Re: (Re)Licensing question

2006-01-11 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 10 Jan 2006, at 17:22, Andrew Stevens wrote: From: Helma van der Linden [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:31:25 +0100 Guys, I usually keep away from licensing issues, but this time I'd like to know if it is done correctly. I'm looking at a project that is made up of several

Re: (Re)Licensing question

2006-01-11 Thread Geoff Howard
On 1/10/06, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This plain language FAQ is helpful: http://www.apache.org/foundation/licence-FAQ.html#WhatDoesItMEAN and follow through to the preFAQ which has a good overview, Any idea why this is stated in the pre-FAQ? quote 9. You have questions

RE: (Re)Licensing question

2006-01-10 Thread Andrew Stevens
From: Helma van der Linden [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:31:25 +0100 Guys, I usually keep away from licensing issues, but this time I'd like to know if it is done correctly. I'm looking at a project that is made up of several other open source projects, cocoon is one of them,

Re: (Re)Licensing question

2006-01-10 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 10 Jan 2006, at 16:31, Helma van der Linden wrote: Guys, I usually keep away from licensing issues, but this time I'd like to know if it is done correctly. I'm looking at a project that is made up of several other open source projects, cocoon is one of them, another (sub)project is

Re: (Re)Licensing question

2006-01-10 Thread hepabolu
Pier Fumagalli wrote: In the second, those changes will be in the hands of the distributor (and thus GPLed). There are two options, either the copyright of those changes is transfered to the ASF by the distributor (and then we'll follows what's described above) or they'll have to maintain

Re: (Re)Licensing question

2006-01-10 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Helma van der Linden wrote: Guys, I usually keep away from licensing issues, but this time I'd like to know if it is done correctly. I'm looking at a project that is made up of several other open source projects, cocoon is one of them, another (sub)project is licensed under BSD. This

Re: (Re)Licensing question

2006-01-10 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Andrew Stevens wrote: From: Helma van der Linden [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:31:25 +0100 Guys, I usually keep away from licensing issues, but this time I'd like to know if it is done correctly. I'm looking at a project that is made up of several other open source projects,

Re: (Re)Licensing question

2006-01-10 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 10 Jan 2006, at 16:31, Helma van der Linden wrote: Guys, I usually keep away from licensing issues, but this time I'd like to know if it is done correctly. I'm looking at a project that is made up of several other open source projects, cocoon is one of them, another

Re: (Re)Licensing question

2006-01-10 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
hepabolu wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: In the second, those changes will be in the hands of the distributor (and thus GPLed). There are two options, either the copyright of those changes is transfered to the ASF by the distributor (and then we'll follows what's described above) or they'll

Re: (Re)Licensing question

2006-01-10 Thread David Crossley
Pier Fumagalli wrote: Helma van der Linden wrote: Guys, I usually keep away from licensing issues, but this time I'd like to know if it is done correctly. I'm looking at a project that is made up of several other open source projects, cocoon is one of them, another (sub)project is