A somewhat late answer ;) But I have spent some more thinking on this
during the discussion about exporting flowscript functions from blocks.
Sylvains original mail can be found in
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11006456093&r=1&w=2.
What I will discuss is rather subtle and involved stuff,
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
>
It seems to me that this is the right approach - there is no
different from the user pov in using vpc or usual components,
which is great! So: +1
Only one question:
>
> The last source-resolving problem is related to URIs that may
> be present in the SAX stream, e.g.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
It seems to me that this is the right approach - there is no different from the user pov in using vpc or usual components, which is great! So: +1
:-)
Only one question:
The last source-resolving problem is related to URIs that may be pre
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> The problem is *which* component and *which* sitemap.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The caller-src file contains elements with
> relative URIs.
> What base URI should the xinclude transformer use?
>
> If the "file+include" generator is used in a subsitemap, the
> com
