Joerg,
How hard would it be to switch to having:
build stable
or
build unstable
instead of build webapp?
That would enable someone to choose right up front, without having to do
any file editing.
Regards, Upayavira
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Tim Larson tim at keow.org writes:
include=true
Upayavira uv at upaya.co.uk writes:
Joerg,
How hard would it be to switch to having:
build stable
or
build unstable
instead of build webapp?
That would enable someone to choose right up front, without having to do
any file editing.
I will add my thoughts to the excluding
Le 31 mars 04, 23:46, Joerg Heinicke a crit :
...WDYT? Change only the documentation (to use true|false) or
additionally the property names from exclude to include
I'm for changing from exclude to include, but you might want to ask for
a [VOTE], or at least a quick vote as this is
Joerg Heinicke dijo:
So now the vote:
[+1 ] exclude.block.blockname=true|false
[ ] include.block.blockname=true|false
IMHO backward compatibility is important.
Antonio Gallardo
Joerg Heinicke joerg.heinicke at gmx.de writes:
As I wrote in my mail, the solution I have is partly backward compatible, this
means a local.blocks.properties in the old style will still work and the blocks
selection will be as expected expected for the case
exclude.block.blockname=false is
Am Do, den 01.04.2004 schrieb Joerg Heinicke um 14:39:
So now the vote:
[ ] exclude.block.blockname=true|false
[+1] include.block.blockname=true|false
Stephan.
IMHO backward compatibility is important.
not here IMHO ...so
[ ] exclude.block.blockname=true|false
[x] include.block.blockname=true|false
cheers
--
Torsten
...So now the vote:
[ ] exclude.block.blockname=true|false
[+1 ] include.block.blockname=true|false
-Bertrand
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Le 31 mars 04, 23:46, Joerg Heinicke a crit :
...WDYT? Change only the documentation (to use true|false) or
additionally the property names from exclude to include
I'm for changing from exclude to include, but you might want to ask for
a [VOTE], or at
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
So now the vote:
[ ] exclude.block.blockname=true|false
[x] include.block.blockname=true|false
--
Reinhard
[ ] exclude.block.blockname=true|false
[X] include.block.blockname=true|false
Ugo
Upayavira wrote:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
[ ] exclude.block.blockname=true|false
[+1] include.block.blockname=true|false
Exclude always seemed really odd to a native English speaker. It was
always the wrong way around.
I trust opinion of native English speaker - very scarce resource
nowadays!
Upayavira wrote:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
snip /
So now the vote:
[ ] exclude.block.blockname=true|false
[+1] include.block.blockname=true|false
is my vote too...
Joerg
Exclude always seemed really odd to a native English speaker. It was
always the wrong way around.
Upayavira
well,
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
[ ] exclude.block.blockname=true|false
[X] include.block.blockname=true|false
Better to use a single positive instead of a double negative ;)
Better later than never,
Tony
Le 1 avr. 04, à 21:41, Vadim Gritsenko a écrit :
...I trust opinion of native English speaker - very scarce resource
nowadays! ;-)
me I can find to Vadim that you serioulsly think when Vadim you
something write, almost. So fortunateless I tendency to very much
agreement, thanks Vadim for the
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 02:41:32PM -0500, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
[ ] exclude.block.blockname=true|false
[+1] include.block.blockname=true|false
Exclude always seemed really odd to a native English speaker. It was
always the wrong way around.
On 01.04.2004 22:00, Tim Larson wrote:
Likewise. BTW, am I missing something or can these two options be
made completely compatible, as in:
include=true == exclude=false
No.
include=false == exclude=true
Yes.
Using
condition property=exclude.block.blockname
not
istrue
On Apr 1, 2004, at 11:45 AM, Tony Collen wrote:
Better to use a single positive instead of a double negative ;)
Or in other words, better not to use a double negative :-)
If my +1 counted, I'd give it to
[X] include.block.blockname=true|false
I don't know if it's because I'm a native English
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:28:22AM +0200, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 01.04.2004 22:00, Tim Larson wrote:
Likewise. BTW, am I missing something or can these two options be
made completely compatible, as in:
include=true == exclude=false
No.
include=false == exclude=true
Yes.
19 matches
Mail list logo