Reinhard Poetz wrote:
What do people think about making Java 5, which was released almost _2
years ago_, the minimum requirement for trunk?
+1 ... although it might limit our user base,
i reckon that Cocoon 2.2 should move on.
This will have impact for Forrest, as we use trunk.
We can move
* David Crossley:
This will have impact for Forrest, as we use trunk.
You do? Then tell me how you use it, because IIRC Forrest uses
Cocoon CLI. How to use it in trunk as the shell script has gone
away?
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
* David Crossley:
This will have impact for Forrest, as we use trunk.
You do? Then tell me how you use it, because IIRC Forrest uses
Cocoon CLI. How to use it in trunk as the shell script has gone
away?
We do use Cocoon trunk 2.2, but still stuck at an
What do people think about making Java 5, which was released almost _2
years
ago_, the minimum requirement for trunk?
+1
Cheers, Alfred.
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential,
proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or
On 8/8/06, Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...What do people think about making Java 5, which was released almost _2 years
ago_, the minimum requirement for trunk?..
I'm ok as long as 2.1.x continues to run on JDK 1.4 (which shouldn't
be a problem as 2.1.x is not supposed to evolve
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 8/8/06, Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...What do people think about making Java 5, which was released almost
_2 years
ago_, the minimum requirement for trunk?..
I'm ok as long as 2.1.x continues to run on JDK 1.4 (which shouldn't
be a problem as
Reinhard Poetz skrev:
What do people think about making Java 5, which was released almost _2
years ago_, the minimum requirement for trunk?
Quoting Bruno from the Daisy list, I'd say that we can benefit from
some new features too: ... we can make use of features like generics,
the enhanced
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
What do people think about making Java 5, which was released almost _2
years ago_, the minimum requirement for trunk?
Quoting Bruno from the Daisy list, I'd say that we can benefit from some
new features too: ... we can make use of features like generics, the
enhanced
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 09:25 +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 8/8/06, Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...What do people think about making Java 5, which was released almost _2
years
ago_, the minimum requirement for trunk?..
I'm ok as long as 2.1.x continues to run on JDK
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
What do people think about making Java 5, which was released almost _2 years
ago_, the minimum requirement for trunk?
+1 (but we should not start refactor all the code *now* to Java 5)
What about moving to servlet 2.4 as well?
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Open
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
What do people think about making Java 5, which was released almost _2 years
ago_, the minimum requirement for trunk?
+1 (but we should not start refactor all the code *now* to Java 5)
agreed
What about moving to servlet 2.4 as well?
What
* Jean-Baptiste Quenot:
* Reinhard Poetz:
What would be the benifits?
Servlet listeners are an example.
Oh no sorry, that was already in servlet 2.3.
See http://java.sun.com/dtd/
What is the current servlet requirement? I remember it was
servlet 2.2 in Cocoon 2.1.X
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
* Jean-Baptiste Quenot:
* Reinhard Poetz:
What would be the benifits?
Servlet listeners are an example.
Oh no sorry, that was already in servlet 2.3.
See http://java.sun.com/dtd/
What is the current servlet requirement? I remember it was
servlet 2.2 in
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
* Jean-Baptiste Quenot:
* Reinhard Poetz:
What would be the benifits?
Servlet listeners are an example.
Oh no sorry, that was already in servlet 2.3.
See http://java.sun.com/dtd/
What is the current servlet requirement? I remember it
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
I will start a vote on the JDK and the servlet API versions as we need a
formal agreement about this IMO.
We used to poll user list last time we changed JDK requirements. It may make
sense to do same now.
Vadim
* Vadim Gritsenko:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
I will start a vote on the JDK and the servlet API versions as
we need a formal agreement about this IMO.
We used to poll user list last time we changed JDK
requirements. It may make sense to do same now.
You're right, it's up to
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
I will start a vote on the JDK and the servlet API versions as we
need a formal agreement about this IMO.
We used to poll user list last time we changed JDK requirements. It
may make sense to do same now.
Your mail arrived
You should start a Vote thread for Java 5 and servlet 2.4.
Ralph
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
What do people think about making Java 5, which was released almost _2
years ago_, the minimum requirement for trunk?
Quoting Bruno from the Daisy list, I'd say that we can benefit from
some new
Ralph Goers wrote:
You should start a Vote thread for Java 5 and servlet 2.4.
Never mind. I see you already did.
Ralph
On 8/8/06, Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do people think about making Java 5, which was released almost _2 years
ago_, the minimum requirement for trunk?
Quoting Bruno from the Daisy list, I'd say that we can benefit from some new
features too: ... we can make use of features
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
I will start a vote on the JDK and the servlet API versions as we
need a formal agreement about this IMO.
We used to poll user list last time we changed JDK requirements. It
may make sense to do same
What do people think about making Java 5, which was released almost _2 years
ago_, the minimum requirement for trunk?
Quoting Bruno from the Daisy list, I'd say that we can benefit from some new
features too: ... we can make use of features like generics, the enhanced for
loop, the
22 matches
Mail list logo
