I had the same need, so I created a small project plainly titled
"Simple XML Pipeline" - https://www.twdata.org/projects/pipeline
I use Spring to wire things together by default, although it should be
pretty easy to plug something else in. I've used this library to
build an HTML processor/URL re
ED]> wrote:
On 11.08.2006 20:41, Don Brown wrote:
> Actually, you'd be surprised to what Retroweaver/Retrotranslator can
> handle. Stripes, a Java 5 annotation-heavy web framework recently
> used it to allow Java 1.4 apps to use Stripes, despite using new Java
> 5 methods, anno
On 8/10/06, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If there are other use cases that require Java 1.4 you should seriously
> consider if Simones proposal of using the Retroweaver would be enough.
This works only as long as you don't use extensions made to the JDK
classes. Different JDK vers
For the next generation of Struts Action Framework, we have merged with WebWork to build the new version on its solid foundation. One of its powerful features are its Interceptors, which act like Servlet filters allowing you to define the framework workflow for the Action on either a per-action or
FWIW, I've been using the stripped down pipeline code I took from
Cocoon to make Simple XML Pipeline [1] primarily to create a framework
which handles document-based SOAP requests as well. With the full
power of the pipeline, you can setup your service to even, based on the
versioned namespace, ex
The continuation support is only in Java and then in the flow
declaration, not Java action-type code. Geert has a good writeup -
http://rifers.org/blogs/gbevin
Don
On Apr 11, 2005 11:21 AM, Leszek Gawron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony Collen wrote:
> > Looks like Spring Web Flow has continuat
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:15:00 +0100, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The simple fact that we have to elaborate such strategies IMO reveals
> that there's a problem. This problem comes from the fact that a dynamic
> property space (request parameters, map entries, etc) is merged with a
>
ength" property.
Don
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:07:58 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:16:23 +0100, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is actually similar to ServletRequest.getParameterMap() in servlet
> > 2.4 which
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:16:23 +0100, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is actually similar to ServletRequest.getParameterMap() in servlet
> 2.4 which we do not have on our Request interface. But we should not
> introduce special wrappers for Map as proposed recently by the
> Struts-f
One aspect that has frustrated me about working with Rhino is the lack
of Javascript's terse syntax when working with Java collections. I
want to access a HashMap's properties with the dot or bracket
notations and especially want the ability to for..in over a Map or
List.
To this end, I took adva
You might find this useful: http://www.twdata.org/pipeline I
extracted the pipeline concept out of Cocoon for other small-focused
purposes (URL rewriting engine for a portlet for example). I also use
it as a transformation front-end to my web services to allow them to
support multiple versions of
11 matches
Mail list logo
