Merico Raffaele wrote:
> The main reason because I have planned to be in Rome at the CocoonGT was
to
> hear a lot on Cocoon 2.2 and to get important information on the migration
> path (2.1 to 2.2)
I agree with you...
bye,
romano
Romano Trampus
Servizi Informatici per le Bibliot
Sorry, I read "spots" of this list and somebody could have written the
same:
I think the cocoon package is too big. I would prefer a core and a lot of
plugins, not in the same distribution. I think the cocoon package is great
but confusing. With plugins you have not to care that anything must ha
> My question is what's advantages and disadvantages i get integrating
> Cocoon in my web project Java+Struts? Is worth it the change?
Hi,
I don't use struts, anyway:
- both are MVC framework, so you can do almost the same task in Struts
and/or cocoon.
- Somebody claims Struts is betters than
Hi Bertrand,
> but did you look at the
> "cacheable" sample of the XSP block?
yes, it seems not to do more than I do in my generator (i.e. setting the
getKey and getValidity methods.
The only way I have found to have cache working is to set the transformers
as "non-cacheable". But this makes
Hi,
I've spent a week on this problem, trying to debug
AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline, CachingPointProcessingPipeline and a few
other classes (cocoon 2.1.7, jdk 1.5, tomcat 5).
The problem is about caching-point. My situation is the following (it seems
the same described in the sitemap.xconf):