On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 08:24 +0200, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Let's summarize the proposed names (alphabetical order):
Cocoon Chasse
-1: Too carnivore; makes me think first of the French term la chasse
meaning deer hunting or a dish of deer meat.
Cocoon Merenque
+0: How would you pronounce that?
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
On Aug 4, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pick a number that will never be production for the experimental
branch e.g. 2.7. Skip a few numbers in case trunk needs another minor
number (e.g. 2.3 and 2.4) and to avoid confusion that
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
On Aug 4, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pick a number that will never be production for the experimental
branch e.g. 2.7. Skip a few numbers in case trunk needs another minor
number (e.g. 2.3 and 2.4) and to
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
You guys have finally convinced me. Let's use 3.0.x for Corona,
clearly state that it is alpha software on the website in the
README.txt of each release artifact and see what's happening.
Then we only need to find a package name that isn't used in trunk
because Corona
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
You guys have finally convinced me. Let's use 3.0.x for Corona,
clearly state that it is alpha software on the website in the
README.txt of each release artifact and see what's happening.
Then we only need to find a package name that isn't used in
Reinhard Pötz skrev:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
You guys have finally convinced me. Let's use 3.0.x for Corona,
clearly state that it is alpha software on the website in the
README.txt of each release artifact and see what's happening.
Then we only need to find a package
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
it's great to see you here again!
Reinhard Pötz skrev:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
You guys have finally convinced me. Let's use 3.0.x for Corona,
clearly state that it is alpha software on the website in the
README.txt of each release artifact and
Ralph Goers wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Corona currently consists of 4 functional modules:
cocoon-corona-pipeline, cocoon-corona-sitemap,
cocoon-corona-controller and cocoon-corona-servlet. Using functional
names isn't an appropriate solution for our problem. This would lead
to a lot of
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Corona currently consists of 4 functional modules:
cocoon-corona-pipeline, cocoon-corona-sitemap,
cocoon-corona-controller and cocoon-corona-servlet. Using functional
names isn't an appropriate solution for our problem. This would
Doing a quick Google I didn't find anything relevant on Merenque. For
Chasse I found http://www.atomicmpc.com.au/download/chasse.aspx and
http://www.chasseconsulting.com/. The first is some sort of
shareware/freeware hunting game for Windows and the second is a sales
consulting firm. I
Ralph Goers wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Let's summarize the proposed names (alphabetical order):
Cocoon Chasse
Cocoon Merenque
Cocoon Morus
Cocoon Weedle
Could others please check these names too?
Any general comments? Any other suggestions?
I would agree except to suggest that perhaps the
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Let's summarize the proposed names (alphabetical order):
Cocoon Chasse
Cocoon Merenque
Cocoon Morus
Cocoon Weedle
Could others please check these names too?
Any general comments? Any other suggestions?
I would agree except to
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
I still think that we shouldn't use a descriptive name in order to not
confuse our users (and ourselves).
The more I think about it, the more I come to the conclusion that we
should use descriptive names :)
The current Corona code is a collection of various modules that
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
I still think that we shouldn't use a descriptive name in order to not
confuse our users (and ourselves).
The more I think about it, the more I come to the conclusion that we
should use descriptive names :)
The current Corona code is a collection
Has anyone suggested PAPI (Pipeline API) ?
sorry have not been following the thread
regards Jeremy
On 4 Aug 2008, at 07:24, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Any general comments? Any other suggestions?
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
What would Spring do if the have a rewrite that _might_ become Spring
4.0 but they don't know yet?
Ok, I can't read their minds, but it's easier for them as they already
have functional names, So a 4.0 for them is just re-using the right
functional names, adding some,
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
What would Spring do if the have a rewrite that _might_ become Spring
4.0 but they don't know yet?
Ok, I can't read their minds, but it's easier for them as they already
have functional names, So a 4.0 for them is just re-using the right
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Cocoon 2.2 already uses cocoon-pipeline-api-1.0.0,
cocoon-sitemap-api-1.0.0., etc.
Yes, I know - this complicates things a little bit.
What concrete name and version number should we use for what we call
corona-pipeline now? cocoon-pipeline-1.0.0 or
Pick a number that will never be production for the experimental
branch e.g. 2.7. Skip a few numbers in case trunk needs another minor
number (e.g. 2.3 and 2.4) and to avoid confusion that this branch is
not the immediate successor to 2.2. Do not use 2.9 in case a
non-Corona pre-release branch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pick a number that will never be production for the experimental
branch e.g. 2.7. Skip a few numbers in case trunk needs another minor
number (e.g. 2.3 and 2.4) and to avoid confusion that this branch is
not the immediate successor to 2.2. Do not use 2.9 in case a
On Aug 4, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pick a number that will never be production for the experimental
branch e.g. 2.7. Skip a few numbers in case trunk needs another
minor
number (e.g. 2.3 and 2.4) and to avoid confusion that this branch is
not the
On Aug 4, 2008, at 3:49 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
I've never really liked the word pipeline because I tend to think
of surfing when I hear it. That isn't altogether bad I suppose, but
it isn't altogether accurate either. I tend to think of what Cocoon
does more as a pipetree rather than a
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
On Aug 4, 2008, at 3:49 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
I've never really liked the word pipeline because I tend to think
of surfing when I hear it. That isn't altogether bad I suppose, but
it isn't altogether accurate either. I tend to think of what Cocoon
does more as a
23 matches
Mail list logo
