On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
>
> It strikes me how, in early 2006, people are still thinking that
> another XML domain-specific language is the way to go. We are all
> learning the hard way how the XML verbiage has been useless and, to
> some extents, detrimental: from Jelly onwa
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> > http://agylen.com/2005/05/16/captcha-validator-for-cocoon-forms/
> >
> > Ciao,
>
> Yep, but SVG IMVHO is quite overkill to generate a simple image...
For something really simple:
sub getBCD {
$_ = (123567,36,13457,13467,2346,12467,24567,136,
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> situation seems to be even worse, as the employer owns all output of the
> employee (if they have any business claims in software, which nowadays are
Note that in this case the definition of a contribution and clause 5 help
you here. If your company s
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Other ASF projects have started to request CLAs [1] much "earlier" when
> people contribute to their projects. The reason, IIUC, is to really
> make sure that contributors understand what they're doing in terms of
> licensing, copyright etc.
And
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>
> > Just for fun, and for meaningless PR statements like "Cocoon is a
> > result of work of 12345 developers! 8-O", we can aggregate all names
> > of all contributors into one file.
Very cool ;-)
Dw
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I feel a little stupid. I forgot that I don't have a long distance
> carrier on my fax phone line. I was able to fax the CLA to both Sam's
> number and Dirk's. Hopefully one of them will get it.
Received and perfectly readable. I am updating the CLA fil
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> What does this translate to java? Pretty simple, in fact: if you import
> a class is fine, if you implement an interface is not.
Let me resend them a msg of a few weeks, months now ago, (to their ED
Bradley Kun and their Compliance Office David Tu
e add your fingerprint+email to this page; e.g.
the output 'gpg --fingerprint [EMAIL PROTECTED]' or
'pgpk -ll [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
pub 1024R/EC140B81 1997-04-10 Dirk-Willem van Gulik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint = A5 EC 78
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Steven Noels wrote:
> ASF codebase, regardless of what the Hibernate folks state themselves.
Unelss they donate a second version of the code under a Software grant and
ongoing CLA - but i doubt that it would ever be clean enough for
incubation without that whole community g
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Ugo Cei wrote:
> Stupid and counter to what they have publicly stated many times, that
> their own interpretation of the LGPL is that it is not viral.
However over the years we've not managed to get a public statement (or an
updated L-GPL license) which makes clear that 'im
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Leszek Gawron wrote:
> I am suprised of one fact: how can Spring be distributed with ASL 2.0
Note that at this time the stance of the ASF is that the LGPL should be
considered tainting when used with the 'import' of java code until such
point that the FSF publicly states th
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
..snipped inspiring text about using SNV features and perhaps
changing things so it fits our patterns better now that we 'can'.
...
> My proposal is to create a private branch for every committer that wants
> it and place it in
>
> http://svn.apa
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> The only problem I see is that we can't tag 2.1.6 if we do it this way!
And hense cannot easiily reconstruct what has happened. Just make a branch
at 2.1.5 - I am sure there is a tag there; release a 2.1.5a or a 2.1.6,
whatever you call it; and done
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Can't we simply untar the 2.1.5 distro, shove in the two text files,
> retar it, call it 2.1.6, and release that removing 2.1.5?
Woa - have some mercy on those which 25 years from now need to figure out
what happened on a sunny day in
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Pier just found out that due to a build script problem, Cocoon 2.1.5 was
> released without the LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files.
Mistakes are made; not a problem. No reason for panic.
At this stage I suggest you pull 2.1.5, skip it and release a n
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> Dirk-Willem van Gulik dijo:
> >
> > On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>
> Thanks for the quick response ;-)
The wonders of a laptop going into repairs (with some stuff still in the
sent mail queue) and it coming b
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> Currently, these mock java classes have not copyright notice. Is this
> correct? or we need to include a copyright notice and the respective ASL
> in each of these file?
No every file should have the right copyright text and the url to the
2.0 lice
On Feb 27, 2004, at 12:45 AM, Conal Tuohy wrote:
I don't think the ASF should discourage developers from keeping useful
metadata about the code inside the source files. What better place to
put the metadata than in the code? This makes it more likely to be
used and kept up to date than if it wa
On Feb 27, 2004, at 12:45 AM, Conal Tuohy wrote:
I don't think the ASF should discourage developers from keeping useful
metadata about the code inside the source files. What better place to
put the metadata than in the code? This makes it more likely to be
used and kept up to date than if it wa
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> On 18/11 the 'Austrian Cocoon Day' took place
> (http://cocoon.ifs.tuwien.ac.at).
> Most of the speakers agreed to publish their presentations as PDFs.
>
> You can either find them at the web site of our event or at
> http://cocoon.apache.org/mirror.c
20 matches
Mail list logo
