Re: [RT] Remove dependencies to XSP

2005-02-10 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Antonio Gallardo wrote: On Mie, 9 de Febrero de 2005, 4:52, Andrew Savory dijo: On 9 Feb 2005, at 09:20, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: 2) create two blocks for each block that supports xsp: for example a databases and a databases-xsp block I suspect this is the easiest option. Forget to say the obvious:

Re: [RT] Remove dependencies to XSP

2005-02-09 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: I just did a check which blocks require xsp: - "python" Uses the xsp core, so this is ok - "chaperon", - "lucene" - "eventcache" All these three use xsp just for the samples, so we should imho simply rewrite the samples. - "databases" - "session-fw". These two are th

Re: [RT] Remove dependencies to XSP

2005-02-09 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 09/feb/05, alle 18:37, Carsten Ziegeler ha scritto: So I would suggest to rewrite the samples and simply move the logicsheets to the xsp blocks; imho it's not worth creating new blocks just because of these two logicsheets. WDYT? +1 -- Ugo Cei - http://agylen.com/blojsom/blog/ smime.p

Re: [RT] Remove dependencies to XSP

2005-02-09 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
I just did a check which blocks require xsp: - "python" Uses the xsp core, so this is ok - "chaperon", - "lucene" - "eventcache" All these three use xsp just for the samples, so we should imho simply rewrite the samples. - "databases" - "session-fw". These two are the only blocks that have

Re: [RT] Remove dependencies to XSP

2005-02-09 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: We some blocks that depend on XSP just because they provide some logigsheets (session, databases etc.), so as soon as you want to use them you *have* to include XSP although you don't use it at all. We discussed this already,

Re: [RT] Remove dependencies to XSP

2005-02-09 Thread Antonio Gallardo
On Mie, 9 de Febrero de 2005, 4:52, Andrew Savory dijo: > Hi, > > On 9 Feb 2005, at 09:20, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >>> 2) create two blocks for each block that supports xsp: for example a >>> databases and a databases-xsp block > > I suspect this is the easiest option. > >> Forget to say the obvi

Re: [RT] Remove dependencies to XSP

2005-02-09 Thread Andrew Savory
Hi, On 9 Feb 2005, at 09:20, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: 2) create two blocks for each block that supports xsp: for example a databases and a databases-xsp block I suspect this is the easiest option. Forget to say the obvious: this is of course only for trunk. Hmm - any reason why it can't happen in B

Re: [RT] Remove dependencies to XSP

2005-02-09 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: We some blocks that depend on XSP just because they provide some logigsheets (session, databases etc.), so as soon as you want to use them you *have* to include XSP although you don't use it at all. We discussed this already, but didn't change anyt

Re: [RT] Remove dependencies to XSP

2005-02-09 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: We some blocks that depend on XSP just because they provide some logigsheets (session, databases etc.), so as soon as you want to use them you *have* to include XSP although you don't use it at all. We discussed this already, but didn't change anything :( I see two soluti

Re: [RT] Remove dependencies to XSP

2005-02-09 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: We some blocks that depend on XSP just because they provide some logigsheets (session, databases etc.), so as soon as you want to use them you *have* to include XSP although you don't use it at all. We discussed this already, but didn't change anything :( I see two soluti

[RT] Remove dependencies to XSP

2005-02-09 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
We some blocks that depend on XSP just because they provide some logigsheets (session, databases etc.), so as soon as you want to use them you *have* to include XSP although you don't use it at all. We discussed this already, but didn't change anything :( I see two solutions: 1) either move all