[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: reinhard
Date: Tue Sep 25 01:55:55 2007
New Revision: 579132
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579132view=rev
Log:
disable this testcase since it doesn't run through with Java 1.4. The
problem is that the included
Spring configuration files can't be
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8058projectId=51
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 03:01:38 -0700
Finished at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 03:02:42 -0700
Total time: 1m 4s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8065projectId=51
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 04:00:41 -0700
Finished at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 04:01:49 -0700
Total time: 1m 8s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
trampus wrote:
Merico Raffaele wrote:
The main reason because I have planned to be in Rome at the CocoonGT was
to
hear a lot on Cocoon 2.2 and to get important information on the migration
path (2.1 to 2.2)
I agree with you...
I will bring a Cocoon 2.2 Classic presentation - how to
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8079projectId=51
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 05:01:41 -0700
Finished at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 05:03:18 -0700
Total time: 1m 36s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Dear Vadim,
Many thanks! This makes definitively sense for me. Although I'm not a core
cocoon hacker, I will participate at the hackaton days. It's up to you guy
of the organisation committee to schedule this important input. From my
point of view it should find a place also on Friday.
Raffaele
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8086projectId=51
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 06:01:12 -0700
Finished at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 06:02:24 -0700
Total time: 1m 12s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Carsten Ziegeler escribió:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: reinhard
Date: Tue Sep 25 01:55:55 2007
New Revision: 579132
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579132view=rev
Log:
disable this testcase since it doesn't run through with Java 1.4. The problem
is that the included
Spring
Antonio Gallardo skrev:
Carsten Ziegeler escribió:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: reinhard
Date: Tue Sep 25 01:55:55 2007
New Revision: 579132
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579132view=rev
Log:
disable this testcase since it doesn't run through with Java 1.4.
The problem is that
Carsten Ziegeler said:
Although I guess everyone understood what I meant above, just a
clarification: of course I meant that it only makes sense to stick with
1.4 if the people working on and using 2.2 *with jdk 1.4* is a critical
mass. There is no doubt that currently there are many people
I agree. I am optimistic adn believe people opinions changes with time.
I would like to start a new vote since we have now a new jave version
scenario in front of us. :)
wdyt?
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
Ralph Goers escribió:
Carsten Ziegeler said:
Although I guess everyone
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:08:52 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J2SE 1.4.2 began its end of life process Dec 11 2006 and is expected to
complete it for the summer of 2008 http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/.
Sun's isn't the only JVM, you know...
According to
Ralph Goers wrote:
Unless the -1 is rescinded I fear *2.2* will be stuck at 1.4 until
2010.
Here, fixed it for you :)
You are saying it like a bad thing. Cocoon 2.1 will be stuck at Java 1.3 until
cows come home. And Cocoon 1.8.2 will be stuck at... Well, you get an idea. I'm
completely
Leszek Gawron pisze:
Lately I keep getting these:
java.lang.ClassCastException: org.mozilla.javascript.NativeObject
at com.mobilebox.smart.model.Contractor.equals(Contractor.java:335)
at java.util.ArrayList.remove(ArrayList.java:424)
at
Vadim Gritsenko pisze:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Unless the -1 is rescinded I fear *2.2* will be stuck at 1.4 until
2010.
Here, fixed it for you :)
You are saying it like a bad thing. Cocoon 2.1 will be stuck at Java 1.3
until cows come home. And Cocoon 1.8.2 will be stuck at... Well, you get
4. Let's start working on 2.3 in trunk with clearly set of general features
we would like to see in
clearly set time-frame with preference of time-frame over feature-set. I
mean, if something does not
make it into 2.3 in planned time-frame it must be rescheduled for 2.4. At the
same time,
Hi,
I wanted to post a blog post about my own tools-set for working with Cocoon 2.2
but because of lack
of time I'll do it later. One important and nice tool I wanted to talk about
was q4e plug-in[1].
Even though I have really pleasant experiences with this plug-in from the past
I don't
Grzegorz Kossakowski pisze:
Hello,
I'm having trouble with our current logging solutions in trunk. I wonder how
to configure logging
the way that I get all debug messages from both Cocoon and Spring. When it
comes to Cocoon logging I
guess that it's controlled by
I definitely think you misunderstood my point. As Vadim rightly pointed
out, I should have ONLY been talking about 2.2 (i.e. trunk). See below
for more.
Grzegorz Kossakowski said:
Vadim Gritsenko pisze:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Unless the -1 is rescinded I fear *2.2* will be stuck at 1.4 until
Felix Knecht wrote:
4. Let's start working on 2.3 in trunk with clearly set of general features we
would like to see in
clearly set time-frame with preference of time-frame over feature-set. I mean,
if something does not
make it into 2.3 in planned time-frame it must be rescheduled for 2.4. At
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8185projectId=51
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 21:01:12 -0700
Finished at: Tue 25 Sep 2007 21:02:34 -0700
Total time: 1m 22s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
21 matches
Mail list logo
