Antonio Gallardo wrote:
On Mie, 9 de Febrero de 2005, 4:52, Andrew Savory dijo:
On 9 Feb 2005, at 09:20, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
2) create two blocks for each block that supports xsp: for example a
databases and a databases-xsp block
I suspect this is the easiest option.
Forget to say the obvious:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
I just did a check which blocks require xsp:
- "python"
Uses the xsp core, so this is ok
- "chaperon",
- "lucene"
- "eventcache"
All these three use xsp just for the samples, so we should imho
simply rewrite the samples.
- "databases"
- "session-fw".
These two are th
Il giorno 09/feb/05, alle 18:37, Carsten Ziegeler ha scritto:
So I would suggest to rewrite the samples and simply move the
logicsheets to the xsp blocks; imho it's not worth creating new blocks
just because of these two logicsheets. WDYT?
+1
--
Ugo Cei - http://agylen.com/blojsom/blog/
smime.p
I just did a check which blocks require xsp:
- "python"
Uses the xsp core, so this is ok
- "chaperon",
- "lucene"
- "eventcache"
All these three use xsp just for the samples, so we should imho
simply rewrite the samples.
- "databases"
- "session-fw".
These two are the only blocks that have
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We some blocks that depend on XSP just because they provide some
logigsheets (session, databases etc.), so as soon as you want to use
them you *have* to include XSP although you don't use it at all.
We discussed this already,
On Mie, 9 de Febrero de 2005, 4:52, Andrew Savory dijo:
> Hi,
>
> On 9 Feb 2005, at 09:20, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
>>> 2) create two blocks for each block that supports xsp: for example a
>>> databases and a databases-xsp block
>
> I suspect this is the easiest option.
>
>> Forget to say the obvi
Hi,
On 9 Feb 2005, at 09:20, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
2) create two blocks for each block that supports xsp: for example a
databases and a databases-xsp block
I suspect this is the easiest option.
Forget to say the obvious: this is of course only for trunk.
Hmm - any reason why it can't happen in B
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We some blocks that depend on XSP just because they provide some
logigsheets (session, databases etc.), so as soon as you want to use
them you *have* to include XSP although you don't use it at all.
We discussed this already, but didn't change anyt
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We some blocks that depend on XSP just because they provide some
logigsheets (session, databases etc.), so as soon as you want to use
them you *have* to include XSP although you don't use it at all.
We discussed this already, but didn't change anything :(
I see two soluti
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We some blocks that depend on XSP just because they provide some
logigsheets (session, databases etc.), so as soon as you want to use
them you *have* to include XSP although you don't use it at all.
We discussed this already, but didn't change anything :(
I see two soluti
We some blocks that depend on XSP just because they provide some
logigsheets (session, databases etc.), so as soon as you want to use
them you *have* to include XSP although you don't use it at all.
We discussed this already, but didn't change anything :(
I see two solutions:
1) either move all
11 matches
Mail list logo
