:11, Torsten Curdt wrote:
As I already said: I don't see the point of this parameter stuff. IMO
this only leads to mixing of concepts. Some people will use the {}
some won't. To be honest I would not feel very happy with UGLI since
IMHO this interface is only half-backed. Sorry.
--
Ceki Gülcü
or
container level. We are aware of the problem. It will be addressed in
future versions of log4j.
In any case, I would be quite interested in the numbers you come up
with.
--
Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation consider The complete log4j manual
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products
out off topic, but so is the myth of the
log4j marketing steam-roller.
--
Unico
--
Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation consider The complete log4j manual
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
that it is far from trivial to ensure
stability over the years.
--
Stefano.
--
Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation consider The complete log4j manual
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
