the same namespace.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1671?page=all ] Suzan Foster updated COCOON-1671: - Attachment: JXPathTest.java Test code to verify that JXPath can handle this issue correctly. Tested with commons-jxpath 1.2. > Form not binding when prefix

[jira] Updated: (COCOON-1671) Form not binding when prefix in binding definition is unequal to that in the instance data for the same namespace.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1671?page=all ] Suzan Foster updated COCOON-1671: - Attachment: form2_bind_xml2.xml Forms binding using xmlns:foo="http://example.com/bar/";, binds successfully whilst it shouldn't. > Form not binding when p

[jira] Created: (COCOON-1671) Form not binding when prefix in binding definition is unequal to that in the instance data for the same namespace.

Form not binding when prefix in binding definition is unequal to that in the instance data for the same namespace. -- Key: COCOON-1671 URL: http://issues.apache.org/ji

[jira] Updated: (COCOON-1671) Form not binding when prefix in binding definition is unequal to that in the instance data for the same namespace.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1671?page=all ] Suzan Foster updated COCOON-1671: - Attachment: form2_bind_xml1.xml Forms binding using xmlns:foo="http://example.com/foo/";. Binding succeeds. > Form not binding when prefix in binding defini

[jira] Updated: (COCOON-1671) Form not binding when prefix in binding definition is unequal to that in the instance data for the same namespace.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1671?page=all ] Suzan Foster updated COCOON-1671: - Attachment: form2_bind_xml3.xml Form binding with xmlns:bar="http://example.com/foo/";, fails whilst it should be successful. > Form not binding when prefi

[jira] Updated: (COCOON-1671) Form not binding when prefix in binding definition is unequal to that in the instance data for the same namespace.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1671?page=all ] Suzan Foster updated COCOON-1671: - Attachment: form2_data.xml Instance data for the xml binding example namespaced with xmlns:foo="http://example.com/foo/";. > Form not binding when prefix i

Re: Would this show up in BugZilla???

On Oct 31, 2005, at 5:53 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote: As we want to put a comment into all cocoon bugs in BugZilla pointing to Jira, would something like this work? insert into longdescs (bug_id,who,bug_when,thetext) values (X, 1,SYSDATE(),'Issue migrated to Jira: http://issues.apache.org/jira

[jira] Updated: (COCOON-1622) [PATCH] SendMailTransformer and HTML body

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1622?page=all ] Pier Fumagalli updated COCOON-1622: --- Bugzilla Id: (was: 36949) Fix Version: 2.1.8-dev (Current SVN) Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> would like to see this one fixed in 2.1.8

[jira] Commented: (COCOON-1671) Form not binding when prefix in binding definition is unequal to that in the instance data for the same namespace.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1671?page=comments#action_12356409 ] Suzan Foster commented on COCOON-1671: -- The problem is being caused by org.apache.cocoon.forms.util.DomHelper. In DomHelper.addLocalNSDeclarations() expects elm.getAttr

Re: FlowScript: Enforcing exlplicit declaration blocks dynamic loading

Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Rob Berens wrote: > > In 2.1.6. explicit declaration of variables in global scope was enforced > > (fix 25951). > > This was implemented by locking the scope after the main part of the main > > script has been loaded and processed. > > In our situation we have one generic sc

Re: [heads-up] old Cocoon bugzilla is not yet closed (Was: [Bug 36810])

On 31 Oct 2005, at 08:01, David Crossley wrote: Youch, i presumed that when we moved to Jira that the old Bugzilla would be closed and people would need to look for our issues.apache.org/jira This old issue was able to be re-opened and commented. You can't _really_ lock down bugzilla... you c

Would this show up in BugZilla???

As we want to put a comment into all cocoon bugs in BugZilla pointing to Jira, would something like this work? insert into longdescs (bug_id,who,bug_when,thetext) values (X, 1,SYSDATE(),'Issue migrated to Jira: http://issues.apache.org/jira/ bugzillasearch.jsp?id=X'); update bugs set resolut

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project cocoon (in module cocoon) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project cocoon has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 59 pr

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project cocoon (in module cocoon) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project cocoon has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 59 pr

Re: Javaflow and 2.1.8

Steinar Jonsson wrote: I have played a little with 2.1.8 and have two problems related to javaflow. Problem 1: I cannot get access to sitemap parameters. This is supposedly fixed in 2.2, but would be nice to have in 2.1 also. Problem 2: I cannot get a selection box value change event to term

Re: complete version of form i18n zh_CN file

Hi Roy, Le 28 oct. 05, à 10:02, roy huang a écrit : ... I have update form the svn,only src\webapp\samples\i18n\translations\messages_zh_CN.xml is update,src\blocks\forms\java\org\apache\cocoon\forms\system\i18n\messag es_zh_CN.xml is not updated.I think this file should be update too. O

Re: Please choose your bugs...

* Pier Fumagalli: > As we're closing the 2.1.8 release, I'd like to get the bugs you > wish were fixed into Jira. Remember that you should set the "Fix > Version/s" field to "2.1.8-dev", which will become (officially) > "2.1.8" when we release. Please fix: [PATCH] SendMailTransformer and HTML b

Re: Docs now use Daisy-wiki defined URLspace

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > hepabolu wrote: > > >On my brand new Powerbook, the background color of the Apache > >Cocoon logo (left with feather) has a different shade of blue as > >background, while I can't remember having seen that on my Windows > >machine. > > > >AFAICT colors are identical.

Re: AJAX form samples still broken? (was Cocoon 2.1.8 AJAX is important)

Patrick Ahles wrote: On 10/30/05, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi: AFAIK, Cocoon 2.1.8 will not have AJAX support for cforms. Is that correct? Oh no, it's not correct! AJAX in CForms is there! Have a look at all the "(Ajax)" markers at http:

[heads-up] old Cocoon bugzilla is not yet closed (Was: [Bug 36810])

Youch, i presumed that when we moved to Jira that the old Bugzilla would be closed and people would need to look for our issues.apache.org/jira This old issue was able to be re-opened and commented. -David On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:41:43AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS