On 27 May 2005, at 17:52, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
That's what I'm after. So you see a roadmap whereby first you work on
easy kernel installation -then- play semantics.
Correct. The other way around would make the goal even harder to
bootstrap. No advancement in an open source software
Hi
On 26 May 2005, at 14:42, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Do you see a point where they'll be
able to put together semi-complex webapps in LEGO style?
Dude, can you read?
http://cocoon.apache.org/ [very first paragraph]
Patently I cannot ;-)
[nobody is responding because that's like asking:
Hello Daniel,
Thanks for your extremely edifying response. As with Stefano, will it
be ok to cite some of your comments in this report? I may not cite you
literally, but I need to credit you if I do. Would that be ok?
The report will be published on Techwatch:
Hi again,
On 25 May 2005, at 10:39, David Casal wrote:
If you read this far, I owe you a beer. Please get creative with your
answers, comic-book style.
*tumbleweed*
Any suggestions as to whether I should post these questions on a new
thread, or perhaps in cocoon-users, or just
wildest dreams for cocoon, even if all I get is
'I'd like cocoon to run my house' or 'shut the fuck up you piano
playing barbarian'.
Yours,
David Casal
--
David Plans Casal, Director of Research, Luminas Internet Applications
Tel: +44 (0)870 741 6658 Fax: +44 (0)700 598 1135
Web
