Re: Issue with cocoon views -- Using views to debug not really possible?

2004-12-10 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Thomas Alexnat wrote: are resulting in a corrupt XML tree after calling them with the default pretty-print view. As expected, the pretty-view gets pretty-printed... Now the question is what behaviour is to be considered "correct" regarding views and internal pip

Re: Issue with cocoon views -- Using views to debug not really possible?

2004-12-08 Thread Thomas Alexnat
Joerg, thank you for your response. It seems that my problem seems not to be solved with the current version of cocoon. Is this correct? I am wondering if this is a bug or a feature. As a cocoon user I would say this is a MAJOR bug in the view concept or implementation. Should I add this bug to

Re: Issue with cocoon views -- Using views to debug not really possible?

2004-12-08 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 08.12.2004 11:38, Sylvain Wallez wrote: Ok, so "cocoon:raw" behaves exaclty as the regular "cocoon:" regarding views. QUESTION What could be the best practice, if I want to look at the XML of a certain pipeline, before its transformation is being called? All I need is a good debugge

Re: Issue with cocoon views -- Using views to debug not really possible?

2004-12-08 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Thomas Alexnat wrote: Dear Sylvain, thank you for your help. I have tested your idea, with a simple content aggregation and both variants do not show the correct xml tree: or are resulting in a corrupt XML tree after calling them with the default pretty-print view. As expecte

Re: Issue with cocoon views -- Using views to debug not really possible?

2004-12-07 Thread Thomas Alexnat
Dear Sylvain, thank you for your help. I have tested your idea, with a simple content aggregation and both variants do not show the correct xml tree: or are resulting in a corrupt XML tree after calling them with the default pretty-print view. As expected, the pretty-view get