Re: W3C XML Processing working group

2006-01-01 Thread Ross Gardler
Gianugo Rabellino wrote: On 12/30/05, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, The W3C recently set up an "XML Processing working group"[1] whose primary goal is to define an XML processing language (i.e. pipelines). ... My impression is that what this WG will end up defining yet

Re: W3C XML Processing working group

2006-01-01 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
On 1/1/06, Michael Wechner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >I'm not that much interested into yet another DSL expressed in XML, > >and I don't feel alone at all. Actually I'd much rather drift towards > >a programmatic pipeline API. > > > > what do you mean by a programmatic pipeline API? Uhm, pa

Re: W3C XML Processing working group

2006-01-01 Thread Michael Wechner
Gianugo Rabellino wrote: On 12/30/05, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, The W3C recently set up an "XML Processing working group"[1] whose primary goal is to define an XML processing language (i.e. pipelines). Wow, innovation at work! :-) AFAIU the group's direct

RE: webdav block broken in 2.1 branch.

2006-01-01 Thread Max Pfingsthorn
Hi everyone! Sorry, that was me. Thanks for fixing it, Carsten! And yes, it was the right solution. Bye and happy new year! max > -Original Message- > From: Antonio Gallardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 13:48 > To: dev@cocoon.apache.org > Subject: webdav